Typically instcombine has handled this, but pointer differences show up
in several contexts where we would like to get constant folding, and
cannot afford to run instcombine. Specifically, I'm working on improving
the constant folding of arguments used in inline cost analysis with
instsimplify.
Doing this in instsimplify implies some algorithm changes. We have to
handle multiple layers of all-constant GEPs because instsimplify cannot
fold them into a single GEP the way instcombine can. Also, we're only
interested in all-constant GEPs. The result is that this doesn't really
replace the instcombine logic, it's just complimentary and focused on
constant folding.
Reviewed on IRC by Benjamin Kramer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@152555 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
by using llvm::isIdentifiedObject. Also teach it to handle GEPs that have
the same base pointer and constant operands. Fixes PR11238!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151449 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
is that patterns no longer match for vectors of booleans, because you only get
ConstantDataVector when the vector element type is i8, i16, etc, not when it is
i1). Original commit message:
Remove some dead code and tidy things up now that vectors use ConstantDataVector
instead of always using ConstantVector.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@150246 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and positive: positive, because it could be directly computed to be positive;
negative, because the nsw flags means it is either negative or undefined (the
multiplication always overflowed).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@145104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with the given predicate, it matches any condition and returns the
predicate - d'oh! Original commit message:
The expression icmp eq (select (icmp eq x, 0), 1, x), 0 folds to false.
Spotted by my super-optimizer in 186.crafty and 450.soplex. We really
need a proper infrastructure for handling generalizations of this kind
of thing (which occur a lot), however this case is so simple that I decided
to go ahead and implement it directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@143318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Spotted by my super-optimizer in 186.crafty and 450.soplex. We really
need a proper infrastructure for handling generalizations of this kind
of thing (which occur a lot), however this case is so simple that I decided
to go ahead and implement it directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@143214 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
using BinaryOperator (which only works for instructions) when it should have
been a cast to OverflowingBinaryOperator (which also works for constants).
While there, correct a few other dubious looking uses of BinaryOperator.
Thanks to Chad Rosier for the testcase. Original commit message:
My super-optimizer noticed that we weren't folding this expression to
true: (x *nsw x) sgt 0, where x = (y | 1). This occurs in 464.h264ref.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@143125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
often expressed as "x >= y ? x : y", there is a good chance we can extract
the existing "x >= y" from it and use that as a replacement for "max(x,y)==x".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131049 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
but according to my super-optimizer there are only two missed simplifications
of -instsimplify kind when compiling bzip2, and this is one of them. It amuses
me to have bzip2 be perfectly optimized as far as instsimplify goes!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130840 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
max(a,b) >= a -> true. According to my super-optimizer, these are
by far the most common simplifications (of the -instsimplify kind)
that occur in the testsuite and aren't caught by -std-compile-opts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130780 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This automagically provides a transform noticed by my super-optimizer
as occurring quite often: "rem x, (select cond, x, 1)" -> 0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130694 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
gave up when I realized I couldn't come up with a good name for what the
refactored function would be, to describe what it does.
This is PR9343 test12, which is test3 with arguments reordered. Whoops!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@127318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
possible. This goes into instcombine and instsimplify because instsimplify
doesn't need to check hasOneUse since it returns (almost exclusively) constants.
This fixes PR9343 #4#5 and #8!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@127064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
"icmp pred %X, CI" and a number of examples where "%X = binop %Y, CI2".
Some of these cases (div and rem) used to make it through opt -O2, but the
others are probably now making code elsewhere redundant (probably instcombine).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126988 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
more work to do here, "icmp ult (urem X, 10), 11" doesn't optimize away yet.
Fixes example 3 from PR9343!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126741 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
plus some variations of this. According to my auto-simplifier this occurs a lot
but usually in combination with max/min idioms. Because max/min aren't handled
yet this unfortunately doesn't have much effect in the testsuite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@125462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
auto-simplifier). This has a big impact on Ada code, but not much else.
Unfortunately the impact is mostly negative! This is due to PR9004 (aka
SCCP failing to resolve conditional branch conditions in the destination
blocks of the branch), in which simple correlated expressions are not
resolved but complicated ones are, so simplifying has a bad effect!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
