now that we have a correct and cached subtarget specific to the
function.
Also, finish providing a cached per-function subtarget in the core
LLVMTargetMachine -- that layer hadn't switched over yet.
The only use of the TargetMachine was to re-lookup a subtarget for
a particular function to work around the fact that TTI was immutable.
Now that it is per-function and we haved a cached subtarget, use it.
This still leaves a few interfaces with real warts on them where we were
passing Function objects through the TTI interface. I'll remove these
and clean their usage up in subsequent commits now that this isn't
necessary.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227738 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the
derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering.
Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need
to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer.
This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via
a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will
pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences
into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up
the correct subtarget.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227737 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
TargetIRAnalysis access path directly rather than implementing getTTI.
This even removes getTTI from the interface. It's more efficient for
each target to just register a precise callback that creates their
specific TTI.
As part of this, all of the targets which are building their subtargets
individually per-function now build their TTI instance with the function
and thus look up the correct subtarget and cache it. NVPTX, R600, and
XCore currently don't leverage this functionality, but its trivial for
them to add it now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227735 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
null.
For some reason some of the original TTI code supported a null target
machine. This seems to have been legacy, and I made matters worse when
refactoring this code by spreading that pattern further through the
various targets.
The TargetMachine can't actually be null, and it doesn't make sense to
support that use case. I've now consistently removed it and removed all
of the code trying to cope with that situation. This is probably good,
as several targets *didn't* cope with it being null despite the null
default argument in their constructors. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227734 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
terms of the new pass manager's TargetIRAnalysis.
Yep, this is one of the nicer bits of the new pass manager's design.
Passes can in many cases operate in a vacuum and so we can just nest
things when convenient. This is particularly convenient here as I can
now consolidate all of the TargetMachine logic on this analysis.
The most important change here is that this pushes the function we need
TTI for all the way into the TargetMachine, and re-creates the TTI
object for each function rather than re-using it for each function.
We're now prepared to teach the targets to produce function-specific TTI
objects with specific subtargets cached, etc.
One piece of feedback I'd love here is whether its worth renaming any of
this stuff. None of the names really seem that awesome to me at this
point, but TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass is particularly ... odd.
TargetIRAnalysisWrapper might make more sense. I would want to do that
rename separately anyways, but let me know what you think.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
getTTI method used to get an actual TTI object.
No functionality changed. This just threads the argument and ensures
code like the inliner can correctly look up the callee's TTI rather than
using a fixed one.
The next change will use this to implement per-function subtarget usage
by TTI. The changes after that should eliminate the need for FTTI as that
will have become the default.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227730 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227728 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This should be sufficient to replace the initial (minor) function pass
pipeline in Clang with the new pass manager. I'll probably add an (off
by default) flag to do that just to ensure we can get extra testing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I've added RUN lines both to the basic test for EarlyCSE and the
target-specific test, as this serves as a nice test that the TTI layer
in the new pass manager is in fact working well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
over declarations.
This is both quite unproductive and causes things to crash, for example
domtree would just assert.
I've added a declaration and a domtree run to the basic high-level tests
for the new pass manager.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227724 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
produce it.
This adds a function to the TargetMachine that produces this analysis
via a callback for each function. This in turn faves the way to produce
a *different* TTI per-function with the correct subtarget cached.
I've also done the necessary wiring in the opt tool to thread the target
machine down and make it available to the pass registry so that we can
construct this analysis from a target machine when available.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227721 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
CUDA driver can unroll loops when jit-compiling PTX. To prevent CUDA
driver from unrolling a loop marked with llvm.loop.unroll.disable is not
unrolled by CUDA driver, we need to emit .pragma "nounroll" at the
header of that loop.
This patch also extracts getting unroll metadata from loop ID metadata
into a shared helper function.
Test Plan: test/CodeGen/NVPTX/nounroll.ll
Reviewers: eliben, meheff, jholewinski
Reviewed By: jholewinski
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7041
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227703 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type
erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine.
This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI
*pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target
communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While
the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make
types available in a header file for use in a different source file
within each target.
I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line
with this move, but let me know if I missed anything.
With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass
manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces
a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine.
Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept
a function argument as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
type erased interface and a single analysis pass rather than an
extremely complex analysis group.
The end result is that the TTI analysis can contain a type erased
implementation that supports the polymorphic TTI interface. We can build
one from a target-specific implementation or from a dummy one in the IR.
I've also factored all of the code into "mix-in"-able base classes,
including CRTP base classes to facilitate calling back up to the most
specialized form when delegating horizontally across the surface. These
aren't as clean as I would like and I'm planning to work on cleaning
some of this up, but I wanted to start by putting into the right form.
There are a number of reasons for this change, and this particular
design. The first and foremost reason is that an analysis group is
complete overkill, and the chaining delegation strategy was so opaque,
confusing, and high overhead that TTI was suffering greatly for it.
Several of the TTI functions had failed to be implemented in all places
because of the chaining-based delegation making there be no checking of
this. A few other functions were implemented with incorrect delegation.
The message to me was very clear working on this -- the delegation and
analysis group structure was too confusing to be useful here.
The other reason of course is that this is *much* more natural fit for
the new pass manager. This will lay the ground work for a type-erased
per-function info object that can look up the correct subtarget and even
cache it.
Yet another benefit is that this will significantly simplify the
interaction of the pass managers and the TargetMachine. See the future
work below.
The downside of this change is that it is very, very verbose. I'm going
to work to improve that, but it is somewhat an implementation necessity
in C++ to do type erasure. =/ I discussed this design really extensively
with Eric and Hal prior to going down this path, and afterward showed
them the result. No one was really thrilled with it, but there doesn't
seem to be a substantially better alternative. Using a base class and
virtual method dispatch would make the code much shorter, but as
discussed in the update to the programmer's manual and elsewhere,
a polymorphic interface feels like the more principled approach even if
this is perhaps the least compelling example of it. ;]
Ultimately, there is still a lot more to be done here, but this was the
huge chunk that I couldn't really split things out of because this was
the interface change to TTI. I've tried to minimize all the other parts
of this. The follow up work should include at least:
1) Improving the TargetMachine interface by having it directly return
a TTI object. Because we have a non-pass object with value semantics
and an internal type erasure mechanism, we can narrow the interface
of the TargetMachine to *just* do what we need: build and return
a TTI object that we can then insert into the pass pipeline.
2) Make the TTI object be fully specialized for a particular function.
This will include splitting off a minimal form of it which is
sufficient for the inliner and the old pass manager.
3) Add a new pass manager analysis which produces TTI objects from the
target machine for each function. This may actually be done as part
of #2 in order to use the new analysis to implement #2.
4) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and the targets so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to type erase.
5) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and its clients so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to forward.
6) Try to improve the CRTP-based delegation. I feel like this code is
just a bit messy and exacerbating the complexity of implementing
the TTI in each target.
Many thanks to Eric and Hal for their help here. I ended up blocked on
this somewhat more abruptly than I expected, and so I appreciate getting
it sorted out very quickly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7293
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227669 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In preparation for adding PDB support to LLVM, this moves the
DWARF parsing code to its own subdirectory under DebugInfo, and
renames LLVMDebugInfo to LLVMDebugInfoDWARF.
This is purely a mechanical / build system change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7269
Reviewed by: Eric Christopher
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227586 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
analyses back into the LTO code generator.
The pass manager builder (and the transforms library in general)
shouldn't be referencing the target machine at all.
This makes the LTO population work like the others -- the data layout
and target transform info need to be pre-populated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
incarnation of target transform info.
This is in preparation for starting to redesign TTI to be amenable to
the new PM world.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
between the linker's TLS optimizations and Clang's TLS code generation.
For now, Clang has been changed to disable linker TLS optimizations
until it (and LLVM more generally) are emitting TLS code sequences
compatible with the old bugs found in the linkers. That's a better fix
to handle bootstrapping on that platform.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227511 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Any code creating an MCSectionELF knows ELF and already provides the flags.
SectionKind is an abstraction used by common code that uses a plain
MCSection.
Use the flags to compute the SectionKind. This removes a lot of
guessing and boilerplate from the MCSectionELF construction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227476 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to get a powerpc64 host so that I can reproduce and test this, but it
only impacts that platform so trying the only other realistic option.
According to Ulrich, who debugged this initially, initial-exec is likely
to be sufficient for our needs and not subject to this bug. Will watch
the build bots to see.
If this doesn't work, I'll be forced to cut a really ugly pthread-based
approach into the primary user (our stack trace printing) as that user
cannot use the ThreadLocal implementation due to lifetime issues.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
entirely when threads are not enabled. This should allow anyone who
needs to bootstrap or cope with a host loader without TLS support to
limp along without threading support.
There is still some bug in the PPC TLS stuff that is not worked around.
I'm getting access to a machine to reproduce and debug this further.
There is some chance that I'll have to add a terrible workaround for
PPC.
There is also some problem with iOS, but I have no ability to really
evaluate what the issue is there. I'm leaving it to folks maintaining
that platform to suggest a path forward -- personally I don't see any
useful path forward that supports threading in LLVM but does so without
support for *very basic* TLS. Note that we don't need more than some
pointers, and we don't need constructors, destructors, or any of the
other fanciness which remains widely unimplemented.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227411 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the personality is not a recognized MSVC personality function, this
pass delegates to the dwarf EH preparation pass. This chaining supports
people on *-windows-itanium or *-windows-gnu targets.
Currently this recognizes some personalities used by MSVC and turns
resume instructions into traps to avoid link errors. Even if cleanups
are not used in the source program, LLVM requires the frontend to emit a
code path that resumes unwinding after an exception. Clang does this,
and we get unreachable resume instructions. PR20300 covers cleaning up
these unreachable calls to resume.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7216
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227405 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch by: Igor Laevsky <igor@azulsystems.com>
"Currently SplitBlockPredecessors generates incorrect code in case if basic block we are going to split has a landingpad. Also seems like it is fairly common case among it's users to conditionally call either SplitBlockPredecessors or SplitLandingPadPredecessors. Because of this I think it is reasonable to add this condition directly into SplitBlockPredecessors."
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7157
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227390 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Parsed DIEs are stored in a vector and that makes it easy to get their
indices. Having easy access to a DIE's index makes it possible to use
arrays or vectors to efficiently store/access DIE related information.
There's no test for that new functionality (I don't see how to test
it standalone), but it'll be used in a subsequent dsymutil commit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227381 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a refactoring to restructure the single user of performCustomLowering as a specific lowering pass and remove the custom lowering hook entirely.
Before this change, the LowerIntrinsics pass (note to self: rename!) was essentially acting as a pass manager, but without being structured in terms of passes. Instead, it proxied calls to a set of GCStrategies internally. This adds a lot of conceptual complexity (i.e. GCStrategies are stateful!) for very little benefit. Since there's been interest in keeping the ShadowStackGC working, I extracting it's custom lowering pass into a dedicated pass and just added that to the pass order. It will only run for functions which opt-in to that gc.
I wasn't able to find an easy way to preserve the runtime registration of custom lowering functionality. Given that no user of this exists that I'm aware of, I made the choice to just remove that. If someone really cares, we can look at restoring it via dynamic pass registration in the future.
Note that despite the large diff, none of the lowering code actual changes. I added the framing needed to make it a pass and rename the class, but that's it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7218
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The primary goal of this patch is to remove the need for MarkOptionsChanged(). That goal is accomplished by having addOption and removeOption properly sort the options.
This patch puts the new add and remove functionality on a CommandLineParser class that is a placeholder. Some of the functionality in this class will need to be merged into the OptionRegistry, and other bits can hopefully be in a better abstraction.
This patch also removes the RegisteredOptionList global, and the need for cl::Option objects to be linked list nodes.
The changes in CommandLineTest.cpp are required because these changes shift when we validate that options are not duplicated. Before this change duplicate options were only found during certain cl API calls (like cl::ParseCommandLine). With this change duplicate options are found during option construction.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7132
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227345 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
querying of the pass registry.
The pass manager relies on the static registry of PassInfo objects to
perform all manner of its functionality. I don't understand why it does
much of this. My very vague understanding is that this registry is
touched both during static initialization *and* while each pass is being
constructed. As a consequence it is hard to make accessing it not
require a acquiring some lock. This lock ends up in the hot path of
setting up, tearing down, and invaliditing analyses in the legacy pass
manager.
On most systems you can observe this as a non-trivial % of the time
spent in 'ninja check-llvm'. However, I haven't really seen it be more
than 1% in extreme cases of compiling more real-world software,
including LTO.
Unfortunately, some of the GPU JITs are seeing this taking essentially
all of their time because they have very small IR running through
a small pass pipeline very many times (at least, this is the vague
understanding I have of it).
This patch tries to minimize the cost of looking up PassInfo objects by
leveraging the fact that the objects themselves are immutable and they
are allocated separately on the heap and so don't have their address
change. It also requires a change I made the last time I tried to debug
this problem which removed the ability to de-register a pass from the
registry. This patch creates a single access path to these objects
inside the PMTopLevelManager which memoizes the result of querying the
registry. This is somewhat gross as I don't really know if
PMTopLevelManager is the *right* place to put it, and I dislike using
a mutable member to memoize things, but it seems to work.
For long-lived pass managers this should completely eliminate
the cost of acquiring locks to look into the pass registry once the
memoized cache is warm. For 'ninja check' I measured about 1.5%
reduction in CPU time and in total time on a machine with 32 hardware
threads. For normal compilation, I don't know how much this will help,
sadly. We will still pay the cost while we populate the memoized cache.
I don't think it will hurt though, and for LTO or compiles with many
small functions it should still be a win. However, for tight loops
around a pass manager with many passes and small modules, this will help
tremendously. On the AArch64 backend I saw nearly 50% reductions in time
to complete 2000 cycles of spinning up and tearing down the pipeline.
Measurements from Owen of an actual long-lived pass manager show more
along the lines of 10% improvements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7213
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227299 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch folds fcmp in some cases of interest in Julia. The patch adds a function CannotBeOrderedLessThanZero that returns true if a value is provably not less than zero. I.e. the function returns true if the value is provably -0, +0, positive, or a NaN. The patch extends InstructionSimplify.cpp to fold instances of fcmp where:
- the predicate is olt or uge
- the first operand is provably not less than zero
- the second operand is zero
The motivation for handling these cases optimizing away domain checks for sqrt in Julia for common idioms such as sqrt(x*x+y*y)..
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6972
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227298 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This contains the changes from r227148 & r227154, and also fixes to the test case to properly clean up the stack options.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227255 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was introduced in a faulty refactoring (r225640, mea culpa):
the tests weren't testing the return values, so, for both
__strcpy_chk and __stpcpy_chk, we would return the end of the
buffer (matching stpcpy) instead of the beginning (for strcpy).
The root cause was the prefix "__" being ignored when comparing,
which made us always pick LibFunc::stpcpy_chk.
Pass the LibFunc::Func directly to avoid this kind of error.
Also, make the testcases as explicit as possible to prevent this.
The now-useful testcases expose another, entangled, stpcpy problem,
with the further simplification. This was introduced in a
refactoring (r225640) to match the original behavior.
However, this leads to problems when successive simplifications
generate several similar instructions, none of which are removed
by the custom replaceAllUsesWith.
For instance, InstCombine (the main user) doesn't erase the
instruction in its custom RAUW. When trying to simplify say
__stpcpy_chk:
- first, an stpcpy is created (fortified simplifier),
- second, a memcpy is created (normal simplifier), but the
stpcpy call isn't removed.
- third, InstCombine later revisits the instructions,
and simplifies the first stpcpy to a memcpy. We now have
two memcpys.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
