Handle "X + ~X" -> "-1" in the function Value *Reassociate::OptimizeAdd(Instruction *I, SmallVectorImpl<ValueEntry> &Ops);
This patch implements:
TODO: We could handle "X + ~X" -> "-1" if we wanted, since "-X = ~X+1".
Patch by Rahul Jain!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3835
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/...
edition.
This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes
that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their
name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE.
Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those
headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them
well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation
for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the
modules implementation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206844 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
their inputs come from std::stable_sort and they are not total orders.
I'm not a huge fan of this, but the really bad std::stable_sort is right
at the beginning of Reassociate. After we commit to stable-sort based
consistent respect of source order, the downstream sorts shouldn't undo
that unless they have a total order or they are used in an
order-insensitive way. Neither appears to be true for these cases.
I don't have particularly good test cases, but this jumped out by
inspection when looking for output instability in this pass due to
changes in the ordering of std::sort.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Ideally only those transform passes that run at -O0 remain enabled,
in reality we get as close as we reasonably can.
Passes are responsible for disabling themselves, it's not the job of
the pass manager to do it for them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200892 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
operand into the Value interface just like the core print method is.
That gives a more conistent organization to the IR printing interfaces
-- they are all attached to the IR objects themselves. Also, update all
the users.
This removes the 'Writer.h' header which contained only a single function
declaration.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@198836 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
are part of the core IR library in order to support dumping and other
basic functionality.
Rename the 'Assembly' include directory to 'AsmParser' to match the
library name and the only functionality left their -- printing has been
in the core IR library for quite some time.
Update all of the #includes to match.
All of this started because I wanted to have the layering in good shape
before I started adding support for printing LLVM IR using the new pass
infrastructure, and commandline support for the new pass infrastructure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@198688 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When Reassociator optimize "(x | C1)" ^ "(X & C2)", it may swap the two
subexpressions, however, it forgot to swap cached constants (of C1 and C2)
accordingly.
rdar://13739160
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@180676 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I brazenly think this change is slightly simpler than r178793 because:
- no "state" in functor
- "OpndPtrs[i]" looks simpler than "&Opnds[OpndIndices[i]]"
While I can reproduce the probelm in Valgrind, it is rather difficult to come up
a standalone testing case. The reason is that when an iterator is invalidated,
the stale invalidated elements are not yet clobbered by nonsense data, so the
optimizer can still proceed successfully.
Thank Benjamin for fixing this bug and generously providing the test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
OpndPtrs stored pointers into the Opnd vector that became invalid when the
vector grows. Store indices instead. Sadly I only have a large testcase that
only triggers under valgrind, so I didn't include it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178793 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
operands of the expression being written was wrongly thought to be reusable as
an inner node of the expression resulting in it turning up as both an inner node
*and* a leaf, creating a cycle in the def-use graph. This would have caused the
verifier to blow up if things had gotten that far, however it managed to provoke
an infinite loop first.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168291 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the utility for extracting a chain of operations from the IR, thought that it
might as well combine any constants it came across (rather than just returning
them along with everything else). On the other hand, the factorization code
would like to see the individual constants (this is quite reasonable: it is
much easier to pull a factor of 3 out of 2*3 than it is to pull it out of 6;
you may think 6/3 isn't so hard, but due to overflow it's not as easy to undo
multiplications of constants as it may at first appear). This patch therefore
makes LinearizeExprTree stupider: it now leaves optimizing to the optimization
part of reassociate, and sticks to just analysing the IR.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The assertion is trigged when the Reassociater tries to transform expression
... + 2 * n * 3 + 2 * m + ...
into:
... + 2 * (n*3 + m).
In the process of the transformation, a helper routine folds the constant 2*3 into 6,
confusing optimizer which is trying the to eliminate the common factor 2, and cannot
find 2 any more.
Review is pending. But I'd like commit first in order to help those who are waiting
for this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167740 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was always part of the VMCore library out of necessity -- it deals
entirely in the IR. The .cpp file in fact was already part of the VMCore
library. This is just a mechanical move.
I've tried to go through and re-apply the coding standard's preferred
header sort, but at 40-ish files, I may have gotten some wrong. Please
let me know if so.
I'll be committing the corresponding updates to Clang and Polly, and
Duncan has DragonEgg.
Thanks to Bill and Eric for giving the green light for this bit of cleanup.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@159421 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
before the expression root. Any existing operators that are changed to use one
of them needs to be moved between it and the expression root, and recursively
for the operators using that one. When I rewrote RewriteExprTree I accidentally
inverted the logic, resulting in the compacting going down from operators to
operands rather than up from operands to the operators using them, oops. Fix
this, resolving PR12963.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@159265 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
example degenerate phi nodes and binops that use themselves in unreachable code.
Thanks to Charles Davis for the testcase that uncovered this can of worms.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158508 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
since then the entire expression must equal zero (similarly for other operations
with an absorbing element). With this in place a bunch of reassociate code for
handling constants is dead since it is all taken care of when linearizing. No
intended functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158398 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
POD type, causing memory corruption when mapping to APInts with bitwidth > 64.
Merge another crash testcase into crash.ll while there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158369 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
topologies, it is quite possible for a leaf node to have huge multiplicity, for
example: x0 = x*x, x1 = x0*x0, x2 = x1*x1, ... rapidly gives a value which is x
raised to a vast power (the multiplicity, or weight, of x). This patch fixes
the computation of weights by correctly computing them no matter how big they
are, rather than just overflowing and getting a wrong value. It turns out that
the weight for a value never needs more bits to represent than the value itself,
so it is enough to represent weights as APInts of the same bitwidth and do the
right overflow-avoiding dance steps when computing weights. As a side-effect it
reduces the number of multiplies needed in some cases of large powers. While
there, in view of external uses (eg by the vectorizer) I made LinearizeExprTree
static, pushing the rank computation out into users. This is progress towards
fixing PR13021.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158358 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
problem was that by moving instructions around inside the function, the pass
could accidentally move the iterator being used to advance over the function
too. Fix this by only processing the instruction equal to the iterator, and
leaving processing of instructions that might not be equal to the iterator
to later (later = after traversing the basic block; it could also wait until
after traversing the entire function, but this might make the sets quite big).
Original commit message:
Grab-bag of reassociate tweaks. Unify handling of dead instructions and
instructions to reoptimize. Exploit this to more systematically eliminate
dead instructions (this isn't very useful in practice but is convenient for
analysing some testcase I am working on). No need for WeakVH any more: use
an AssertingVH instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158226 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
can move instructions within the instruction list. If the instruction just
happens to be the one the basic block iterator is pointing to, and it is
moved to a different basic block, then we get into an infinite loop due to
the iterator running off the end of the basic block (for some reason this
doesn't fire any assertions). Original commit message:
Grab-bag of reassociate tweaks. Unify handling of dead instructions and
instructions to reoptimize. Exploit this to more systematically eliminate
dead instructions (this isn't very useful in practice but is convenient for
analysing some testcase I am working on). No need for WeakVH any more: use
an AssertingVH instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158199 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instructions to reoptimize. Exploit this to more systematically eliminate
dead instructions (this isn't very useful in practice but is convenient for
analysing some testcase I am working on). No need for WeakVH any more: use
an AssertingVH instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
then it doesn't alter the instructions composing it, however it would continue
to move the instructions to just before the expression root. Ensure it doesn't
move them either, so now it really does nothing if there is nothing to do. That
commit also ensured that nsw etc flags weren't cleared if the expression was not
being changed. Tweak this a bit so that it doesn't clear flags on the initial
part of a computation either if that part didn't change but later bits did.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@157518 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with arbitrary topologies (previously it would give up when hitting a diamond
in the use graph for example). The testcase from PR12764 is now reduced from
a pile of additions to the optimal 1617*%x0+208. In doing this I changed the
previous strategy of dropping all uses for expression leaves to one of dropping
all but one use. This works out more neatly (but required a bunch of tweaks)
and is also safer: some recently fixed bugs during recursive linearization were
because the linearization code thinks it completely owns a node if it has no uses
outside the expression it is linearizing. But if the node was also in another
expression that had been linearized (and thus all uses of the node from that
expression dropped) then the conclusion that it is completely owned by the
expression currently being linearized is wrong. Keeping one use from within each
linearized expression avoids this kind of mistake.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@157467 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
replace the operands of expressions with only one use with undef and generate
a new expression for the original without using RAUW to update the original.
Thus any copies of the original expression held in a vector may end up
referring to some bogus value - and using a ValueHandle won't help since there
is no RAUW. There is already a mechanism for getting the effect of recursion
non-recursively: adding the value to be recursed on to RedoInsts. But it wasn't
being used systematically. Have various places where recursion had snuck in at
some point use the RedoInsts mechanism instead. Fixes PR12169.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156379 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
