Summary:
According to the ABI documentation, f128 and {f128} should both be returned
in $f0 and $f2. However, this doesn't match GCC's behaviour which is to
return f128 in $f0 and $f2, but {f128} in $f0 and $f1.
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5578
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unfortunately, this isn't easy to fix since there's no simple way to figure out from the disassembler tables whether the W-bit is being used to select a 64-bit GPR or if its a required part of the opcode. The fix implemented here just looks for "64" in the instruction name and ignores the W-bit in 32-bit mode if its present.
Fixes PR21169.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219194 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code already folds sign-/zero-extends, but only if they are arguments to
mul and shift instructions. This extends the code to also fold them when they
are direct inputs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219187 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Tiny enhancement to the address computation code to also fold sub instructions
if the rhs is constant and can be folded into the offset.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit fixes an issue with sign-/zero-extending loads that was discovered
by Richard Barton.
We use now the correct load instructions for sign-extending loads to 64bit. Also
updated and added more unit tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219185 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This instruction form is handled by different AsmOperands now, so the code is
completely dead (and wrong anyway).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219127 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These will make it easier to test further changes to the
code generation and optimization pipelines as those are
moved to subtargets initialized with target feature and
target cpu.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219106 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This trades a (register-renamer-friendly) movaps for a floating point
/ integer domain cross. That is a very bad trade, even on architectures
where domain crossing is relatively fast. On any chip where there is
even a cycle stall, this is a Very Bad Idea. It doesn't even seem likely
to cause a spill to be introduced because the reason for the copy is to
destructively shuffle in place.
Thanks to Ben Kramer for fixing a bug in this code that my new shuffle
lowering exposed and highlighting that perhaps it should just go away.
=]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219090 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's debatable whether this transform is useful at all, but for now make sure
we don't generate invalid asm.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219084 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
new vector shuffle lowering.
This is loosely based on a patch by Marius Wachtler to the PR (thanks!).
I refactored it a bi to use std::count_if and a mutable array ref but
the core idea was exactly right. I also added some direct testing of
this case.
I believe PR21137 is now the only remaining regression.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
shuffles using AVX and AVX2 instructions. This fixes PR21138, one of the
few remaining regressions impacting benchmarks from the new vector
shuffle lowering.
You may note that it "regresses" many of the vperm2x128 test cases --
these were actually "improved" by the naive lowering that the new
shuffle lowering previously did. This regression gave me fits. I had
this patch ready-to-go about an hour after flipping the switch but
wasn't sure how to have the best of both worlds here and thought the
correct solution might be a completely different approach to lowering
these vector shuffles.
I'm now convinced this is the correct lowering and the missed
optimizations shown in vperm2x128 are actually due to missing
target-independent DAG combines. I've even written most of the needed
DAG combine and will submit it shortly, but this part is ready and
should help some real-world benchmarks out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219079 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Update the entire regression test suite for the new shuffles. Remove
most of the old testing which was devoted to the old shuffle lowering
path and is no longer relevant really. Also remove a few other random
tests that only really exercised shuffles and only incidently or without
any interesting aspects to them.
Benchmarking that I have done shows a few small regressions with this on
LNT, zero measurable regressions on real, large applications, and for
several benchmarks where the loop vectorizer fires in the hot path it
shows 5% to 40% improvements for SSE2 and SSE3 code running on Sandy
Bridge machines. Running on AMD machines shows even more dramatic
improvements.
When using newer ISA vector extensions the gains are much more modest,
but the code is still better on the whole. There are a few regressions
being tracked (PR21137, PR21138, PR21139) but by and large this is
expected to be a win for x86 generated code performance.
It is also more correct than the code it replaces. I have fuzz tested
this extensively with ISA extensions up through AVX2 and found no
crashes or miscompiles (yet...). The old lowering had a few miscompiles
and crashers after a somewhat smaller amount of fuzz testing.
There is one significant area where the new code path lags behind and
that is in AVX-512 support. However, there was *extremely little*
support for that already and so this isn't a significant step backwards
and the new framework will probably make it easier to implement lowering
that uses the full power of AVX-512's table-based shuffle+blend (IMO).
Many thanks to Quentin, Andrea, Robert, and others for benchmarking
assistance. Thanks to Adam and others for help with AVX-512. Thanks to
Hal, Eric, and *many* others for answering my incessant questions about
how the backend actually works. =]
I will leave the old code path in the tree until the 3 PRs above are at
least resolved to folks' satisfaction. Then I will rip it (and 1000s of
lines of code) out. =] I don't expect this flag to stay around for very
long. It may not survive next week.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219046 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It turns out this combine was always somewhat flawed -- there are cases
where nested VZEXT nodes *can't* be combined: if their types have
a mismatch that can be observed in the result. While none of these show
up in currently, once I switch to the new vector shuffle lowering a few
test cases actually form such nested VZEXT nodes. I've not come up with
any IR pattern that I can sensible write to exercise this, but it will
be covered by tests once I flip the switch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
nodes to the DAG combining of them.
This will allow the combine to fire on both old vector shuffle lowering
and the new vector shuffle lowering and generally seems like a cleaner
design. I've trimmed down the code a bit and tried to make it and the
surrounding combine fairly clean while moving it around.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219042 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the various ways in which blends can be used to do vector element
insertion for lowering with the scalar math instruction forms that
effectively re-blend with the high elements after performing the
operation.
This then allows me to bail on the element insertion lowering path when
we have SSE4.1 and are going to be doing a normal blend, which in turn
restores the last of the blends lost from the new vector shuffle
lowering when I got it to prioritize insertion in other cases (for
example when we don't *have* a blend instruction).
Without the patterns, using blends here would have regressed
sse-scalar-fp-arith.ll *completely* with the new vector shuffle
lowering. For completeness, I've added RUN-lines with the new lowering
here. This is somewhat superfluous as I'm about to flip the default, but
hey, it shows that this actually significantly changed behavior.
The patterns I've added are just ridiculously repetative. Suggestions on
making them better very much welcome. In particular, handling the
commuted form of the v2f64 patterns is somewhat obnoxious.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219033 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
perform a load to use blendps rather than movss when it is available.
For non-loads, blendps is *much* faster. It can execute on two ports in
Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge, and *three* ports on Haswell. This fixes
one of the "regressions" from aggressively taking the "insertion" path
in the new vector shuffle lowering.
This does highlight one problem with blendps -- it isn't commuted as
heavily as it should be. That's future work though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
C++14 adds new builtin signatures for 'operator delete'. This change allows
new/delete pairs to be removed in C++14 onwards, as they were in C++11 and
before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the X86 backend, matching an address is initiated by the 'addr' complex
pattern and its friends. During this process we may reassociate and-of-shift
into shift-of-and (FoldMaskedShiftToScaledMask) to allow folding of the
shift into the scale of the address.
However as demonstrated by the testcase, this can trigger CSE of not only the
shift and the AND which the code is prepared for but also the underlying load
node. In the testcase this node is sitting in the RecordedNode and MatchScope
data structures of the matcher and becomes a deleted node upon CSE. Returning
from the complex pattern function, we try to access it again hitting an assert
because the node is no longer a load even though this was checked before.
Now obviously changing the DAG this late is bending the rules but I think it
makes sense somewhat. Outside of addresses we prefer and-of-shift because it
may lead to smaller immediates (FoldMaskAndShiftToScale is an even better
example because it create a non-canonical node). We currently don't recognize
addresses during DAGCombiner where arguably this canonicalization should be
performed. On the other hand, having this in the matcher allows us to cover
all the cases where an address can be used in an instruction.
I've also talked a little bit to Dan Gohman on llvm-dev who added the RAUW for
the new shift node in FoldMaskedShiftToScaledMask. This RAUW is responsible
for initiating the recursive CSE on users
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-September/076903.html) but it
is not strictly necessary since the shift is hooked into the visited user. Of
course it's safer to keep the DAG consistent at all times (e.g. for accurate
number of uses, etc.).
So rather than changing the fundamentals, I've decided to continue along the
previous patches and detect the CSE. This patch installs a very targeted
DAGUpdateListener for the duration of a complex-pattern match and updates the
matching state accordingly. (Previous patches used HandleSDNode to detect the
CSE but that's not practical here). The listener is only installed on X86.
I tested that there is no measurable overhead due to this while running
through the spec2k BC files with llc. The only thing we pay for is the
creation of the listener. The callback never ever triggers in spec2k since
this is a corner case.
Fixes rdar://problem/18206171
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
hwsync is only required for seq_cst fences, acquire and release one can use
the cheaper lwsync.
Test Plan: Added some cases to atomics.ll + make check-all
Reviewers: jfb, wschmidt
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5317
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218995 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The register names t4-t7 are not available in the N32 and N64 ABIs.
This patch prints a warning, when those names are used in N32/64,
along with a fix-it with the correct register names.
Patch by Vasileios Kalintiris
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5272
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218989 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adding and modifying CMakeLists.txt files to run unit tests under
unittests/Target/* if the directory exists. Adding basic unit test to check
that code emitter object can be retrieved.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5523
Change by: Colin LeMahieu
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218986 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and MOVSD nodes for single element vector inserts.
This is particularly important because a number of patterns in the
backend detect these patterns and leverage them to simplify things. It
also fixes quite a few of the insertion bad code examples. However, it
regresses a specific area: when available, blendps and blendpd are
*dramatically* faster than movss and movsd respectively. But it doesn't
really work to form the blend logic first because the blends *aren't* as
crazy efficient when the data is coming from memory anyways, and thus
will have a movss or movsd regardless. Also, doing that would block
a bunch of the patterns that this is designed to hit.
So my plan is to go into the patterns for lowering MOVSS and MOVSD and
lower them via blends when available. However that's a pretty invasive
restructuring so it will need to be a follow-up patch.
I have already gone into the patterns to lower MOVSS and MOVSD from
memory using MOVLPD, etc. Without that, several of the test cases
I already have regress.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218985 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
That commit was introduced in order to help investigate a problem in ARM
codegen breaking from commit 202304 (Add a limit to the heuristic that register
allocates instructions in local order). Recent analisys indicated that the
problem no longer exists, so I'm reverting this change.
See PR18996.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218981 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
lowering to handle the potential mirroring of 2-element vectors (because
we can't reliably sort them one way) in the caller rather than in the
insertion logic.
This will simplify things considerably as more ways to fail to match the
insertion are added because now we have a nice try and retry point.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218980 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
lowering to match VZEXT_MOVL patterns.
I hadn't realized that these had sufficient pattern smarts in the
backend to lower zext-ing from the low element of a vector without it
being a scalar_to_vector node. They do, and this is how to match a bunch
of patterns for movq, movss, etc.
There is a weird propensity to end up using pshufd to place the element
afterward even though it means domain crossing (or rather, to use
xorps+movss to zext the element rather than movq) but that's an
orthogonal problem with VZEXT_MOVL that someone should probably look at.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218977 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
element types to form illegal vector types.
I've added a special SSE1 test case here that makes sure we don't break
this going forward.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218974 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
