This is necessary not only for representing empty ranges, but for handling
multibyte characters in the input. (If the end pointer in a range refers to
a multibyte character, should it point to the beginning or the end of the
character in a char array?) Some of the code in the asm parsers was already
assuming this anyway.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
turning a code like this:
if (foo)
free(foo)
into that:
free(foo)
Move a call to free from basic block FB into FB's predecessor, P,
when the path from P to FB is taken only if the argument of free is
not equal to NULL.
Some restrictions apply on P and FB to be sure that this code motion
is profitable. Namely:
1. FB must have only one predecessor P.
2. FB must contain only the call to free plus an unconditional
branch to S.
3. P's successors are FB and S.
Because of 1., we will not increase the code size when moving the call
to free from FB to P.
Because of 2., FB will be empty after the move.
Because of 2. and 3., P's branch instruction becomes useless, so as FB
(simplifycfg will do the job).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171762 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
peculiar headers under include/llvm.
This struct still doesn't make a lot of sense, but it makes more sense
down in TargetLowering than it did before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171739 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
already in a class, just inline the four of them. I suspect that this
class could be simplified some to not always keep distinct variables for
these things, but it wasn't clear to me how given the usage so I opted
for a trivial and mechanical translation.
This removes one of the two remaining users of a header in include/llvm
which does nothing more than define a 4 member struct.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171738 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
TargetTransformInfo rather than TargetLowering, removing one of the
primary instances of the layering violation of Transforms depending
directly on Target.
This is a really big deal because LSR used to be a "special" pass that
could only be tested fully using llc and by looking at the full output
of it. It also couldn't run with any other loop passes because it had to
be created by the backend. No longer is this true. LSR is now just
a normal pass and we should probably lift the creation of LSR out of
lib/CodeGen/Passes.cpp and into the PassManagerBuilder. =] I've not done
this, or updated all of the tests to use opt and a triple, because
I suspect someone more familiar with LSR would do a better job. This
change should be essentially without functional impact for normal
compilations, and only change behvaior of targetless compilations.
The conversion required changing all of the LSR code to refer to the TTI
interfaces, which fortunately are very similar to TargetLowering's
interfaces. However, it also allowed us to *always* expect to have some
implementation around. I've pushed that simplification through the pass,
and leveraged it to simplify code somewhat. It required some test
updates for one of two things: either we used to skip some checks
altogether but now we get the default "no" answer for them, or we used
to have no information about the target and now we do have some.
I've also started the process of removing AddrMode, as the TTI interface
doesn't use it any longer. In some cases this simplifies code, and in
others it adds some complexity, but I think it's not a bad tradeoff even
there. Subsequent patches will try to clean this up even further and use
other (more appropriate) abstractions.
Yet again, almost all of the formatting changes brought to you by
clang-format. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171735 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
bogus comparison operands to default to eq/oeq. Fix that, fix a couple of
tests that accidentally passed and test for bogus comparison opeartors
explicitly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171733 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some compilers might be confused if bool were potentially signed integer. In my case, g++-4.7.0 miscompiled CodeGen/ARM.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
being present. Make a member of one of the helper classes a reference as
part of this.
Reformatting goodness brought to you by clang-format.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes the loop vectorizer match the pattern followed by roughly all
other passses. =]
Notably, this header file was braken in several regards: it contained
a using namespace directive, global #define's that aren't globaly
appropriate, and global constants defined directly in the header file.
As a side benefit, lots of the types in this file become internal, which
will cause the optimizer to chew on this pass more effectively.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171723 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This could be simplified further, but Hal has a specific feature for
ignoring TTI, and so I preserved that.
Also, I needed to use it because a number of tests fail when switching
from a null TTI to the NoTTI nonce implementation. That seems suspicious
to me and so may be something that you need to look into Hal. I worked
it by preserving the old behavior for these tests with the flag that
ignores all target info.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171722 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Absent a Contributor's License Agreement (CLA) with an LLVM legal entity and as
reviewed and agreed with Chris Lattner, add a patent license covering future
contributions from ARM until there is a CLA. This is to make explicit ARM's
grant of patent rights to recipients of LLVM containing ARM-contributed
material.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171721 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
this patch brought to you by the tool clang-format.
I wanted to fix up the names of constructor parameters because they
followed a bit of an anti-pattern by naming initialisms with CamelCase:
'Tti', 'Se', etc. This appears to have been in an attempt to not overlap
with the names of member variables 'TTI', 'SE', etc. However,
constructor arguments can very safely alias members, and in fact that's
the conventional way to pass in members. I've fixed all of these I saw,
along with making some strang abbreviations such as 'Lp' be simpler 'L',
or 'Lgl' be the word 'Legal'.
However, the code I was touching had indentation and formatting somewhat
all over the map. So I ran clang-format and fixed them.
I also fixed a few other formatting or doxygen formatting issues such as
using ///< on trailing comments so they are associated with the correct
entry.
There is still a lot of room for improvement of the formating and
cleanliness of this code. ;] At least a few parts of the coding
standards or common practices in LLVM's code aren't followed, the enum
naming rules jumped out at me. I may mix some of these while I'm here,
but not all of them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171719 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I'm sorry for duplicating bad style here, but I wanted to keep
consistency. I've pinged the code review thread where this style was
reviewed and changes were requested.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This c'tor takes the AttributeSet class as the parameter. It will eventually
grab the attributes from the specified index and create a new attribute builder
with those attributes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171712 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This works fine with GDB for member variable pointers, but GDB's support for
member function pointers seems to be quite unrelated to
DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type. (see GDB bug 14998 for details)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171698 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
through as a reference rather than a pointer. There is always *some*
implementation of this available, so this simplifies code by not having
to test for whether it is available or not.
Further, it turns out there were piles of places where SimplifyCFG was
recursing and not passing down either TD or TTI. These are fixed to be
more pedantically consistent even though I don't have any particular
cases where it would matter.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171691 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a TargetMachine to construct (and thus isn't always available), to an
analysis group that supports layered implementations much like
AliasAnalysis does. This is a pretty massive change, with a few parts
that I was unable to easily separate (sorry), so I'll walk through it.
The first step of this conversion was to make TargetTransformInfo an
analysis group, and to sink the nonce implementations in
ScalarTargetTransformInfo and VectorTargetTranformInfo into
a NoTargetTransformInfo pass. This allows other passes to add a hard
requirement on TTI, and assume they will always get at least on
implementation.
The TargetTransformInfo analysis group leverages the delegation chaining
trick that AliasAnalysis uses, where the base class for the analysis
group delegates to the previous analysis *pass*, allowing all but tho
NoFoo analysis passes to only implement the parts of the interfaces they
support. It also introduces a new trick where each pass in the group
retains a pointer to the top-most pass that has been initialized. This
allows passes to implement one API in terms of another API and benefit
when some other pass above them in the stack has more precise results
for the second API.
The second step of this conversion is to create a pass that implements
the TargetTransformInfo analysis using the target-independent
abstractions in the code generator. This replaces the
ScalarTargetTransformImpl and VectorTargetTransformImpl classes in
lib/Target with a single pass in lib/CodeGen called
BasicTargetTransformInfo. This class actually provides most of the TTI
functionality, basing it upon the TargetLowering abstraction and other
information in the target independent code generator.
The third step of the conversion adds support to all TargetMachines to
register custom analysis passes. This allows building those passes with
access to TargetLowering or other target-specific classes, and it also
allows each target to customize the set of analysis passes desired in
the pass manager. The baseline LLVMTargetMachine implements this
interface to add the BasicTTI pass to the pass manager, and all of the
tools that want to support target-aware TTI passes call this routine on
whatever target machine they end up with to add the appropriate passes.
The fourth step of the conversion created target-specific TTI analysis
passes for the X86 and ARM backends. These passes contain the custom
logic that was previously in their extensions of the
ScalarTargetTransformInfo and VectorTargetTransformInfo interfaces.
I separated them into their own file, as now all of the interface bits
are private and they just expose a function to create the pass itself.
Then I extended these target machines to set up a custom set of analysis
passes, first adding BasicTTI as a fallback, and then adding their
customized TTI implementations.
The fourth step required logic that was shared between the target
independent layer and the specific targets to move to a different
interface, as they no longer derive from each other. As a consequence,
a helper functions were added to TargetLowering representing the common
logic needed both in the target implementation and the codegen
implementation of the TTI pass. While technically this is the only
change that could have been committed separately, it would have been
a nightmare to extract.
The final step of the conversion was just to delete all the old
boilerplate. This got rid of the ScalarTargetTransformInfo and
VectorTargetTransformInfo classes, all of the support in all of the
targets for producing instances of them, and all of the support in the
tools for manually constructing a pass based around them.
Now that TTI is a relatively normal analysis group, two things become
straightforward. First, we can sink it into lib/Analysis which is a more
natural layer for it to live. Second, clients of this interface can
depend on it *always* being available which will simplify their code and
behavior. These (and other) simplifications will follow in subsequent
commits, this one is clearly big enough.
Finally, I'm very aware that much of the comments and documentation
needs to be updated. As soon as I had this working, and plausibly well
commented, I wanted to get it committed and in front of the build bots.
I'll be doing a few passes over documentation later if it sticks.
Commits to update DragonEgg and Clang will be made presently.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171681 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The reason that there are two cases is that the first case handles the unary cases and the second the binary cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
