Consider this code:
int h() {
int x;
try {
x = f();
g();
} catch (...) {
return x+1;
}
return x;
}
The variable x is undefined on the first edge to the landing pad, but it
has the f() return value on the second edge to the landing pad.
SplitAnalysis::getLastSplitPoint() would assume that the return value
from f() was live into the landing pad when f() throws, which is of
course impossible.
Detect these cases, and treat them as if the landing pad wasn't there.
This allows spill code to be inserted after the function call to f().
<rdar://problem/10664933>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147912 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Delete the alternative implementation in LiveIntervalAnalysis.
These functions computed the same thing, but SplitAnalysis caches the
result.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147911 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of several newly un-defaulted switches. This also helps optimizers
(including LLVM's) recognize that every case is covered, and we should
assume as much.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147861 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
define physical registers. It's currently very restrictive, only catching
cases where the CE is in an immediate (and only) predecessor. But it catches
a surprising large number of cases.
rdar://10660865
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147827 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reserved registers don't have proper live ranges, their LiveInterval
simply has a snippet of liveness for each def. Virtual registers with a
single value that is a copy of a reserved register (typically %esp) can
be coalesced with the reserved register if the live range doesn't
overlap any reserved register defs.
When coalescing with a reserved register, don't modify the reserved
register live range. Just leave it as a bunch of dead defs. This
eliminates quadratic coalescer behavior in i386 functions with many
function calls.
PR11699
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
up so branch folding pass can't use the scavenger. :-( This doesn't breaks
anything currently. It just means targets which do not carefully update kill
markers cannot run post-ra scheduler (not new, it has always been the case).
We should fix this at some point since it's really hacky.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147719 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
opportunities that only present themselves after late optimizations
such as tail duplication .e.g.
## BB#1:
movl %eax, %ecx
movl %ecx, %eax
ret
The register allocator also leaves some of them around (due to false
dep between copies from phi-elimination, etc.)
This required some changes in codegen passes. Post-ra scheduler and the
pseudo-instruction expansion passes have been moved after branch folding
and tail merging. They were before branch folding before because it did
not always update block livein's. That's fixed now. The pass change makes
independently since we want to properly schedule instructions after
branch folding / tail duplication.
rdar://10428165
rdar://10640363
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147716 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the debug type accelerator tables to contain the tag and a flag
stating whether or not a compound type is a complete type.
rdar://10652330
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147651 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a combined-away node and the result of the combine isn't substantially
smaller than the input, it's just canonicalized. This is the first part
of a significant (7%) performance gain for Snappy's hot decompression
loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147604 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The register allocators don't currently support adding reserved
registers while they are running. Extend the MRI API to keep track of
the set of reserved registers when register allocation started.
Target hooks like hasFP() and needsStackRealignment() can look at this
set to avoid reserving more registers during register allocation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147577 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before we'd get:
$ clang t.c
fatal error: error in backend: Invalid operand for inline asm constraint 'i'!
Now we get:
$ clang t.c
t.c:16:5: error: invalid operand for inline asm constraint 'i'!
"movq (%4), %%mm0\n"
^
Which at least gets us the inline asm that is the problem.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147502 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This can only happen if the set of reserved registers changes during
register allocation.
<rdar://problem/10625436>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147486 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The failure seen on win32, when i64 type is illegal.
It happens on stage of conversion VECTOR_SHUFFLE to BUILD_VECTOR.
The failure message is:
llc: SelectionDAG.cpp:784: void VerifyNodeCommon(llvm::SDNode*): Assertion `(I->getValueType() == EltVT || (EltVT.isInteger() && I->getValueType().isInteger() && EltVT.bitsLE(I->getValueType()))) && "Wrong operand type!"' failed.
I added a special test that checks vector shuffle on win32.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147445 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The failure seen on win32, when i64 type is illegal.
It happens on stage of conversion VECTOR_SHUFFLE to BUILD_VECTOR.
The failure message is:
llc: SelectionDAG.cpp:784: void VerifyNodeCommon(llvm::SDNode*): Assertion `(I->getValueType() == EltVT || (EltVT.isInteger() && I->getValueType().isInteger() && EltVT.bitsLE(I->getValueType()))) && "Wrong operand type!"' failed.
I added a special test that checks vector shuffle on win32.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Promotion of the mask operand needs to be done using PromoteTargetBoolean, and not padded with garbage.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147309 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
