This mirrors the behavior of APInt::udiv and APInt::urem. Some
architectures, like X86, have a single instruction which can compute
both division and remainder.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224217 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
PPCTargetLowering::DAGCombineExtBoolTrunc contains logic to remove unwanted
truncations and extensions when dealing with nodes of the form:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
There was a FIXME in the implementation (now removed) regarding the fact that
the function would abort the transformations if any of the non-output operands
of a SELECT or SELECT_CC node would need to be promoted (because they were
also output operands, for example). As a result, we continued to generate
unnecessary zero-extends for code such as this:
unsigned foo(unsigned a, unsigned b) {
return (a <= b) ? a : b;
}
which would produce:
cmplw 0, 3, 4
isel 3, 4, 3, 1
rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32
blr
and now we produce:
cmplw 0, 3, 4
isel 3, 4, 3, 1
blr
which is better in the obvious way.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224213 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r223862 tried to also combine base-updating load/stores.
r224198 reverted it, as "it created a regression on the test-suite
on test MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram by scrambling the order
in which the words are shown."
Reapply, with a fix to ignore non-normal load/stores.
Truncstores are handled elsewhere (you can actually write a pattern for
those, whereas for postinc loads you can't, since they return two values),
but it should be possible to also combine extloads base updates, by checking
that the memory (rather than result) type is of the same size as the addend.
Original commit message:
We used to only combine intrinsics, and turn them into VLD1_UPD/VST1_UPD
when the base pointer is incremented after the load/store.
We can do the same thing for generic load/stores.
Note that we can only combine the first load/store+adds pair in
a sequence (as might be generated for a v16f32 load for instance),
because other combines turn the base pointer addition chain (each
computing the address of the next load, from the address of the last
load) into independent additions (common base pointer + this load's
offset).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6585
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r223862, as it created a regression on the test-suite
on test MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram by scrambling the order
in which the words are shown. We'll investigate the issue and re-apply
when safe.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224198 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
options.
This commit changes the command line arguments (PassInfo::PassArgument) of two
passes, MachineFunctionPrinter and MachineScheduler, to avoid collisions with
command line options that have the same argument strings.
This bug manifests when the PassList construct (defined in opt.cpp) is used
in a tool that links with codegen passes. To reproduce the bug, paste the
following lines into llc.cpp and run llc.
#include "llvm/IR/LegacyPassNameParser.h"
static llvm:🆑:list<const llvm::PassInfo*, bool, llvm::PassNameParser>
PassList(llvm:🆑:desc("Optimizations available:"));
rdar://problem/19212448
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On PPC64, we end up with lots of i32 -> i64 zero extensions, not only from all
of the usual places, but also from the ABI, which specifies that values passed
are zero extended. Almost all 32-bit PPC instructions in PPC64 mode are defined
to do *something* to the higher-order bits, and for some instructions, that
action clears those bits (thus providing a zero-extended result). This is
especially common after rotate-and-mask instructions. Adding an additional
instruction to zero-extend the results of these instructions is unnecessary.
This PPCISelDAGToDAG peephole optimization examines these zero-extensions, and
looks back through their operands to see if all instructions will implicitly
zero extend their results. If so, we convert these instructions to their 64-bit
variants (which is an internal change only, the actual encoding of these
instructions is the same as the original 32-bit ones) and remove the
unnecessary zero-extension (changing where the INSERT_SUBREG instructions are
to make everything internally consistent).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224169 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Respect the MaxDepth recursion limit, doing otherwise will trigger an
assert in computeKnownBits.
This fixes PR21891.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224168 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang's static analyzer found several potential cases of undefined
behavior, use of un-initialized values, and potentially null pointer
dereferences in tablegen, Support, MC, and ADT. This cleans them up
with specific assertions on the assumptions of the code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224154 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I saw a failure on an internal bot, opened this file, saw it was missing,
thought "aha!", tried to land, got an "file is out of date", synced, didn't see
the file listed right above the line I added (cause I didn't add it in the
right place) and landed. Apologies!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224152 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The RAUW support in `Metadata` supports going to `nullptr` specifically
to handle values being deleted, causing `ValueAsMetadata` to be deleted.
Fix the case where the reference is from a `TrackingMDRef` (as opposed
to an `MDOperand` or a `MetadataAsValue`).
This is surprisingly rare -- metadata tracked by `TrackingMDRef` going
to null -- but it came up in an openSUSE bootstrap during inlining. The
tracking ref was held by the `ValueMap` because it was referencing a
local, the basic block containing the local became dead after it had
been merged in, and when the local was deleted, the tracking ref
asserted in an `isa`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I didn't notice the problem first because on a non debug build the CRT was
just exiting the process without any message.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The goal of this tool is to replicate Darwin's dsymutil functionality
based on LLVM. dsymutil is a DWARF linker. Darwin's linker (ld64) does
not link the debug information, it leaves it in the object files in
relocatable form, but embbeds a `debug map` into the executable that
describes where to find the debug information and how to relocate it.
When releasing/archiving a binary, dsymutil is called to link all the DWARF
information into a `dsym bundle` that can distributed/stored along with
the binary.
With this commit, the LLVM based dsymutil is just able to parse the STABS
debug maps embedded by ld64 in linked binaries (and not all of them, for
example archives aren't supported yet).
Note that the tool directory is called dsymutil, but the executable is
currently called llvm-dsymutil. This discrepancy will disappear once the
tool will be feature complete. At this point the executable will be renamed
to dsymutil, but until then you do not want it to override the system one.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6242
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were already requiring 2.5, which meant that people on old linux distros
had to upgrade anyway.
Requiring python 2.6 will make supporting 3.X easier as we can use the 3.X
exception syntax.
According to the discussion on llvmdev, there is not much value is requiring
just 2.6, we may as well just require 2.7.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224129 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This commit enables the MIPS-III target and adds support for code
generation of SELECT nodes. We have to use pseudo-instructions with
custom inserters for these nodes as MIPS-III CPUs do not have
conditional-move instructions.
Depends on D6212
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6464
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224128 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reapplies r224118 with a fix for test 'misched-code-difference-with-debug.ll'.
That test was failing on some buildbots because it was x86 specific but it was
missing a target triple.
Added an explicit triple to test misched-code-difference-with-debug.ll.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224126 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
For Mips targets that do not have conditional-move instructions, ie. targets
before MIPS32 and MIPS-IV, we have to insert a diamond control-flow
pattern in order to support SELECT nodes. In order to do that, we add
pseudo-instructions with a custom inserter that emits the necessary
control-flow that selects the correct value.
With this patch we add complete support for code generation of Mips-II targets
based on the LLVM test-suite.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6212
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224124 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes the issue reported as PR21807. There was a minor difference
in the generated code depending on the -g flag.
The cause was that with -g the machine scheduler used a different
scheduling strategy. This decision was based on the number of instructions
in a schedule region and included debug instructions in that count.
This patch fixes the issue in MISched and provides a test.
Patch by Russell Gallop!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224118 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The __fp16 type is unconditionally exposed. Since -mfp16-format is not yet
supported, there is not a user switch to change this behaviour. This build
attribute should capture the default behaviour of the compiler, which is to
expose the IEEE 754 version of __fp16.
When -mfp16-format is emitted, that will be the way to control the value of
this build attribute.
Change-Id: I8a46641ff0fd2ef8ad0af5f482a6d1af2ac3f6b0
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224115 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In release builds this is actually possible as without asserts there is
no testing of the actual read bytes and the variables could be partially
uninitialized.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
