This is similar to implicit register operands. MC doesn't understand
register liveness and call clobbers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148437 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When set, this bit indicates that a register is completely defined by
the value of its sub-registers.
Use the CoveredBySubRegs property to infer which super-registers are
call-preserved given a list of callee-saved registers. For example, the
ARM registers D8-D15 are callee-saved. This now automatically implies
that Q4-Q7 are call-preserved.
Conversely, Win64 callees save XMM6-XMM15, but the corresponding
YMM6-YMM15 registers are not call-preserved because they are not fully
defined by their sub-registers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148363 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In CanXFormVExtractWithShuffleIntoLoad we assumed that EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT can be later handled by the DAGCombiner.
However, in some cases on AVX, the EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT is legalized to EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR + EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, which
currently is not handled by the DAGCombiner. In this patch I added a check that we only extract from the XMM part.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148298 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We know that the blend instructions only use the MSB, so if the mask is
sign-extended then we can convert it into a SHL instruction. This is a
common pattern because the type-legalizer sign-extends the i1 type which
is used by the LLVM-IR for the condition.
Added a new optimization in SimplifyDemandedBits for SIGN_EXTEND_INREG -> SHL.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148225 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The registers are placed into the saved registers list in the reverse order,
which is why the original loop was written to loop backwards.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
lc: X86ISelLowering.cpp:6480: llvm::SDValue llvm::X86TargetLowering::LowerVECTOR_SHUFFLE(llvm::SDValue, llvm::SelectionDAG&) const: Assertion `V1.getOpcode() != ISD::UNDEF&& "Op 1 of shuffle should not be undef"' failed.
Added a test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Uses the pvArbitrary slot of the TIB, which is reserved for applications. We
only support frames with a static size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Restore the (obviously wrong) behavior from before r147938 without relying on
undefined behavior. Add a fat FIXME note.
This should fix nightly tester failures.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148030 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In att style asm syntax memory operand size is derived from suffix attached with mnemonic. In intel style asm syntax it is part of memory operand hence predicate method check is required to select appropriate instruction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148006 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
same pattern. We already had this pattern is a few places, but others
tried to make a rough approximation of an actual DAG structure. As not
everywhere went to this trouble, nothing could rely on this being done.
In fact, I've checked all references to these node Ids, and the ones
that are using the topo-sort properties are actually satisfied with
a strict-weak-ordering. The requirement appears to be that Use >= Def.
I've added a big blurb of comments to this bit of the transform to
clarify why the order is so important for the next reader of the code.
I'm starting with this change as it is very small, and trivially
reverted if something breaks or the >= above really does need to be >.
If that proves the case, we can hide the problem by reverting this
patch, but the problem exists elsewhere as well, and so a more
comprehensive solution will be needed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148001 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This uses TLS slot 90, which actually belongs to JavaScriptCore. We only support
frames with static size
Patch by Brian Anderson.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147960 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
hoped this would revive one of the llvm-gcc selfhost build bots, but it
didn't so it doesn't appear that my transform is the culprit.
If anyone else is seeing failures, please let me know!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147957 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
strange build bot failures that look like a miscompile into an infloop.
I'll investigate this tomorrow, but I'd both like to know whether my
patch is the culprit, and get the bots back to green.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147945 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8