Since z has no setcc instruction as such, the choice of setBooleanContents
is a bit arbitrary. Currently it's set to ZeroOrOneBooleanContent,
so we produced a branch-free form when selecting between 0 and 1,
but not when selecting between 0 and -1. This patch handles the latter
case too.
At some point I'd like to measure whether it's better to use conditional
moves for constant selects on z196, but that's future work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196578 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The backend converts 64-bit ORs into subreg moves if the upper 32 bits
of one operand and the low 32 bits of the other are known to be zero.
It then tries to peel away redundant ANDs from the upper 32 bits.
Since AND masks are canonicalized to exclude known-zero bits,
the test ORs the mask and the known-zero bits together before
checking for redundancy. The problem was that it was using the
wrong node when checking for known-zero bits, so could drop ANDs
that were still needed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196267 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We would wrongly transform the testcase into the equivalent of an AND with 1.
The problem was that, when testing whether the shifted-in bits of the right
shift were significant, we used the width of the final zero-extended result
rather than the width of the shifted value.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I've no idea why I decided to handle TMxx differently from all the other
high/low logic operations, but it was a stupid thing to do. The high
registers aren't available as separate 32-bit registers on z10,
so subreg_h32 can't be used on a GR64 there.
I've normally been testing with z196 and with -O3 and so hadn't noticed
this until now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195473 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As on other hosts, the CPU identification instruction is priveleged,
so we need to look through /proc/cpuinfo. I copied the PowerPC way of
handling "generic".
Several tests were implicitly assuming z10 and so failed on z196.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
useAA significantly improves the handling of vector code that has TBAA
information attached. It also helps other cases, as shown by the testsuite
changes here. The only real downside I've seen is that it interferes with
MergeConsecutiveStores. The problem is that that optimization works top
down, starting at the first store in the chain, and looks for cases where
the chain result is only used by a single related store. These related
stores don't alias, so useAA will have rewritten all the later stores to
use a different chain input (typically the same one as the first store).
I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages though, so for now I've
just disabled alias analysis for the unaligned-01.ll test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193521 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Making useAA() default to true for SystemZ showed that the combiner alias
analysis wasn't handling volatile accesses. This hit many of the SystemZ
tests, but I arbitrarily picked one for the purpose of this patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193518 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Most SelectionDAG code drops the TBAA info when creating a new form of a
load and store (e.g. during legalization, or when converting a plain
load to an extending one). This patch tries to catch all cases where
the TBAA information can legitimately be carried over.
The patch adds alternative forms of getLoad() and getExtLoad() that take
a MachineMemOperand instead of individual fields. (The corresponding
getTruncStore() already exists.) The idea is to use the MachineMemOperand
forms when all fields are carried over (size, pointer info, isVolatile,
isNonTemporal, alignment and TBAA info). If some adjustment is being
made, e.g. to narrow the load, then we still pass the individual fields
but also pass the TBAA info.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193517 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The input to an RxSBG operation can be narrower as long as the upper bits
are don't care. This fixes a FIXME added in r192783.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192790 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We previously used the default expansion to SELECT_CC, which in turn would
expand to "LHI; BRC; LHI". In most cases it's better to use an IPM-based
sequence instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is really an extension of the current (shl (shr ...)) -> shl optimization.
The main difference is that certain upper bits must also not be demanded.
The motivating examples are the first two in the testcase, which occur
in llvmpipe output.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192783 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are no corresponding patterns for small immediates because they would
prevent the use of fused compare-and-branch instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191775 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Similar to low words, we can use the shorter LLIHL and LLIHH if it turns
out that the other half of the GR64 isn't live.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191750 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This just adds the basics necessary for allocating the upper words to
virtual registers (move, load and store). The move support is parameterised
in a way that makes it easy to handle zero extensions, but the associated
zero-extend patterns are added by a later patch.
The easiest way of testing this seemed to be add a new "h" register
constraint for high words. I don't expect the constraint to be useful
in real inline asms, but it should work, so I didn't try to hide it
behind an option.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191739 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove the command line argument "struct-path-tbaa" since we should not depend
on command line argument to decide which format the IR file is using. Instead,
we check the first operand of the tbaa tag node, if it is a MDNode, we treat
it as struct-path aware TBAA format, otherwise, we treat it as scalar TBAA
format.
When clang starts to use struct-path aware TBAA format no matter whether
struct-path-tbaa is no, and we can auto-upgrade existing bc files, the support
for scalar TBAA format can be dropped.
Existing testing cases are updated to use the struct-path aware TBAA format.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191538 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The backend tries to use block operations like MVC, NC, OC and XC for
simple scalar operations. For correctness reasons, it rejects any case
in which the regions might partially overlap. However, for performance
reasons, it should also reject cases where the regions might be equal,
since the instruction might then not use the fast path.
This fixes a performance regression seen in bzip2. We may want to limit
the optimisation even more in future, or even remove it entirely, but I'll
try with this for now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The backend previously folded offsets into PC-relative addresses
whereever possible. That's the right thing to do when the address
can be used directly in a PC-relative memory reference (using things
like LRL). But if we have a register-based memory reference and need
to load the PC-relative address separately, it's better to use an anchor
point that could be shared with other accesses to the same area of the
variable.
Fixes a FIXME.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191524 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190930 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The port originally had special patterns for extload, mapping them to the
same instructions as sextload. It seemed neater to have patterns that
match "an extension that is allowed to be signed" and "an extension that
is allowed to be unsigned".
This was originally meant to be a clean-up, but it does improve the handling
of promoted integers a little, as shown by args-06.ll.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The architecture has many comparison instructions, including some that
extend one of the operands. The signed comparison instructions use sign
extensions and the unsigned comparison instructions use zero extensions.
In cases where we had a free choice between signed or unsigned comparisons,
we were trying to decide at lowering time which would best fit the available
instructions, taking things like extension type into account. The code
to do that was getting increasingly hairy and was also making some bad
decisions. E.g. when comparing the result of two LLCs, it is better to use
CR rather than CLR, since CR can be fused with a branch while CLR can't.
This patch removes the lowering code and instead adds an operand to
integer comparisons to say whether signed comparison is required,
whether unsigned comparison is required, or whether either is OK.
We can then leave the choice of instruction up to the normal isel code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190138 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For now this just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189819 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For now just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189469 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Lengths up to a certain threshold (currently 6 * 256) use a series of MVCs.
Lengths above that threshold use a loop to handle X*256 bytes followed
by a single MVC to handle the excess (if any). This loop will also be
needed in future when support for variable lengths is added.
Because the same tablegen classes are used to define MVC and CLC,
the patch also has the side-effect of defining a pseudo loop instruction
for CLC. That instruction isn't used yet (and wouldn't be handled correctly
if it were). I'm planning to use it soon though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189331 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
