Move the FrameEntry::dumpInstructions down in the file at some
place where it can see the declarations of FDE and CIE.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230549 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the first commit in a small series aiming at making
debug_frame dump more useful (right now it prints a list of
opeartions without their operands).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230547 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Win64 epilogue structure is very restrictive, it permits a very
small number of opcodes and none of them are 'mov'.
This means that given:
mov %rbp, %rsp
pop %rbp
The mov isn't the epilogue, only the pop is. This is problematic unless
a frame pointer is present in which case we are free to do whatever we'd
like in the "body" of the function. If a frame pointer is present,
unwinding will undo the prologue operations in reverse order regardless
of the fact that we are at an instruction which is reseting the stack
pointer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change aligns globals to the next highest power of 2 bytes, up to a
maximum of 128. This makes it more likely that we will be able to compress
bit sets with a greater alignment. In many more cases, we can now take
advantage of a new optimization also introduced in this patch that removes
bit set checks if the bit set is all ones.
The 128 byte maximum was found to provide the best tradeoff between instruction
overhead and data overhead in a recent build of Chromium. It allows us to
remove ~2.4MB of instructions at the cost of ~250KB of data.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7873
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230540 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows clang-cl to self-host cleanly with no magic setup
steps required.
After this patch, all you have to do is set CC=CXX=clang-cl and
run cmake -G Ninja.
These changes only exist to support C++ features which are
unsupported in clang-cl, so regardless of whether the user
specifies they want to use them, we still have to disable them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(The change was landed in r230280 and caused the regression PR22674.
This version contains a fix and a test-case for PR22674).
When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.
This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.
Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic)
manifestation of the bug can be seen in
Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230533 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We had somehow accumulated a few target-specific SDAG nodes dealing with PPC64
TOC access that were referenced only in TableGen patterns. The associated
(pseudo-)instructions are used, but are being generated directly. NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230518 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With a diabolically crafted test case, we could recurse
through this code and return true instead of false.
The larger engineering crime is the use of magic numbers.
Added FIXME comments for those.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230515 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reapply r230248.
Teach the peephole optimizer to work with MMX instructions by adding
entries into the foldable tables. This covers folding opportunities not
handled during isel.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MMX_MOVD64rm zero-extends i32 load results into i64 registers.
The peephole optimizer will try to fold it in other MMX foldable
instructions, the wrong thing to do, since there's no MMX memory
instruction that loads from i32 and does implict zero extension.
Remove 'canFoldAsLoad' from MOVD64rm in order to prevent such folding.
The current MMX tests already test this, but since there are no MMX
instructions in the foldable tables yet, this did not trigger. This
commit prepares the addition of those instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230498 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Thumb-1 only allows SP-based LDR and STR to be word-sized, and SP-base LDR,
STR, and ADD only allow offsets that are a multiple of 4. Make some changes
to better make use of these instructions:
* Use word loads for anyext byte and halfword loads from the stack.
* Enforce 4-byte alignment on objects accessed in this way, to ensure that
the offset is valid.
* Do the same for objects whose frame index is used, in order to avoid having
to use more than one ADD to generate the frame index.
* Correct how many bits of offset we think AddrModeT1_s has.
Patch by John Brawn.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230496 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Gather and scatter instructions additionally write to one of the source operands - mask register.
In this case Gather has 2 destination values - the loaded value and the mask.
Till now we did not support code gen pattern for gather - the instruction was generated from
intrinsic only and machine node was hardcoded.
When we introduce the masked_gather node, we need to select instruction automatically,
in the standard way.
I added a flag "hasTwoExplicitDefs" that allows to handle 2 destination operands.
(Some code in the X86InstrFragmentsSIMD.td is commented out, just to split one big
patch in many small patches)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230471 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change fixes the FIXME that you recently added when you committed
(a modified version of) my patch. When `InstCombine` combines a load and
store of an pointer to those of an equivalently-sized integer, it currently
drops any `!nonnull` metadata that might be present. This change replaces
`!nonnull` metadata with `!range !{ 1, -1 }` metadata instead.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7621
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is possible for the atomic routines to be provided by the compiler without
requiring any additional libraries. Check if that is the case before checking
for a library.
Patch by Matt Glazar!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230452 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since r199356, we've printed a warning when dropping debug info.
r225562 started crashing on that, since it registered a diagnostic
handler that only expected errors. This fixes the handler to expect
other severities. As a side effect, it now prints "error: " at the
start of error messages, similar to `llvm-as`.
There was a testcase for r199356, but it only really checked the
assembler. Move `test/Bitcode/drop-debug-info.ll` to `test/Assembler`,
and introduce `test/Bitcode/drop-debug-info.3.5.ll` (and companion
`.bc`) to test the bitcode reader.
Note: tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp has an equivalent bug, but I'm not sure
what the best fix is there. I'll file a PR.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230416 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Like r230414, add bitcode support including backwards compatibility, for
an explicit type parameter to GEP.
At the suggestion of Duncan I tried coalescing the two older bitcodes into a
single new bitcode, though I did hit a wrinkle: I couldn't figure out how to
create an explicit abbreviation for a record with a variable number of
arguments (the indicies to the gep). This means the discriminator between
inbounds and non-inbounds gep is a full variable-length field I believe? Is my
understanding correct? Is there a way to create such an abbreviation? Should I
just use two bitcodes as before?
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7736
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230415 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I've taken my best guess at this, but I've cargo culted in places & so
explanations/corrections would be great.
This seems to pass all the tests (check-all, covering clang and llvm) so I
believe that pretty well exercises both the backwards compatibility and common
(same version) compatibility given the number of checked in bitcode files we
already have. Is that a reasonable approach to testing here? Would some more
explicit tests be desired?
1) is this the right way to do back-compat in this case (looking at the number
of entries in the bitcode record to disambiguate between the old schema and
the new?)
2) I don't quite understand the logarithm logic to choose the encoding type of
the type parameter in the abbreviation description, but I found another
instruction doing the same thing & it seems to work. Is that the right
approach?
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7655
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds support for the QPX vector instruction set, which is used by the
enhanced A2 cores on the IBM BG/Q supercomputers. QPX vectors are 256 bytes
wide, holding 4 double-precision floating-point values. Boolean values, modeled
here as <4 x i1> are actually also represented as floating-point values
(essentially { -1, 1 } for { false, true }). QPX shares many features with
Altivec and VSX, but is distinct from both of them. One major difference is
that, instead of adding completely-separate vector registers, QPX vector
registers are extensions of the scalar floating-point registers (lane 0 is the
corresponding scalar floating-point value). The operations supported on QPX
vectors mirrors that supported on the scalar floating-point values (with some
additional ones for permutations and logical/comparison operations).
I've been maintaining this support out-of-tree, as part of the bgclang project,
for several years. This is not the entire bgclang patch set, but is most of the
subset that can be cleanly integrated into LLVM proper at this time. Adding
this to the LLVM backend is part of my efforts to rebase bgclang to the current
LLVM trunk, but is independently useful (especially for codes that use LLVM as
a JIT in library form).
The assembler/disassembler test coverage is complete. The CodeGen test coverage
is not, but I've included some tests, and more will be added as follow-up work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230413 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch unifies the comdat and non-comdat code paths. By doing this
it add missing features to the comdat side and removes the fixed
section assumptions from the non-comdat side.
In ELF there is no one true section for "4 byte mergeable" constants.
We are better off computing the required properties of the section
and asking the context for it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230411 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When you use generator expressions in a library sources list,
and then later access the SOURCES property, the OLD behavior
(CMake 3.0 and earlier) would not include these expressions in
the SOURCES property. The NEW behavior (starting in CMake 3.1)
is that they do include the generator expressions in the SOURCES
property.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7870
Reviewed By: Chris Bieneman
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230396 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The builder is based on a layout algorithm that tries to keep members of
small bit sets together. The new layout compresses Chromium's bit sets to
around 15% of their original size.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7796
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230394 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is still gcroot vs gc.statepoint agnostic. I'm just trying to clarify the general documentation at this point.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is no need to open-code the alignment calculation, we have a
handy RoundUpToAlignment function which "Does The Right Thing (TM)".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230392 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
