uint32.
When folding branches to common destination, the updated branch weights
can exceed uint32 by more than factor of 2. We should keep halving the
weights until they can fit into uint32.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200262 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This brings MC into line with GNU 'as' on ARM, and it brings the ARM
target into line with most other LLVM targets, which declare the
initial CFI state with addInitialFrameState().
Without this, functions generated with .cfi_startproc/endproc on ARM
will tend to cause GDB to abort with:
gdb/dwarf2-frame.c:1132: internal-error: Unknown CFA rule.
I've also tested this by comparing the output of "readelf -w" on the
object files produced by llvm-mc and gas when given the .s file added
here.
This change is part of addressing PR18636.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2597
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200255 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Also update the comment, since it actually produces a
select (setcc) instead of select_cc.
It was checking and using the setcc result type for the
type of the sext, instead of the type of the compared items.
In my problem case, the sext was to i32 and was used as the setcc type,
but the expected type was i64.
No test since I haven't been able to hit the problem with
this on any in-tree targets.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200249 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This commit gives an address mode to the PLD instruction. We
were getting an assertion failure in the frame lowering code
because we had code that was doing a pld of a stack allocated
address. The frame lowering was checking the address mode and
then asserting because pld had none defined.
This commit fixes pld for arm mode. There was a previous fix for
thumb mode in a separate commit. The commit for thumb mode
added a test in a separate file because it would otherwise fail
for arm. This commit moves the thumb test back into the prefetch.ll
file and adds the corresponding arm test.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2622
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch teaches the DAGCombiner how to fold a sext/aext/zext dag node when
the operand in input is a build vector of constants (or UNDEFs).
The inability to fold a sext/zext of a constant build_vector was the root
cause of some pcg bugs affecting vselect expansion on x86-64 with AVX support.
Before this change, the DAGCombiner only knew how to fold a sext/zext/aext of a
ConstantSDNode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit allows LLVM MC to process .cfi_startproc directives when
they are followed by an additional `simple' identifier. This signals to
elide the emission of target specific CFI instructions that would
normally occur initially.
This fixes PR16587.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2624
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200227 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
cold loops as-if they were being optimized for size.
Nothing fancy here. Simply test case included. The nice thing is that we
can now incrementally build on top of this to drive other heuristics.
All of the infrastructure work is done to get the profile information
into this layer.
The remaining work necessary to make this a fully general purpose loop
unroller for very hot loops is to make it a fully general purpose loop
unroller. Things I know of but am not going to have time to benchmark
and fix in the immediate future:
1) Don't disable the entire pass when the target is lacking vector
registers. This really doesn't make any sense any more.
2) Teach the unroller at least and the vectorizer potentially to handle
non-if-converted loops. This is trivial for the unroller but hard for
the vectorizer.
3) Compute the relative hotness of the loop and thread that down to the
various places that make cost tradeoffs (very likely only the
unroller makes sense here, and then only when dealing with loops that
are small enough for unrolling to not completely blow out the LSD).
I'm still dubious how useful hotness information will be. So far, my
experiments show that if we can get the correct logic for determining
when unrolling actually helps performance, the code size impact is
completely unimportant and we can unroll in all cases. But at least
we'll no longer burn code size on cold code.
One somewhat unrelated idea that I've had forever but not had time to
implement: mark all functions which are only reachable via the global
constructors rigging in the module as optsize. This would also decrease
the impact of any more aggressive heuristics here on code size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200219 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to stabilize a test that really is trying to test generic behavior and
not a specific target's behavior.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
object and fewer pointless variables.
Also, add a clarifying comment and a FIXME because the code which
disables *all* vectorization if we can't use implicit floating point
instructions just makes no sense at all.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200214 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
powers of two. This is essentially always the correct thing given the
impact on alignment, scaling factors that can be used in addressing
modes, etc. Also, fix the management of the unroll vs. small loop cost
to more accurately model things with this world.
Enhance a test case to actually exercise more of the unroll machinery if
using synthetic constants rather than a specific target model. Before
this change, with the added flags this test will unroll 3 times instead
of either 2 or 4 (the two sensible answers).
While I don't expect this to make a huge difference, if there are lots
of loops sitting right on the edge of hitting the 'small unroll' factor,
they might change behavior. However, I've benchmarked moving the small
loop cost up and down in many various ways and by a huge factor (2x)
without seeing more than 0.2% code size growth. Small adjustments such
as the series that led up here have led to about 1% improvement on some
benchmarks, but it is very close to the noise floor so I mostly checked
that nothing regressed. Let me know if you see bad behavior on other
targets but I don't expect this to be a sufficiently dramatic change to
trigger anything.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200213 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with the unrolling behavior in the loop vectorizer. No functionality
changed at this point.
These are a bit hack-y, but talking with Hal, there doesn't seem to be
a cleaner way to easily experiment with different thresholds here and he
was also interested in them so I wanted to commit them. Suggestions for
improvement are very welcome here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200212 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
number of vector registers rather than toggling between vector and
scalar register number based on VF. I don't have a test case as
I spotted this by inspection and on X86 it only makes a difference if
your target is lacking SSE and thus has *no* vector registers.
If someone wants to add a test case for this for ARM or somewhere else
where this is more significant, that would be awesome.
Also made the variable name a bit more sensible while I'm here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200211 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unfortunately, this in turn led to some lower quality SCEVs due to some different paths through expression simplification, so add getUDivExactExpr and use it. This fixes all instances of the problems that I found, but we can make that function smarter as necessary.
Merge test "xor-and.ll" into "and-xor.ll" since I needed to update it anyways. Test 'nsw-offset.ll' analyzes a little deeper, %n now gets a scev in terms of %no instead of a SCEVUnknown.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Issue outcomes from DAGCombiner::MergeConsequtiveStores, more precisely from
mem-ops sequence sorting.
Consider, how MergeConsequtiveStores works for next example:
store i8 1, a[0]
store i8 2, a[1]
store i8 3, a[1] ; a[1] again.
return ; DAG starts here
1. Method will collect all the 3 stores.
2. It sorts them by distance from the base pointer (farthest with highest
index).
3. It takes first consecutive non-overlapping stores and (if possible) replaces
them with a single store instruction.
The point is, we can't determine here which 'store' instruction
would be the second after sorting ('store 2' or 'store 3').
It happens that 'store 3' would be the second, and 'store 2' would be the third.
So after merging we have the next result:
store i16 (1 | 3 << 8), base ; is a[0] but bit-casted to i16
store i8 2, a[1]
So actually we swapped 'store 3' and 'store 2' and got wrong contents in a[1].
Fix: In sort routine just also take into account mem-op sequence number.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200201 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopVectorize pass.
The logic here doesn't make much sense. We *only* unrolled if the
unvectorized loop was a reduction loop with a single basic block *and*
small loop body. The reduction part in particular doesn't make much
sense. Instead, if we just fall through to the vectorized unroll logic
it makes more sense of unrolling if there is a vectorized reduction that
could be hacked on by the SLP vectorizer *or* if the loop is small.
This is mostly a cleanup and nothing in the test suite really exercises
this, but I did run benchmarks across this change and saw no really
significant changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200198 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are a couple of interesting things here that we want to check over
(particularly the expecting asserts in StringRef) and get right for general use
in ADT so hold back on this one. For clang we have a workable templated
solution to use in the meanwhile.
This reverts commit r200187.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200194 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
editbin.exe and link.exe both accepts /highentropyva option to set this bit, so
doing s/VIRTUAL_ADDRESS/VA/ should make sense.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200191 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
StringRef is a low-level data wrapper that shouldn't know about language
strings like 'true' and 'false' whereas StringExtras is just the place for
higher-level utilities.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200188 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(1) Add llvm_expect(), an asserting macro that can be evaluated as a constexpr
expression as well as a runtime assert or compiler hint in release builds. This
technique can be used to construct functions that are both unevaluated and
compiled depending on usage.
(2) Update StringRef using llvm_expect() to preserve runtime assertions while
extending the same checks to static asserts in C++11 builds that support the
feature.
(3) Introduce ConstStringRef, a strong subclass of StringRef that references
compile-time constant strings. It's convertible to, but not from, ordinary
StringRef and thus can be used to add compile-time safety to various interfaces
in LLVM and clang that only accept fixed inputs such as diagnostic format
strings that tend to get misused.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200187 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Placed the MC variant diagnostics in the wrong directory accidentally. Move
them into their respective architecture specific directories.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200161 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If a complex expression was passed to the .word directive and the first part of
the directive failed to parse, a secondary diagnostic would be produced that
would clutter the error diagnostics. Improve the diagnostics by consuming the
remainder of the statement.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200160 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
An emitted diagnostic for an invalid relocation variant would place the caret on
the token following the relocation variant indicator or at the end of the line
if there was no following token. This change corrects the placement of the
caret to point to the token.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200159 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c:1361:7: error: C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These were:
* noreorder handling on the target object streamer and asm parser.
* setting the initial flag bits based on the enabled features.
* setting the elf header flag for micromips
It is *really* depressing I am the one doing this instead of someone at
mips actually taking the time to understand the infrastructure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200138 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
