This allows an important optimization to be re-enabled.
- If all uses / defs of a split interval can be folded, give the interval a
low spill weight so it would not be picked in case spilling is needed (avoid
pushing other intervals in the same BB to be spilled).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@44601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When a live interval is being spilled, rather than creating short, non-spillable
intervals for every def / use, split the interval at BB boundaries. That is, for
every BB where the live interval is defined or used, create a new interval that
covers all the defs and uses in the BB.
This is designed to eliminate one common problem: multiple reloads of the same
value in a single basic block. Note, it does *not* decrease the number of spills
since no copies are inserted so the split intervals are *connected* through
spill and reloads (or rematerialization). The newly created intervals can be
spilled again, in that case, since it does not span multiple basic blocks, it's
spilled in the usual manner. However, it can reuse the same stack slot as the
previously split interval.
This is currently controlled by -split-intervals-at-bb.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@44198 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MachineOperand auxInfo. Previous clunky implementation uses an external map
to track sub-register uses. That works because register allocator uses
a new virtual register for each spilled use. With interval splitting (coming
soon), we may have multiple uses of the same register some of which are
of using different sub-registers from others. It's too fragile to constantly
update the information.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@44104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Turn a store folding instruction into a load folding instruction. e.g.
xorl %edi, %eax
movl %eax, -32(%ebp)
movl -36(%ebp), %eax
orl %eax, -32(%ebp)
=>
xorl %edi, %eax
orl -36(%ebp), %eax
mov %eax, -32(%ebp)
This enables the unfolding optimization for a subsequent instruction which will
also eliminate the newly introduced store instruction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@43192 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Turn this:
movswl %ax, %eax
movl %eax, -36(%ebp)
xorl %edi, -36(%ebp)
into
movswl %ax, %eax
xorl %edi, %eax
movl %eax, -36(%ebp)
by unfolding the load / store xorl into an xorl and a store when we know the
value in the spill slot is available in a register. This doesn't change the
number of instructions but reduce the number of times memory is accessed.
Also unfold some load folding instructions and reuse the value when similar
situation presents itself.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@42947 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(almost) a register copy. However, it always coalesced to the register of the
RHS (the super-register). All uses of the result of a EXTRACT_SUBREG are sub-
register uses which adds subtle complications to load folding, spiller rewrite,
etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@42899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- If the defs of a spilled rematerializable MI are dead after the spill store is deleted, delete
the def MI as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@41086 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
no more uses within the MBB and the spilled value isn't live out of the MBB.
Then it's safe to delete the spill store.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@41069 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with a general target hook to identify rematerializable instructions. Some
instructions are only rematerializable with specific operands, such as loads
from constant pools, while others are always rematerializable. This hook
allows both to be identified as being rematerializable with the same
mechanism.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@37644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code sequence before the spiller is something like:
= tMOVrr
%reg1117 = tMOVrr
%reg1078 = tLSLri %reg1117, 2
The it starts spilling:
%r0 = tRestore <fi#5>, 0
%r1 = tRestore <fi#7>, 0
%r1 = tMOVrr %r1<kill>
tSpill %r1, <fi#5>, 0
%reg1078 = tLSLri %reg1117, 2
It restores the value while processing the first tMOVrr. At this point, the
spiller remembers fi#5 is available in %r0. Next it processes the second move.
It restores the source before the move and spills the result afterwards. The
move becomes a noop and is deleted. However, a spill has been inserted and that
should invalidate reuse of %r0 for fi#5 and add reuse of %r1 for fi#5.
Therefore, %reg1117 (which is also assigned fi#5) should get %r1, not %r0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@34039 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
