When dumping the DAG for a fatal 'Cannot select' back-end error, also
provide the name of the function the construct is in. Useful when dealing
with large testcases, as the next step is to llvm-extract the function
in question to get a small(er) testcase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160152 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Make sure the tblgen'erated asm matcher correctly returns numoperands+1
as the ErrorInfo when the problem was that there weren't enough operands
specified.
rdar://9142751
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160144 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the input vector, it can be bigger (this is helpful for powerpc where <2 x i16>
is a legal vector type but i16 isn't a legal type, IIRC). However this wasn't
being taken into account by ExpandRes_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, causing PR13220.
Lightly tweaked version of a patch by Michael Liao.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160116 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
%shr = lshr i64 %key, 3
%0 = load i64* %val, align 8
%sub = add i64 %0, -1
%and = and i64 %sub, %shr
ret i64 %and
to:
%shr = lshr i64 %key, 3
%0 = load i64* %val, align 8
%sub = add i64 %0, 2305843009213693951
%and = and i64 %sub, %shr
ret i64 %and
The demanded bit optimization is actually a pessimization because add -1 would
be codegen'ed as a sub 1. Teach the demanded constant shrinking optimization
to check for negated constant to make sure it is actually reducing the width
of the constant.
rdar://11793464
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160101 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
def Pat<...>;
Results in 'record name is not a string!' diagnostic. Not the best,
but the lack of location information moves it from not very helpful
into completely useless. We're in the Record class when throwing the
error, so just add the location info directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160098 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is safe if CPSR is killed or re-defined.
When we are done with the basic block, check whether CPSR is live-out.
Do not optimize away cmp if CPSR is live-out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160090 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When WriteFragmentData() case FT_align called
Asm.getBackend().writeNopData() is called, nothing
is done since Mips implementation of writeNopData just
returned "true".
For some reason this has not caused problems in 32 bit
mode, but in 64 bit mode it caused an assert when processing
multiple function units.
The test case included will assert without this patch. It
runs twice with different flags to prevent false positives
due to changes in code generation over time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160084 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Even though variable in question could not
be initialized before use, the code was such that
the compiler had no way of knowing that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
file buffer is null-terminated.
If the file is smaller than we thought, mmap will not allow dereferencing
past the pages that are enough to cover the actual file size,
even though we asked for a larger address range.
rdar://11612916
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160075 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r1025 = s/zext r1024, 4
r1026 = extract_subreg r1025, 4
to a copy:
r1026 = copy r1024
This is correct. However it uses TII->isCoalescableExtInstr() which can return
true for instructions which essentially does a sext_in_reg so this can end up
with an illegal copy where the source and destination register classes do not
match. Add a check to avoid it. Sorry, no test case possible at this time.
rdar://11849816
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160059 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Low order register of a double word register operand. Operands
are defined by the name of the variable they are marked with in
the inline assembler code. This is a way to specify that the
operand just refers to the low order register for that variable.
It is the opposite of modifier 'D' which specifies the high order
register.
Example:
main()
{
long long ll_input = 0x1111222233334444LL;
long long ll_val = 3;
int i_result = 0;
__asm__ __volatile__(
"or %0, %L1, %2"
: "=r" (i_result)
: "r" (ll_input), "r" (ll_val));
}
Which results in:
lui $2, %hi(_gp_disp)
addiu $2, $2, %lo(_gp_disp)
addiu $sp, $sp, -8
addu $2, $2, $25
sw $2, 0($sp)
lui $2, 13107
ori $3, $2, 17476 <-- Low 32 bits of ll_input
lui $2, 4369
ori $4, $2, 8738 <-- High 32 bits of ll_input
addiu $5, $zero, 3 <-- Low 32 bits of ll_val
addiu $2, $zero, 0 <-- High 32 bits of ll_val
#APP
or $3, $4, $5 <-- or i_result, high 32 ll_input, low 32 of ll_val
#NO_APP
addiu $sp, $sp, 8
jr $ra
If not direction is done for the long long for 32 bit variables results
in using the low 32 bits as ll_val shows.
There is an existing bug if 'L' or 'D' is used for the destination register
for 32 bit long longs in that the target value will be updated incorrectly
for the non-specified part unless explicitly set within the inline asm code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
