x == -y --> x+y == 0
x != -y --> x+y != 0
On x86, the generated code goes from
negl %esi
cmpl %esi, %edi
je .LBB0_2
to
addl %esi, %edi
je .L4
This case is correctly handled for ARM with "cmn".
Patch by Manman Ren.
rdar://11245199
PR12545
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155739 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Target specific types should not be vectorized. As a practical matter,
these types are already register matched (at least in the x86 case),
and codegen does not always work correctly (at least in the ppc case,
and this is not worth fixing because ppc_fp128 is currently broken and
will probably go away soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155729 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Model FPSW (the FPU status word) as a register.
* Add ISel patterns for the FUCOM*, FNSTSW and SAHF instructions.
* During Legalize/Lowering, build a node sequence to transfer the comparison
result from FPSW into EFLAGS. If you're wondering about the right-shift: That's
an implicit sub-register extraction (%ax -> %ah) which is handled later on by
the instruction selector.
Fixes PR6679. Patch by Christoph Erhardt!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155704 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instead of getAggregateElement. This has the advantage of being
more consistent and allowing higher-level constant folding to
procede even if an inner extract element cannot be folded.
Make ConstantFoldInstruction call ConstantFoldConstantExpression
on the instruction's operands, making it more consistent with
ConstantFoldConstantExpression itself. This makes sure that
ConstantExprs get TargetData-aware folding before being handed
off as operands for further folding.
This causes more expressions to be folded, but due to a known
shortcoming in constant folding, this currently has the side effect
of stripping a few more nuw and inbounds flags in the non-targetdata
side of constant-fold-gep.ll. This is mostly harmless.
This fixes rdar://11324230.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155682 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DAGCombine strangeness may result in multiple loads from the same
offset. They both may try to glue themselves to another load. We could
insist that the redundant loads glue themselves to each other, but the
beter fix is to bail out from bad gluing at the time we detect it.
Fixes rdar://11314175: BuildSchedUnits assert.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155668 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On some cores it's a bad idea for performance to mix VFP and NEON instructions
and since these patterns are NEON anyway, the NEON load should be used.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155630 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
elements to minimize the number of multiplies required to compute the
final result. This uses a heuristic to attempt to form near-optimal
binary exponentiation-style multiply chains. While there are some cases
it misses, it seems to at least a decent job on a very diverse range of
inputs.
Initial benchmarks show no interesting regressions, and an 8%
improvement on SPASS. Let me know if any other interesting results (in
either direction) crop up!
Credit to Richard Smith for the core algorithm, and helping code the
patch itself.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the feature set of v7a. This comes about if the user specifies something like
-arch armv7 -mcpu=cortex-m3. We shouldn't be generating instructions such as
uxtab in this case.
rdar://11318438
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When an instruction match is found, but the subtarget features it
requires are not available (missing floating point unit, or thumb vs arm
mode, for example), issue a diagnostic that identifies what the feature
mismatch is.
rdar://11257547
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
constants in C++11 mode. I have no idea why it required such particular
circumstances to get here, the code seems clearly to rely upon unchecked
assumptions.
Specifically, when we decide to form an index into a struct type, we may
have gone through (at least one) zero-length array indexing round, which
would have left the offset un-adjusted, and thus not necessarily valid
for use when indexing the struct type.
This is just an canonicalization step, so the correct thing is to refuse
to canonicalize nonsensical GEPs of this form. Implemented, and test
case added.
Fixes PR12642. Pair debugged and coded with Richard Smith. =] I credit
him with most of the debugging, and preventing me from writing the wrong
code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155466 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
using the pattern (vbroadcast (i32load src)). In some cases, after we generate
this pattern new users are added to the load node, which prevent the selection
of the blend pattern. This commit provides fallback patterns which perform
in-vector broadcast (using in-vector vbroadcast in AVX2 and pshufd on AVX1).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155437 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
on X86 Atom. Some of our tests failed because the tail merging part of
the BranchFolding pass was creating new basic blocks which did not
contain live-in information. When the anti-dependency code in the Post-RA
scheduler ran, it would sometimes rename the register containing
the function return value because the fact that the return value was
live-in to the subsequent block had been lost. To fix this, it is necessary
to run the RegisterScavenging code in the BranchFolding pass.
This patch makes sure that the register scavenging code is invoked
in the X86 subtarget only when post-RA scheduling is being done.
Post RA scheduling in the X86 subtarget is only done for Atom.
This patch adds a new function to the TargetRegisterClass to control
whether or not live-ins should be preserved during branch folding.
This is necessary in order for the anti-dependency optimizations done
during the PostRASchedulerList pass to work properly when doing
Post-RA scheduling for the X86 in general and for the Intel Atom in particular.
The patch adds and invokes the new function trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc()
instead of using the existing requiresRegisterScavenging().
It changes BranchFolding.cpp to call trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of
requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes the all the targets that
implemented requiresRegisterScavenging() to also implement
trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc().
It adds an assertion in the Post RA scheduler to make sure that post RA
liveness information is available when it is needed.
It changes the X86 break-anti-dependencies test to use –mcpu=atom, in order
to avoid running into the added assertion.
Finally, this patch restores the use of anti-dependency checking
(which was turned off temporarily for the 3.1 release) for
Intel Atom in the Post RA scheduler.
Patch by Andy Zhang!
Thanks to Jakob and Anton for their reviews.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
test suite failures. The failures occur at each stage, and only get
worse, so I'm reverting all of them.
Please resubmit these patches, one at a time, after verifying that the
regression test suite passes. Never submit a patch without running the
regression test suite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155372 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Original commit message:
Defer some shl transforms to DAGCombine.
The shl instruction is used to represent multiplication by a constant
power of two as well as bitwise left shifts. Some InstCombine
transformations would turn an shl instruction into a bit mask operation,
making it difficult for later analysis passes to recognize the
constsnt multiplication.
Disable those shl transformations, deferring them to DAGCombine time.
An 'shl X, C' instruction is now treated mostly the same was as 'mul X, C'.
These transformations are deferred:
(X >>? C) << C --> X & (-1 << C) (When X >> C has multiple uses)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1) & (-1 << C2) (When C2 > C1)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X >>? (C1-C2) & (-1 << C2) (When C1 > C2)
The corresponding exact transformations are preserved, just like
div-exact + mul:
(X >>?,exact C) << C --> X
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1)
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X >>?,exact (C1-C2)
The disabled transformations could also prevent the instruction selector
from recognizing rotate patterns in hash functions and cryptographic
primitives. I have a test case for that, but it is too fragile.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
