Assert that `MDNode::isResolved()`. While in theory the `Verifier`
should catch this, it doesn't descend into all debug info, and the
`DebugInfoVerifier` doesn't call into the `Verifier`. Besides, this
helps to catch bugs when `-disable-verify=true`.
Note that I haven't come across a place where this fails with clang
today, so no testcase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232442 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
By default we want our gcov emission to stay 4.2 compatible, which
means we need to continue emit the exit block last by default. We add
an option to emit it before the body for users that need it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232438 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LLVM currently turns these into linker-private symbols, which can be dead
stripped by the Darwin linker.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232435 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes the reader check the endianness of the object file its
given and behave appropriately. For the test I dug up a really old
linker and created a ppc-apple-darwin file for llvm-cov to read.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232422 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We removed @llvm.eh.typeid.for.i32 and replaced it with
@llvm.eh.typeid.for quite some time ago. Fix up some test cases which
never got updated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232421 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(turns out I had regressed this when sinking handling of this type down
into GetElementPtrInst::Create - since that asserted before the error
handling was performed)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232420 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If `Verifier` has already found a failure, don't call
`DebugInfoVerifier`. The latter sometimes crashes in `DebugInfoFinder`
when the former would give a nice message. The only two cases I found
it crashing are explicit verifier tests I've added:
- test/Verifier/llvm.dbg.declare-expression.ll
- test/Verifier/llvm.dbg.value-expression.ll
However, I assume frontends with bugs will create invalid IR as well.
IMO, the `DebugInfoVerifier` should never crash (instead, it should fail
to verify), but subtleties like that will be easier to work out once
it's enabled again.
This is part of PR22777.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232418 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As part of PR22777, fix testcases that fail the debug info verifier.
The changes fall into the following categories:
- Empty `filename:` fields in `MDFile`s. Compile units and some types
require non-empty filenames. A number of testcases have empty
filenames, probably due to hand-reduction of testcases.
- Not-quite empty arrays: `!{i32 0}`. This used to be equivalent in
the debug info schema to `!{}`. They cause problems for
`!MDSubroutineType`'s `types:` array, since it requires all operands
to be valid types. (Note that `!{null}` is the correct type array
for functions that take no arguments and return `void`.)
- Significantly bitrotted testcases. Nodes got left behind a few
upgrades ago because of missing or invalid tags.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232415 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now that we check `MDExpression` during `-verify` (r232299), make
the `DIExpression` wrapper more strict:
- remove redundant checks in `DebugInfoVerifier`,
- overload `get()` to `cast_or_null<MDExpression>` (superseding
`getRaw()`),
- stop checking for null in any accessor, and
- remove `DIExpression::Verify()` entirely in favour of
`MDExpression::isValid()`.
There is still some logic in this class, mostly to do with high-level
iterators; I'll defer cleaning up those until the rest of the wrappers
are similarly strict.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232412 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clarify the logic in `DIType::Verify()` by checking `isBasicType()`
earlier, by skipping `else` after `return`s, and by documenting an
otherwise opaque check.
No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232410 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Turns out `visitIntrinsicFunctionCall()` descends into all operands
already, so explicitly descending in `visitDbgIntrinsic()` (part of
r232296) isn't useful.
Updating a testcase that doesn't really need `-verify-debug-info` (since
r231082) as confirmation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to print the Mach-O dynamic shared libraries used by a linked image or the
library id of a shared library.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232406 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r230877 optimized which fields are written out for `CHECK`-ability, but
apparently missed changing some of them to optional in `LLParser`.
Fixes PR22921.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This covers essentially all of llvm's headers and libs. One or two weird
cases I wasn't sure were worth/appropriate to fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232394 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
are not at the file level.
Previously, the default subtarget created from the target triple was used to
emit inline asm instructions. Compilation would fail in cases where the feature
bits necessary to assemble an inline asm instruction in a function weren't set.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232392 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are no opcodes for this. This also adds a test case.
v2: make test more robust
Patch by: Grigori Goronzy
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232386 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix justify error for small structures bigger than 32 bits in fixed
arguments for MIPS64 big endian. There was a problem when small structures
are passed as fixed arguments. The structures that are bigger than 32 bits
but smaller than 64 bits were not left justified properly on MIPS64 big
endian. This is fixed by shifting the value to make it left justified when
appropriate.
Patch by Aleksandar Beserminji.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8174
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232382 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
But still handle them the same way since I don't know how they differ on
this target.
No functional change intended.
Reviewers: kparzysz, adasgupt
Reviewed By: kparzysz, adasgupt
Subscribers: colinl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8204
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232374 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This is instead of doing this in target independent code and is the last
non-functional change before targets begin to distinguish between
different memory constraints when selecting code for the ISD::INLINEASM
node.
Next, each target will individually move away from the idea that all
memory constraints behave like 'm'.
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8173
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232373 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This still doesn't actually work correctly for big endian input files,
but since these tests all use little endian input files they don't
actually fail. I'll be committing a real fix for big endian soon, but
I don't have proper tests for it yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232354 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The problem here is the infamous one direction known safe. I was
hesitant to turn it off before b/c of the potential for regressions
without an actual bug from users hitting the problem. This is that bug ;
).
The main performance impact of having known safe in both directions is
that often times it is very difficult to find two releases without a use
in-between them since we are so conservative with determining potential
uses. The one direction known safe gets around that problem by taking
advantage of many situations where we have two retains in a row,
allowing us to avoid that problem. That being said, the one direction
known safe is unsafe. Consider the following situation:
retain(x)
retain(x)
call(x)
call(x)
release(x)
Then we know the following about the reference count of x:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+2
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1 (since we can not release a deallocated pointer).
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 0
That is all the information that we can know statically. That means that
we know that A(x), B(x) together can release (x) at most N+1 times. Lets
say that we remove the inner retain, release pair.
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 0
We knew before that A(x), B(x) could release x up to N+1 times meaning
that rc(x) may be zero at the release(x). That is not safe. On the other
hand, consider the following situation where we have a must use of
release(x) that x must be kept alive for after the release(x)**. Then we
know that:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+2
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 2 (since we know that we are going to release x and that that release can not be the last use of x).
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 1 (since we can not deallocate the pointer since we have a must use after x).
…
// rc(x) >= 1
use(x)
Thus we know that statically the calls to A(x), B(x) can together only
release rc(x) N times. Thus if we remove the inner retain, release pair:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1
…
// rc(x) >= 1
use(x)
We are still safe unless in the final … there are unbalanced retains,
releases which would have caused the program to blow up anyways even
before optimization occurred. The simplest form of must use is an
additional release that has not been paired up with any retain (if we
had paired the release with a retain and removed it we would not have
the additional use). This fits nicely into the ARC framework since
basically what you do is say that given any nested releases regardless
of what is in between, the inner release is known safe. This enables us to get
back the lost performance.
<rdar://problem/19023795>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This will be tested in the next commit (which required it). The commit
is going to update a bunch of tests at the same time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
