It does, after all.
RemoveCopyByCommutingDef rewrites the uses of one particular value
number in A. It doesn't know how to rewrite phi uses, so there can't be
any.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DW_AT_GNU_template_name = 0x2110, not 0x2108. That would explain those
attr #0x2110 under the DW_TAG_GNU_template_template_param I'm seeing. Migrate
from documented values to reality.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139785 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is only one legitimate use remaining, in addIntervalsForSpills().
All other calls to hasPHIKill() are only used to update PHIKill flags.
The addIntervalsForSpills() function is part of the old spilling
framework, only used by linearscan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139783 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead, let HasOtherReachingDefs() test for defs in B that overlap any
phi-defs in A as well. This test is slightly different, but almost
identical.
A perfectly precise test would only check those phi-defs in A that are
reachable from AValNo.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139782 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The source live range is recomputed using shrinkToUses() which does
handle phis correctly. The hasPHIKill() condition was relevant in the
old days when ReMaterializeTrivialDef() tried to recompute the live
range itself.
The shrinkToUses() function will mark the original def as dead when no
more uses and phi kills remain. It is then removed by
runOnMachineFunction().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139781 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is conservatively correct to keep the hasPHIKill flags, even after
deleting PHI-defs.
The calculation can be very expensive after taildup has created a
quadratic number of indirectbr edges in the CFG, and the hasPHIKill flag
isn't used for anything after RenumberValues().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139780 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
An improper SlotIndex->VNInfo lookup was leading to unsafe copy removal.
Fixes PR10920 401.bzip2 miscompile with no IV rewrite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
will ignore the erasedOnReboot option, and properly escape the
backslash in "C:\TEMP". Thanks to Aaron and Francois.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clean up register list handling in general a bit to explicitly check things
like all the registers being from the same register class.
rdar://8883573
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139707 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
THe LRE_DidCloneVirtReg callback may be called with vitual registers
that RAGreedy doesn't even know about yet. In that case, there are no
data structures to update.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139702 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When a back-copy is hoisted to the nearest common dominator, keep
looking up the dominator tree for a less loopy dominator, and place the
back-copy there instead.
Don't do this when a single existing back-copy dominates all the others.
Assume the client knows what he is doing, and keep the dominating
back-copy.
This prevents us from hoisting back-copies into loops in most cases. If
a value is defined in a loop with multiple exits, we may still hoist
back-copies into that loop. That is the speed/size tradeoff.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139698 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
