The primary advantage is that loop optimizations will be applied in a
stable order. This helps debugging and unit test creation. It is also
a better overall implementation without pathologically bad performance
on deep functions.
On large functions (llvm-stress --size=200000 | opt -loops)
Before: 0.1263s
After: 0.0225s
On deep functions (after tweaking llvm-stress, thanks Nadav):
Before: 0.2281s
After: 0.0227s
See r158790 for more comments.
The loop tree is now consistently generated in forward order, but loop
passes are applied in reverse order over the program. If we have a
loop optimization that prefers forward order, that can easily be
achieved by adding a different type of LoopPassManager.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@159183 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-stable-loops enables a new algorithm for generating the Loop
forest. It differs from the original algorithm in a few respects:
- Not determined by use-list order.
- Initially guarantees RPO order of block and subloops.
- Linear in the number of CFG edges.
- Nonrecursive.
I didn't want to change the LoopInfo API yet, so the block lists are
still inclusive. This seems strange to me, and it means that building
LoopInfo is not strictly linear, but it may not be a problem in
practice. At least the block lists start out in RPO order now. In the
future we may add an attribute or wrapper analysis that allows other
passes to assume RPO order.
The primary motivation of this work was not to optimize LoopInfo, but
to allow reproducing performance issues by decomposing the compilation
stages. I'm often unable to do this with the current LoopInfo, because
the loop tree order determines Loop pass order. Serializing the IR
tends to invert the order, which reverses the optimization order. This
makes it nearly impossible to debug interdependent loop optimizations
such as LSR.
I also believe this will provide more stable performance results across time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158790 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The implementation only needs inclusion from LoopInfo.cpp and
MachineLoopInfo.cpp. Clients of the interface should only include the
interface. This makes the interface readable and speeds up rebuilds
after modifying the implementation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Take this opportunity to generalize the indirectbr bailout logic for
loop transformations. CFG transformations will never get indirectbr
right, and there's no point trying.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154386 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into Analysis as a standalone function, since there's no need for
it to be in VMCore. Also, update it to use isKnownNonZero and
other goodies available in Analysis, making it more precise,
enabling more aggressive optimization.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@146610 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The loop tree's inclusive block lists are painful and expensive to
update. (I have no idea why they're inclusive). The design was
supposed to handle this case but the implementation missed it and my
unit tests weren't thorough enough.
Fixes PR11335: loop unroll update.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@144970 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ancestor loops.
I have a unit test that depends on scev-unroll, which unfortunately
isn't checked in. But I will check it in when I can.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@137341 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
An algorithm for incrementally updating LoopInfo within a
LoopPassManager. The incremental update should be extremely cheap in
most cases and can be used in places where it's not feasible to
regenerate the entire loop forest.
- "Unloop" is a node in the loop tree whose last backedge has been removed.
- Perform reverse dataflow on the block inside Unloop to propagate the
nearest loop from the block's successors.
- For reducible CFG, each block in unloop is visited exactly
once. This is because unloop no longer has a backedge and blocks
within subloops don't change parents.
- Immediate subloops are summarized by the nearest loop reachable from
their exits or exits within nested subloops.
- At completion the unloop blocks each have a new parent loop, and
each immediate subloop has a new parent.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@137276 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopPassManager. The incremental update should be extremely cheap in
most cases and can be used in places where it's not feasible to
regenerate the entire loop forest.
- "Unloop" is a node in the loop tree whose last backedge has been removed.
- Perform reverse dataflow on the block inside Unloop to propagate the
nearest loop from the block's successors.
- For reducible CFG, each block in unloop is visited exactly
once. This is because unloop no longer has a backedge and blocks
within subloops don't change parents.
- Immediate subloops are summarized by the nearest loop reachable from
their exits or exits within nested subloops.
- At completion the unloop blocks each have a new parent loop, and
each immediate subloop has a new parent.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@136844 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
perform initialization without static constructors AND without explicit initialization
by the client. For the moment, passes are required to initialize both their
(potential) dependencies and any passes they preserve. I hope to be able to relax
the latter requirement in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@116334 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Loop::hasLoopInvariantOperands method. Remove
a useless and confusing Loop::isLoopInvariant(Instruction)
method, which didn't do what you thought it did.
No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113133 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
contains another loop, or an instruction. The loop form is
substantially more efficient on large loops than the typical
code it replaces.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@91654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
container of the blocks and do efficient lookups. This makes
isLoopSimplifyForm much faster on large loops, fixing a significant
compile-time issue in builds with assertions enabled.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@84673 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the PassManager code into a regular verifyAnalysis method.
Also, reorganize loop verification. Make the LoopPass infrastructure
call verifyLoop as needed instead of having LoopInfo::verifyAnalysis
check every loop in the function after each looop pass. Add a new
command-line argument, -verify-loop-info, to enable the expensive
full checking.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@82952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that get created during loop unswitching, and fix SplitBlockPredecessors'
LCSSA updating code to create new PHIs instead of trying to just move
existing ones.
Also, optimize Loop::verifyLoop, since it gets called a lot. Use
searches on a sorted list of blocks instead of calling the "contains"
function, as is done in other places in the Loop class, since "contains"
does a linear search. Also, don't call verifyLoop from LoopSimplify or
LCSSA, as the PassManager is already calling verifyLoop as part of
LoopInfo's verifyAnalysis.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@81221 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that these passes are properly preserved.
Fix several transformation passes that claimed to preserve LoopSimplify
form but weren't.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@80926 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopSimplify form, which is currently only available on Loops (and
not MachineLoops). Also, move the code out of the header file.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@80923 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
