Summary:
Currently, it supports generating, but not parsing, this expression.
Test added as well.
Test Plan: New test added, no regressions due to this.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6672
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224415 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add coverage in `llvm-lto` for the API exposed by libLTO to create
modules in local contexts.
The goal here isn't to test the symbol-related API extensively, just to
confirm that these modules work at all. (I'll be shifting code around
soon that should be NFC and I realized there was no test coverage.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can always choose an value for undef which might cause %V to shift
out an important bit except for one case, when %V is zero.
However, shl behaves like an identity function when the right hand side
is zero.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224405 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The type promotion helper does not support vector type, so when make
such it does not kick in in such cases.
Original commit message:
[CodeGenPrepare] Move sign/zero extensions near loads using type promotion.
This patch extends the optimization in CodeGenPrepare that moves a sign/zero
extension near a load when the target can combine them. The optimization may
promote any operations between the extension and the load to make that possible.
Although this optimization may be beneficial for all targets, in particular
AArch64, this is enabled for X86 only as I have not benchmarked it for other
targets yet.
** Context **
Most targets feature extended loads, i.e., loads that perform a zero or sign
extension for free. In that context it is interesting to expose such pattern in
CodeGenPrepare so that the instruction selection pass can form such loads.
Sometimes, this pattern is blocked because of instructions between the load and
the extension. When those instructions are promotable to the extended type, we
can expose this pattern.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(i8* %addr1, i32* %addr2, i8 %a, i32 %b) {
%ld = load i8* %addr1
%zextld = zext i8 %ld to i32
%ld2 = load i32* %addr2
%add = add nsw i32 %ld2, %zextld
%sextadd = sext i32 %add to i64
%zexta = zext i8 %a to i32
%addza = add nsw i32 %zexta, %zextld
%sextaddza = sext i32 %addza to i64
%addb = add nsw i32 %b, %zextld
%sextaddb = sext i32 %addb to i64
call void @dummy(i64 %sextadd, i64 %sextaddza, i64 %sextaddb)
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on x86_64:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movl (%rsi), %es # plain load
addl %eax, %esi # 32-bit add
movslq %esi, %rdi # sign extend the result of add
movzbl %dl, %edx # zero extend the first argument
addl %eax, %edx # 32-bit add
movslq %edx, %rsi # sign extend the result of add
addl %eax, %ecx # 32-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the result of add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 7.45 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
Now, by promoting the additions to form more extended loads we would generate:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movslq (%rsi), %rdi # sign-extended load
addq %rax, %rdi # 64-bit add
movzbl %dl, %esi # zero extend the first argument
addq %rax, %rsi # 64-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the second argument
addq %rax, %rdx # 64-bit add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 6.15 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
This kind of sequences happen a lot on code using 32-bit indexes on 64-bit
architectures.
Note: The throughput numbers are similar on Sandy Bridge and Haswell.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid the penalty of all these sign/zero extensions, we merge them in the
loads at the beginning of the chain of computation by promoting all the chain of
computation on the extended type. The promotion is done if and only if we do not
introduce new extensions, i.e., if we do not degrade the code quality.
To achieve this, we extend the existing “move ext to load” optimization with the
promotion mechanism introduced to match larger patterns for addressing mode
(r200947).
The idea of this extension is to perform the following transformation:
ext(promotableInst1(...(promotableInstN(load))))
=>
promotedInst1(...(promotedInstN(ext(load))))
The promotion mechanism in that optimization is enabled by a new TargetLowering
switch, which is off by default. In other words, by default, the optimization
performs the “move ext to load” optimization as it was before this patch.
** Performance **
Configuration: x86_64: Ivy Bridge fixed at 2900MHz running OS X 10.10.
Tested Optimization Levels: O3/Os
Tests: llvm-testsuite + externals.
Results:
- No regression beside noise.
- Improvements:
CINT2006/473.astar: ~2%
Benchmarks/PAQ8p: ~2%
Misc/perlin: ~3%
The results are consistent for both O3 and Os.
<rdar://problem/18310086>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SwitchInst::getNumCases() returns unsinged, so using uint64_t to count cases
seems unnecessary.
Also fix a missing CHECK in the test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When a function gets replaced by `ModuleLinker`, drop superseded
subprograms. This ensures that the "first" subprogram pointing at a
function is the same one that `!dbg` references point at.
This is a stop-gap fix for PR21910. Notably, this fixes Release+Asserts
bootstraps that are currently asserting out in
`LexicalScopes::initialize()` due to the explicit instantiations in
`lib/IR/Dominators.cpp` eventually getting replaced by -argpromotion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224389 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SelectionDAG::isConsecutiveLoad() was not detecting consecutive loads
when the first load was offset from a base address.
This patch recognizes that pattern and subtracts the offset before comparing
the second load to see if it is consecutive.
The codegen change in the new test case improves from:
vmovsd 32(%rdi), %xmm0
vmovsd 48(%rdi), %xmm1
vmovhpd 56(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vmovhpd 40(%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
To:
vmovups 32(%rdi), %ymm0
An existing test case is also improved from:
vmovsd (%rdi), %xmm0
vmovsd 16(%rdi), %xmm1
vmovsd 24(%rdi), %xmm2
vunpcklpd %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm2[0]
vmovhpd 8(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm3
To:
vmovsd (%rdi), %xmm0
vmovsd 16(%rdi), %xmm1
vmovhpd 24(%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
vmovhpd 8(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
This patch fixes PR21771 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21771 ).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6642
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224379 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: As a side-quest for D6629 jvoung pointed out that I should use -verify-machineinstrs and this found a bug in x86-32's handling of EFLAGS for PUSHF/POPF. This patch fixes the use/def, and adds -verify-machineinstrs to all x86 tests which contain 'EFLAGS'. One exception: this patch leaves inline-asm-fpstack.ll as-is because it fails -verify-machineinstrs in a way unrelated to EFLAGS. This patch also modifies cmpxchg-clobber-flags.ll along the lines of what D6629 already does by also testing i386.
Test Plan: ninja check
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jvoung
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6687
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch extends the optimization in CodeGenPrepare that moves a sign/zero
extension near a load when the target can combine them. The optimization may
promote any operations between the extension and the load to make that possible.
Although this optimization may be beneficial for all targets, in particular
AArch64, this is enabled for X86 only as I have not benchmarked it for other
targets yet.
** Context **
Most targets feature extended loads, i.e., loads that perform a zero or sign
extension for free. In that context it is interesting to expose such pattern in
CodeGenPrepare so that the instruction selection pass can form such loads.
Sometimes, this pattern is blocked because of instructions between the load and
the extension. When those instructions are promotable to the extended type, we
can expose this pattern.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(i8* %addr1, i32* %addr2, i8 %a, i32 %b) {
%ld = load i8* %addr1
%zextld = zext i8 %ld to i32
%ld2 = load i32* %addr2
%add = add nsw i32 %ld2, %zextld
%sextadd = sext i32 %add to i64
%zexta = zext i8 %a to i32
%addza = add nsw i32 %zexta, %zextld
%sextaddza = sext i32 %addza to i64
%addb = add nsw i32 %b, %zextld
%sextaddb = sext i32 %addb to i64
call void @dummy(i64 %sextadd, i64 %sextaddza, i64 %sextaddb)
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on x86_64:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movl (%rsi), %es # plain load
addl %eax, %esi # 32-bit add
movslq %esi, %rdi # sign extend the result of add
movzbl %dl, %edx # zero extend the first argument
addl %eax, %edx # 32-bit add
movslq %edx, %rsi # sign extend the result of add
addl %eax, %ecx # 32-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the result of add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 7.45 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
Now, by promoting the additions to form more extended loads we would generate:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movslq (%rsi), %rdi # sign-extended load
addq %rax, %rdi # 64-bit add
movzbl %dl, %esi # zero extend the first argument
addq %rax, %rsi # 64-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the second argument
addq %rax, %rdx # 64-bit add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 6.15 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
This kind of sequences happen a lot on code using 32-bit indexes on 64-bit
architectures.
Note: The throughput numbers are similar on Sandy Bridge and Haswell.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid the penalty of all these sign/zero extensions, we merge them in the
loads at the beginning of the chain of computation by promoting all the chain of
computation on the extended type. The promotion is done if and only if we do not
introduce new extensions, i.e., if we do not degrade the code quality.
To achieve this, we extend the existing “move ext to load” optimization with the
promotion mechanism introduced to match larger patterns for addressing mode
(r200947).
The idea of this extension is to perform the following transformation:
ext(promotableInst1(...(promotableInstN(load))))
=>
promotedInst1(...(promotedInstN(ext(load))))
The promotion mechanism in that optimization is enabled by a new TargetLowering
switch, which is off by default. In other words, by default, the optimization
performs the “move ext to load” optimization as it was before this patch.
** Performance **
Configuration: x86_64: Ivy Bridge fixed at 2900MHz running OS X 10.10.
Tested Optimization Levels: O3/Os
Tests: llvm-testsuite + externals.
Results:
- No regression beside noise.
- Improvements:
CINT2006/473.astar: ~2%
Benchmarks/PAQ8p: ~2%
Misc/perlin: ~3%
The results are consistent for both O3 and Os.
<rdar://problem/18310086>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On X86, the Intel asm parser tries to match all memory operand sizes when
none is explicitly specified. For LEA, which doesn't really have a memory
operand (just a pointer one), this results in multiple successful matches,
one for each memory size. There's no error because it's same opcode, so
really, it's just one match. However, the tablegen'd matcher function
adds opcode/operands to the passed MCInst, and this results in multiple
duplicated operands.
This commit clears the MCInst in the tablegen'd matcher function.
We sometimes clear it when the match failed, so there's no expectation of
keeping the previous content anyway.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6670
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224347 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a fix for PR21709 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21709 ).
When we have 2 consecutive 16-byte loads that are merged into one 32-byte vector,
we can use a single 32-byte load instead.
But we don't do this for SandyBridge / IvyBridge because they have slower 32-byte memops.
We also don't bother using 32-byte *integer* loads on a machine that only has AVX1 (btver2)
because those operands would have to be split in half anyway since there is no support for
32-byte integer math ops.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6492
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224344 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This test was missing a `Debug Info Version` so it's `not grep` was
passing vacuously. Update it to CHECK for something useful at the same
time so it doesn't bitrot quite so easily in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224324 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The use of SP and PC in the register list for stores is deprecated on ARM
(ARM ARM A.8.8.199):
ARM deprecates the use of ARM instructions that include the SP or the PC in
the list.
Provide a deprecation warning from the assembler in the case that the syntax is
ever seen.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224319 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The PowerPC backend, somewhat embarrassingly, did not generate an
optimal-length sequence of instructions for a 32-bit bswap. While adding a
pattern for the bswap intrinsic to fix this would not have been terribly
difficult, doing so would not have addressed the real problem: we had been
generating poor code for many bit-permuting operations (by which I mean things
like byte-swap that permute the bits of one or more inputs around in various
ways). Here are some initial steps toward solving this deficiency.
Bit-permuting operations are represented, at the SDAG level, using ISD::ROTL,
SHL, SRL, AND and OR (mostly with constant second operands). Looking back
through these operations, we can build up a description of the bits in the
resulting value in terms of bits of one or more input values (and constant
zeros). For each bit, we compute the rotation amount from the original value,
and then group consecutive (value, rotation factor) bits into groups. Groups
sharing these attributes are then collected and sorted, and we can then
instruction select the entire permutation using a combination of masked
rotations (rlwinm), imm ands (andi/andis), and masked rotation inserts
(rlwimi).
The result is that instead of lowering an i32 bswap as:
rlwinm 5, 3, 24, 16, 23
rlwinm 4, 3, 24, 0, 7
rlwimi 4, 3, 8, 8, 15
rlwimi 5, 3, 8, 24, 31
rlwimi 4, 5, 0, 16, 31
we now produce:
rlwinm 4, 3, 8, 0, 31
rlwimi 4, 3, 24, 16, 23
rlwimi 4, 3, 24, 0, 7
and for the 'test6' example in the PowerPC/README.txt file:
unsigned test6(unsigned x) {
return ((x & 0x00FF0000) >> 16) | ((x & 0x000000FF) << 16);
}
we used to produce:
lis 4, 255
rlwinm 3, 3, 16, 0, 31
ori 4, 4, 255
and 3, 3, 4
and now we produce:
rlwinm 4, 3, 16, 24, 31
rlwimi 4, 3, 16, 8, 15
and, as a nice bonus, this fixes the FIXME in
test/CodeGen/PowerPC/rlwimi-and.ll.
This commit does not include instruction-selection for i64 operations, those
will come later.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Debug info marks the first instruction without the FrameSetup flag
as being the end of the function prologue. Any CFI instructions in the
middle of the function prologue would cause debug info to end the prologue
too early and worse, attach the line number of the CFI instruction, which
incidentally is often 0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224294 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
isKnownPredicate.
The motivation for this change is to optimize away checks in loops
like this:
limit = min(t, len)
for (i = 0 to limit)
if (i >= len || i < 0) throw_array_of_of_bounds();
a[i] = ...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6635
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact.
Test Plan: ninja check
Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
