The order in which operands appear in the encoded instruction is different
to order in which they appear in assembly. This changes the XCore backend to
use the instruction encoding order.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
politely report it instead of running into llvm_unreachable.
Also patch llvm-dwarfdump to actually check whether the file it's attempting to
dump is a valid object file.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173489 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With this change the operands order matches the order in which the operands
are encoded in the instruction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173477 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
custom git script called git-svnup which handles all of the work of
using the git-mirrors/keeping the git-svn numbers in sync.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173472 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This warning fires on:
Operator::~Operator() {
llvm_unreachable("should never destroy an Operator");
}
That seems like a false positive. I don't see any good way to silence
the warning here, so I'm disabling it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173455 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Only for integers, pointers, and vectors of those. No floats.
Instrumentation seems very heavy, and may need to be replaced
with some approximation in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173452 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with an initial number of elements, instead of DenseMap, which has
zero initial elements, in order to avoid the copying of elements
when the size changes and to avoid allocating space every time
LegalizeTypes is run. This patch will not affect the memory footprint,
because DenseMap will increase the element size to 64
when the first element is added.
Patch by Wan Xiaofei.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173448 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds an !add(a, b) operator to tablegen; this will be used
to cleanup the PPC register definitions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173445 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Maintain separate per-node and per-tree book-keeping.
Track all instructions above a DAG node including nested subtrees.
Seperately track instructions within a subtree.
Record subtree parents.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173426 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Allow the strategy to select SchedDFS. Allow the results of SchedDFS
to affect initialization of the scheduler state.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173425 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is mostly refactoring, along with adding an instruction count
within the subtrees and ensuring we only look at data edges.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173420 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
loops over instructions in the basic block or the use-def list of the
value, neither of which are really efficient when repeatedly querying
about values in the same basic block.
What's more, we already know that the CondBB is small, and so we can do
a much more efficient test by counting the uses in CondBB, and seeing if
those account for all of the uses.
Finally, we shouldn't blanket fail on any such instruction, instead we
should conservatively assume that those instructions are part of the
cost.
Note that this actually fixes a bug in the pass because
isUsedInBasicBlock has a really terrible bug in it. I'll fix that in my
next commit, but the fix for it would make this code suddenly take the
compile time hit I thought it already was taking, so I wanted to go
ahead and migrate this code to a faster & better pattern.
The bug in isUsedInBasicBlock was also causing other tests to test the
wrong thing entirely: for example we weren't actually disabling
speculation for floating point operations as intended (and tested), but
the test passed because we failed to speculate them due to the
isUsedInBasicBlock failure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For sanity, create a root when NumDataSuccs >= 4. Splitting large
subtrees will no longer be detrimental after my next checkin to handle
nested tree. A magic number of 4 is fine because single subtrees
seldom rejoin more than this. It makes subtrees easier to visualize
and heuristics more sane.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
No functionality change intended.
This captures the first two cases GPR32/64. For the others, we need
an addition operator (if we have one, I've not yet found it).
Based on a suggestion made by Tom Stellard in the AArch64 review!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Change messages to help identify which interpreter was actually selected (safe
vs testing).
Signed-off-by: Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@compnerd.org>
Reviewed-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173360 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Set the message returned after the GCC runner has been constructed as otherwise
the message will be overwritten by the construction of the runner, resulting in
misleading messages.
Signed-off-by: Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@compnerd.org>
Reviewed-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Original commit message:
Plug TTI into the speculation logic, giving it a real cost interface
that can be specialized by targets.
The goal here is not to be more aggressive, but to just be more accurate
with very obvious cases. There are instructions which are known to be
truly free and which were not being modeled as such in this code -- see
the regression test which is distilled from an inner loop of zlib.
Everywhere the TTI cost model is insufficiently conservative I've added
explicit checks with FIXME comments to go add proper modelling of these
cost factors.
If this causes regressions, the likely solution is to make TTI even more
conservative in its cost estimates, but test cases will help here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173357 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
