is, it assumes addresses are 64-bit aligned (which should be the more common
case). If the alignment is found not to be aligned, then getOperandLatency()
would adjust the operand latency computation by one to compensate for it.
rdar://9294833
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@129742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
TargetInstrInfo:
Change produceSameValue() to take MachineRegisterInfo as an optional argument.
When in SSA form, targets can use it to make more aggressive equality analysis.
Machine LICM:
1. Eliminate isLoadFromConstantMemory, use MI.isInvariantLoad instead.
2. Fix a bug which prevent CSE of instructions which are not re-materializable.
3. Use improved form of produceSameValue.
ARM:
1. Teach ARM produceSameValue to look pass some PIC labels.
2. Look for operands from different loads of different constant pool entries
which have same values.
3. Re-implement PIC GA materialization using movw + movt. Combine the pair with
a "add pc" or "ldr [pc]" to form pseudo instructions. This makes it possible
to re-materialize the instruction, allow machine LICM to hoist the set of
instructions out of the loop and make it possible to CSE them. It's a bit
hacky, but it significantly improve code quality.
4. Some minor bug fixes as well.
With the fixes, using movw + movt to materialize GAs significantly outperform the
load from constantpool method. 186.crafty and 255.vortex improved > 20%, 254.gap
and 176.gcc ~10%.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123905 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I added these instructions recently but I have no idea where these "1"
values in the NextCycles field came from. As far as I can tell now,
these instruction stages are clearly intended to overlap.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120193 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- For now, loads of [r, r] addressing mode is the same as the
[r, r lsl/lsr/asr #] variants. ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatency() should
identify the former case and reduce the output latency by 1.
- Also identify [r, r << 2] case. This special form of shifter addressing mode
is "free".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@117519 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. Cortex-A8 load / store multiplies can only issue on ALU0.
2. Eliminate A8_Issue, A8_LSPipe will correctly limit the load / store issues.
3. Correctly model all vld1 and vld2 variants.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@116134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
allow target to correctly compute latency for cases where static scheduling
itineraries isn't sufficient. e.g. variable_ops instructions such as
ARM::ldm.
This also allows target without scheduling itineraries to compute operand
latencies. e.g. X86 can return (approximated) latencies for high latency
instructions such as division.
- Compute operand latencies for those defined by load multiple instructions,
e.g. ldm and those used by store multiple instructions, e.g. stm.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@115755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. Model dual issues as two FUs.
2. Model the pipelines correctly: two symmetric ALUs, the multiplier is a
dependent pipeline on ALU0.
The changes do not have much impact on codegen right now. But I plan to make
pre-RA scheduler multi-issue aware which should take good advantage of the
changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@115457 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. Cortex-a9 8-bit and 16-bit loads / stores AGU cycles are 1 cycle longer than 32-bit ones.
2. Cortex-a9 is out-of-order so model all read cycles as cycle 1.
3. Lots of other random fixes for A8 and A9.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@115121 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
