It's probably not a huge deal to not do this - if we could, maybe the
address could be reused by a subprogram low_pc and avoid an extra
relocation, but it's just one per CU at best.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217338 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DWARF address ranges contain a reference to the debug_info section. This offset
is an absolute relocation except on non-PE/COFF targets where it is section
relative. We would emit this incorrectly, and trying to map the debug info from
the address would fail.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217317 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Forge a test case where llvm-symbolizer has to use external .dwo
file to produce the inlining information.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit was reverted in r217183, but is OK to go in again now that its dependency is commited (as of r217186).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217231 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The header contains an offset to the DWARF line table for the CU. The offset
must be section relative for COFF and absolute for others. The non-assembly
code path for the DWARF header generation already has the correct emission for
the headers. This corrects the assembly input path.
This was identified by BFD objecting to the LLVM generated DWARF information.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217222 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 93c7e6161e1adbd2c7ac81fa081823183035cb64.
This commit got approved first, but was dependant on another one going in (The one pretty printing attribute values). I'll reapply when the other one is in.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217183 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DW_TAG_lexical_scopes inform debuggers about the instruction range for
which a given variable (or imported declaration/module/etc) is valid. If
the scope doesn't itself contain any such entities, it's a waste of
space and should be omitted.
We were correctly doing this for entirely empty leaves, but not for
intermediate nodes.
Reduces total (not just debug sections) .o file size for a bootstrap
-gmlt LLVM by 22% and bootstrap -gmlt clang executable by 13%. The wins
for a full -g build will be less as a % (and in absolute terms), but
should still be substantial - with some of that win being fewer
relocations, thus more substantiall reducing link times than fewer bytes
alone would have.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216861 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
specifier and change the default behavior to only emit the
DW_AT_accessibility(public) attribute when the isPublic() is explicitly
set.
rdar://problem/18154959
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Somewhat unnoticed in the original implementation of discriminators, but
it could cause instructions to end up in new, small,
DW_TAG_lexical_blocks due to the use of DILexicalBlock to track
discriminator changes.
Instead, use DILexicalBlockFile which we already use to track file
changes without introducing new scopes, so it works well to track
discriminator changes in the same way.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216239 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts:
r215595 "[FastISel][X86] Add large code model support for materializing floating-point constants."
r215594 "[FastISel][X86] Use XOR to materialize the "0" value."
r215593 "[FastISel][X86] Emit more efficient instructions for integer constant materialization."
r215591 "[FastISel][AArch64] Make use of the zero register when possible."
r215588 "[FastISel] Let the target decide first if it wants to materialize a constant."
r215582 "[FastISel][AArch64] Cleanup constant materialization code. NFCI."
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215673 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
refactoring in 215384. This way it can unique multiple entries describing
the same piece even if they don't have the exact same location.
(The same piece may get merged in and be added from OpenRanges).
There ought to be a more elegant solution for this, though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215418 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Due to an unnecessary special case, inlined arguments that happened to
be from the same function as they were inlined into were misclassified
as non-inline arguments and would overwrite the non-inlined arguments.
Assert that we never overwrite a function's arguments, and stop
misclassifying inlined arguments as non-inline arguments to fix this
issue.
Excuse the rather crappy test case - handcrafted IR might do better, or
someone who understands better how to tickle the inliner to create a
recursive inlining situation like this (though it may also be necessary
to tickle the variable in a particular way to cause it to be recorded in
the MMI side table and go down this particular path for location
information).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215157 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
mach-o doesn't like sections without segments, and elf is perfectly
happy with commas in section names, so use a Darwin-like section name.
Suggestion by Eric Christopher.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215052 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Originally this test case tested the specified behavior (that -gmlt
would not produce DW_AT_ranges and that when no CU DW_AT_ranges were
produced, no debug_ranges section (not even an empty list) would be
produced) but then the ranges emission code was improved not to create
ranges of a single element (instead favoring high_pc/low_pc) and so this
test case no longer exercised the -gmlt portion of the behavior.
This caused me some confusion when reading the comments and trying to
update this test case for future changes to -gmlt. I've made this test
resilient to those changes (by using the {{DW_TAG|NULL}} pattern to
block the end of the attribute search at the end of the CU's attribute
list without mandating that it must (or must not) be followed by another
tag (the future changes to -gmlt should produce no subprograms in this
CU))
Fix the test case to have two functions in distinct sections to force
the use of DW_AT_ranges.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214985 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was coming in weird debug info that had variables (and hence
debug_locs) but was in GMLT mode (because it was missing the 13th field
of the compile_unit metadata) so no ranges were constructed. We should
always have at least one range for any CU with a debug_loc in it -
because the range should cover the debug_loc.
The assertion just ensures that the "!= 1" range case inside the
subsequent loop doesn't get entered for the case where there are no
ranges at all, which should never reach here in the first place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214939 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Without the 13th field, the "emission kind" field defaults to 0 (which
is not equal to either of the values of the emission kind enum (1 ==
full debug info, 2 == line tables only)).
In this particular instance, the comparison with "FullDebugInfo" was
done when adding elements to the ranges list - so for these test cases
no values were added to the ranges list.
This got weirder when emitting debug_loc entries as the addresses should
be relative to the range of the CU if the CU has only one range (the
reasonable assumption is that if we're emitting debug_loc lists for a CU
that CU has at least one range - but due to the above situation, it has
zero) so the ranges were emitted relative to the start of the section
rather than relative to the start of the CU's singular range.
Fix these tests by accounting for the difference in the description of
debug_loc entries (in some cases making the test ignorant to these
differences, in others adding the extra label difference expression,
etc) or the presence/absence of high/low_pc on the CU, and add the 13th
field to their CUs to enable proper "full debug info" emission here.
In a future commit I'll fix up a bunch of other test cases that are not
so rigorously depending on this behavior, but still doing similarly
weird things due to the missing 13th field.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214937 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
variables (for example, by-value struct arguments passed in registers, or
large integer values split across several smaller registers).
On the IR level, this adds a new type of complex address operation OpPiece
to DIVariable that describes size and offset of a variable fragment.
On the DWARF emitter level, all pieces describing the same variable are
collected, sorted and emitted as DWARF expressions using the DW_OP_piece
and DW_OP_bit_piece operators.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3373
rdar://problem/15928306
What this patch doesn't do / Future work:
- This patch only adds the backend machinery to make this work, patches
that change SROA and SelectionDAG's type legalizer to actually create
such debug info will follow. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D2680)
- Making the DIVariable complex expressions into an argument of dbg.value
will reduce the memory footprint of the debug metadata.
- The sorting/uniquing of pieces should be moved into DebugLocEntry,
to facilitate the merging of multi-piece entries.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before this patch we had
@a = weak global ...
but
@b = alias weak ...
The patch changes aliases to look more like global variables.
Looking at some really old code suggests that the reason was that the old
bison based parser had a reduction for alias linkages and another one for
global variable linkages. Putting the alias first avoided the reduce/reduce
conflict.
The days of the old .ll parser are long gone. The new one parses just "linkage"
and a later check is responsible for deciding if a linkage is valid in a
given context.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214355 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Per feedback on r214111, we are going to use null to represent unspecified
parameter. If the type array is {null}, it means a function that returns void;
If the type array is {null, null}, it means a variadic function that returns
void. In summary if we have more than one element in the type array and the last
element is null, it is a variadic function.
rdar://17628609
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214189 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The enum types array by design contains pointers to MDNodes rather than DIRefs.
Unique them when handling the enum types in DwarfDebug.
rdar://17628609
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This recommits r208930, r208933, and r208975 (by reverting r209338) and
reverts r209529 (the FIXME to readd this functionality once the tools
were fixed) now that DWP has been fixed to cope with a single section
for all fission type units.
Original commit message:
"Since type units in the dwo file are handled by a debug aware tool,
they don't need to leverage the ELF comdat grouping to implement
deduplication. Avoid creating all the .group sections for these as a
space optimization."
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213956 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.
The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.
A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.
This was then reverted again in r213581 as it caused PR20367. The root
cause of this was the early exit in LiveDebugVariables meant that
spurious DBG_VALUE intrinsics that referenced dead variables were not
removed, causing an assertion/crash later on. The fix is to have
LiveDebugVariables strip all DBG_VALUE intrinsics in functions without
debug info as they're not needed anyway. Test case added to cover this
situation (that occurs when a debug-having function is inlined into a
nodebug function) in test/DebugInfo/X86/nodebug_with_debug_loc.ll
Original commit message:
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add CUs to the named CU node
* Add missing DW_TAG_subprogram nodes
* Add llvm::Functions to the DW_TAG_subprogram nodes
This cleans up the tests so that they don't break under a
soon-to-be-made change that is more strict about such things.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213951 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The header contains an offset to the DWARF abbreviations for the CU. The offset
must be section relative for COFF and absolute for others. The non-assembly
code path for the DWARF header generation already had the correct emission for
the headers. This corrects just the assembly path. Due to the invalid
relocation, processing of the debug information would halt previously on the
first assembly input as the associated abbreviations would be out of range as
they would have the location increased by image base and the section offset.
This address PR20332.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213275 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Just tried this on a few tests and this was the only one that was
easily ported to use the new feature, so we'll go with that for now.
Hopefully can act as inspiration/reminder for other tests.
Not all debug info tests need to check for every DW_TAG or NULL child
terminator, but perhaps they should (just to ensure they don't accidentally
end up with tags nested inside other tags without the test failing, for example)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The dwarf FPR numbers are supposed to have the order F0, F2, F4, F6,
F1, F3, F5, F7, F8, etc., which matches the pairing of registers for
long doubles. E.g. a long double stored in F0 is paired with F2.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212701 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.
The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.
A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.
Original commit message:
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
committed again in r212085 and reverted again in r212089 after fixing
some other cases, such as debug info subprogram lists not keeping track
of the function they represent (r212128) and then short-circuiting
things like LiveDebugVariables that build LexicalScopes for functions
that might not have full debug info.
And again, I believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212205 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r212085.
This breaks the sanitizer bot... & I thought I'd tried pretty hard not
to do that. Guess I need to try harder.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212089 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
and I now believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverting this again, didn't mean to commit it - while r211872 fixes one
of the issues here, there are still others to figure out and address.
This reverts commit r211871.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211873 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
