We were completely ignoring the unorder/ordered attributes of condition
codes and also incorrectly lowering seto and setuo.
Reviewed-by: Vincent Lejeune<vljn at ovi.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191603 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
R600 doesn't need to do any scheduling on the SelectionDAG now that it
has a very good MachineScheduler. Also, using the VLIW SelectionDAG
scheduler was having a major impact on compile times. For example with
the phatk kernel here are the LLVM IR to machine code compile times:
With Sched::VLIW
Total Compile Time: 1.4890 Seconds (User + System)
SelectionDAG Instruction Scheduling: 1.1670 Seconds (User + System)
With Sched::Source
Total Compile Time: 0.3330 Seconds (User + System)
SelectionDAG Instruction Scheduling: 0.0070 Seconds (User + System)
The code ouput was identical with both schedulers. This may not be true
for all programs, but it gives me confidence that there won't be much
reduction, if any, in code quality by using Sched::Source.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It fixes around 100 tfb piglit tests and 16 glean tests.
NOTE: This is a candidate for the Mesa stable branch.
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175183 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
