case, the double being loaded may not be 8-byte aligned, so we have to use
our standard bit_convert game.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25967 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. When rewriting code in outer loops, sometimes we would insert code into
inner loops that is invariant in that loop.
2. Notice that 4*(2+x) is 8+4*x and use that to simplify expressions.
This is a performance neutral change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25964 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. Treat FMOVD as a copy instruction, to help with coallescing in V9 mode
2. When in V9 mode, insert FMOVD instead of FpMOVD instructions, as we don't
ever rewrite FpMOVD instructions into FMOVS instructions, thus we just end
up with commented out copies!
This should fix a bunch of failures in V9 mode on sparc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
int %rlwnm(int %A, int %B) {
%C = call int asm "rlwnm $0, $1, $2, $3, $4", "=r,r,r,n,n"(int %A, int %B, int 4, int 17)
ret int %C
}
into:
_rlwnm:
or r2, r3, r3
or r3, r4, r4
rlwnm r2, r2, r3, 4, 17 ;; note the immediates :)
or r3, r2, r2
blr
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25955 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
store EAX -> [ss#0]
[ss#0] += 1
...
use(EAX)
In this case, it is not valid to rewrite this as:
store EAX -> [ss#0]
EAX += 1
store EAX -> [ss#0] ;;; this would also delete the store above
...
use(EAX)
... because EAX is not a dead at that point. Keep track of which registers
we are allowed to clobber, and which ones we aren't, and don't clobber the
ones we're not supposed to. :)
This should resolve the issues on X86 last night.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25948 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and PhysRegsAvailable maps out into a new AvailableSpills struct. No
functionality change.
This paves the way for a bugfix, coming up next.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25947 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
X86 backend attempts to match small-immediate versions of instructions before
the full size immediate versions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25937 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Chain is initially set to the chain operand of store node, when it reaches
load, if it matches the load then Chain is set to the chain operand of the
load.
However, if the matching code that follows this fails, isel moves on to the
next pattern but it does not restore Chain to the chain operand of the store.
So when it tries to match the next store / op / load pattern it would fail on
the Chain == load.getOperand(0) test.
The solution is for each chain operand to get a unique name. e.g. Chain10.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25931 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. a target doesn't know how to fold load/stores into copies, or
2. the spiller rewrites the input to a copy to the same register as the dest
instead of to the reloaded reg.
This will be moved/improved in the near future, but allows elimination of
some ancient x86 hacks. This eliminates 92 copies from SMG2000 on X86 and
163 copies from 252.eon.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@25922 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
