RISBG has three 8-bit operands (I3, I4 and I5). I'd originally
restricted all three to 6 bits, since that's the only range we intended
to use at the time. However, the top bit of I4 acts as a "zero" flag for
RISBG, while the top bit of I3 acts as a "test" flag for RNSBG & co.
This patch therefore allows them to have the full 8-bit range.
I've left the fifth operand as a 6-bit value for now since the
upper 2 bits have no defined meaning.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186070 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
predecessors of the two blocks it is attempting to merge supply the
same incoming values to any phi in the successor block. This change
allows merging in the case where there is one or more incoming values
that are undef. The undef values are rewritten to match the non-undef
value that flows from the other edge. Patch by Mark Lacey.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186069 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MF is normally initialized in AsmPrinter::SetupMachineFunction, but if the file
contains only globals (no functions), then we need this to be initialized
because, when encountering an error, lowerConstant() references it.
This should fix the non-deterministic failures of
test/CodeGen/X86/nonconst-static-iv.ll, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186068 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When computing currently-live registers, the register scavenger excludes undef
uses. As a result, undef uses are ignored when computing the restore points of
registers spilled into the emergency slots. While the register scavenger
normally excludes from consideration, when scavenging, registers used by the
current instruction, we need to not exclude undef uses. Otherwise, we might end
up requiring more emergency spill slots than we have (in the case where the
undef use *is* the currently-spilled register).
Another bug found by llvm-stress.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186067 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Without the changes introduced into this patch, if TRE saw any allocas at all,
TRE would not perform TRE *or* mark callsites with the tail marker.
Because TRE runs after mem2reg, this inadequacy is not a death sentence. But
given a callsite A without escaping alloca argument, A may not be able to have
the tail marker placed on it due to a separate callsite B having a write-back
parameter passed in via an argument with the nocapture attribute.
Assume that B is the only other callsite besides A and B only has nocapture
escaping alloca arguments (*NOTE* B may have other arguments that are not passed
allocas). In this case not marking A with the tail marker is unnecessarily
conservative since:
1. By assumption A has no escaping alloca arguments itself so it can not
access the caller's stack via its arguments.
2. Since all of B's escaping alloca arguments are passed as parameters with
the nocapture attribute, we know that B does not stash said escaping
allocas in a manner that outlives B itself and thus could be accessed
indirectly by A.
With the changes introduced by this patch:
1. If we see any escaping allocas passed as a capturing argument, we do
nothing and bail early.
2. If we do not see any escaping allocas passed as captured arguments but we
do see escaping allocas passed as nocapture arguments:
i. We do not perform TRE to avoid PR962 since the code generator produces
significantly worse code for the dynamic allocas that would be created
by the TRE algorithm.
ii. If we do not return twice, mark call sites without escaping allocas
with the tail marker. *NOTE* This excludes functions with escaping
nocapture allocas.
3. If we do not see any escaping allocas at all (whether captured or not):
i. If we do not have usage of setjmp, mark all callsites with the tail
marker.
ii. If there are no dynamic/variable sized allocas in the function,
attempt to perform TRE on all callsites in the function.
Based off of a patch by Nick Lewycky.
rdar://14324281.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186057 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I had thought that these tests could be target-neutral, but in practice this is
not the case (on some targets, like Hexagon and Darwin), they trigger an assert
(a different assert than the one that r186044 fixes).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186051 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For some reason, the Hexagon backend does not reject these invalid static
initializer expressions, but instead crashes in AsmPrinter::EmitGlobalConstant.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186045 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A non-constant-foldable static initializer expression containing insertvalue or
extractvalue had been causing an assert:
Constants.cpp:1971: Assertion `FC && "ExtractValue constant expr couldn't be
folded!"' failed.
Now we report a more-sensible "Unsupported expression in static initializer"
error instead.
Fixes PR15417.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is not reliable to depend on the output of llvm_unreachable. The original
change will have proper tests when llvm-ar moves to lib/Object (soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186043 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is no lib/Archive anymore and some archive tests were in test/Archive and
others in test/Object. Since archive is just one of the formats supported by
lib/Object, test/Object is probably the best location.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186038 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch from Игорь Пашев (I do hope we support utf-8 commit messages; I
also hope he'll forgive me for transliterating it as Igor Pashev in
case things go horribly wrong).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186034 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The status function is already using a syscall that returns the file size.
Remember it and implement file_size as a simple wrapper.
No functionally change, but clients that already use status now can avoid
calling file_size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186016 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Enough for the radeonsi driver to use it for calculating derivatives.
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186012 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In discussing this change with Bill Schmidt, it was decided that the original
comment about negative FIs was incorrect. We'll still exclude them for now, but
now with a more-accurate explanation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186005 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently ARM is the only backend that supports FMA instructions (for at least some subtargets) but does not implement this virtual, so FMAs are never generated except from explicit fma intrinsic calls. Apparently this is due to the fact that it supports both fused (one rounding step) and unfused (two rounding step) multiply + add instructions. This patch clarifies that this the case without changing behavior by implementing the virtual function to simply return false, as the default TargetLoweringBase version does.
It is possible that some cpus perform the fused version faster than the unfused version and vice-versa, so the function implementation should be revisited if hard data is found.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185994 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
