This test checks that the symbols instrprof creates have appropriate
linkage. The tests already exist in clang in a slightly different form
from before we sunk profile generation into an LLVM pass, but that's
an awkward place for them now. I'll remove/simplify the clang versions
shortly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230383 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In this change:
- Put the getting started section first
- Create a dedicated section to document the built in collector strategies
- Move discuss of ShadowStack into new section
- Add placeholders for erlang, ocaml, and statepoint-example collectors
There will be many more changes following. I plan on full integrating the documentation for gc.statepoint and gc.root. I want to make it much clearer on how to get started and what users should expect in terms of effort.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Author: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Mon Feb 23 23:04:28 2015 +0000
Fix based on post-commit comment on D7816 & rL230177 - BUILD_VECTOR operand truncation was using the the BV's output scalar type instead of the input type.
and
Author: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Sun Feb 22 18:17:28 2015 +0000
[DagCombiner] Generalized BuildVector Vector Concatenation
The CONCAT_VECTORS combiner pass can transform the concat of two BUILD_VECTOR nodes into a single BUILD_VECTOR node.
This patch generalises this to support any number of BUILD_VECTOR nodes, and also permits UNDEF nodes to be included as well.
This was noticed as AVX vec128 -> vec256 canonicalization sometimes creates a CONCAT_VECTOR with a real vec128 lower and an vec128 UNDEF upper.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7816
as the root cause of PR22678 which is causing an assertion inside the DAG combiner.
I'll follow up to the main thread as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230358 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The reason why these large shift sizes happen is because OpaqueConstants
currently inhibit alot of DAG combining, but that has to be addressed in
another commit (like the proposal in D6946).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6940
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230355 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The logic is almost there already, with our special homogeneous aggregate
handling. Tweaking it like this allows front-ends to emit AAPCS compliant code
without ever having to count registers or add discarded padding arguments.
Only arrays of i32 and i64 are needed to model AAPCS rules, but I decided to
apply the logic to all integer arrays for more consistency.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230348 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r230062.
Debian stable (wheezy) ships still with cmake 2.8.9.
The commit broke my LLVM/Polly buildbot, to my knowledge our only Linux+cmake
buildbot.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For almost all node types, if the target requested custom lowering, and
LowerOperation returned its input, we'd treat the original node as legal. This
did not work, however, for many loads and stores, because they follow
slightly different code paths, and we did not account for the possibility of
LowerOperation returning its input at those call sites.
I think that we now handle this consistently everywhere. At the call sites in
LegalizeDAG, we used to assert in this case, so there's no functional change
for any existing code there. For the call sites in LegalizeVectorOps, this
really only affects whether or not we set Changed = true, but I think makes the
semantics clearer.
No test case here, but it will be covered by an upcoming PowerPC commit adding
QPX support.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230332 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: Separated some instruction and pseudo-instruction definitions from InstAlias definitions, added banner for pseudo-instructions and removed a redundant whitespace from a pseudo-instruction definition. No functional change.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7552
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When AddressSanitizer only a single dynamic alloca and no static allocas, due to an early exit from FunctionStackPoisoner::poisonStack we forget to unpoison the dynamic alloca. This patch fixes that.
Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D7810
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230316 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: Begin to add various address modes; including alloca.
Test Plan: Make sure there are no regressions in test-suite at O0/02 in mips32r1/r2
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: echristo, rfuhler, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6426
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230300 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a follow up to r230233 to fix something that I noticed by
inspection. The AddrModeT2_i8s4 addressing mode does not support
negative offsets. I spent a good chunk of the day trying to come up with
a testcase for this but was not successful. This addressing mode is used
to spill and restore GPRPair registers in Thumb2 code and that does not
happen often. We also make very limited used of negative offsets when
lowering frame indexes. I am going ahead with the change anyway, because
I am pretty confident that it is correct. I also added a missing assertion
to check that the low bits of the scaled offset are zero.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230297 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The bug was a result of getPreStartForExtend interpreting nsw/nuw
flags on an add recurrence more strongly than is legal. {S,+,X}<nsw>
implies S+X is nsw only if the backedge of the loop is taken at least
once.
NOTE: I had accidentally committed an unrelated change with the commit
message of this change in r230275 (r230275 was reverted in r230279).
This is the correct change for this commit message.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7808
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230291 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When debugging LTO issues with ld64, we use -save-temps to save the merged
optimized bitcode file, then invoke ld64 again on the single bitcode file to
speed up debugging code generation passes and ld64 stuff after code generation.
llvm linking a single bitcode file via lto_codegen_add_module will generate a
different bitcode file from the single input. With the newly-added
lto_codegen_set_module, we can make sure the destination module is the same as
the input.
lto_codegen_set_module will transfer the ownship of the module to code
generator.
rdar://19024554
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230290 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can only use 'add' in epilogues, 'lea' is not permitted unless we've
established a frame pointer in the prologue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230286 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This case is interesting because ScalarEvolutionExpander lowers min(a,
b) as ~max(~a,~b). I think the profitability heuristics can be made
more clever/aggressive, but this is a start.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7821
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.
This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.
Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic) manifestation
of the bug can be seen in Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.
NOTE: this change was landed with an incorrect commit message in
rL230275 and was reverted for that reason in rL230279. This commit
message is the correct one.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230280 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
230275 got committed with an incorrect commit message due to a mixup
on my side. Will re-land in a few moments with the correct commit
message.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230279 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch teaches the backend how to expand a double-half conversion into
a double-float conversion immediately followed by a float-half conversion.
We do this only under fast-math, and if float-half conversions are legal
for the target.
Added test CodeGen/X86/fastmath-float-half-conversion.ll
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7832
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230276 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The bug was a result of getPreStartForExtend interpreting nsw/nuw
flags on an add recurrence more strongly than is legal. {S,+,X}<nsw>
implies S+X is nsw only if the backedge of the loop is taken at least
once.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7808
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230275 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Prologue emission, in some cases, requires calls to a stack probe helper
function. The amount of stack to probe is passed as a register
argument in the Win64 ABI but the instruction sequence used is
pessimistic: it assumes that the number of bytes to probe is greater
than 4 GB.
Instead, select a more appropriate opcode depending on the number of
bytes we are going to probe.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
'mov' and 'lea' are equivalent when the displacement applied with 'lea'
is zero. However, 'mov' should encode smaller.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230269 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Front-ends could use global unnamed_addr to hold pointers to other
symbols, like @gotequivalent below:
@foo = global i32 42
@gotequivalent = private unnamed_addr constant i32* @foo
@delta = global i32 trunc (i64 sub (i64 ptrtoint (i32** @gotequivalent to i64),
i64 ptrtoint (i32* @delta to i64))
to i32)
The global @delta holds a data "PC"-relative offset to @gotequivalent,
an unnamed pointer to @foo. The darwin/x86-64 assembly output for this follows:
.globl _foo
_foo:
.long 42
.globl _gotequivalent
_gotequivalent:
.quad _foo
.globl _delta
_delta:
.long _gotequivalent-_delta
Since unnamed_addr indicates that the address is not significant, only
the content, we can optimize the case above by replacing pc-relative
accesses to "GOT equivalent" globals, by a PC relative access to the GOT
entry of the final symbol instead. Therefore, "delta" can contain a pc
relative relocation to foo's GOT entry and we avoid the emission of
"gotequivalent", yielding the assembly code below:
.globl _foo
_foo:
.long 42
.globl _delta
_delta:
.long _foo@GOTPCREL+4
There are a couple of advantages of doing this: (1) Front-ends that need
to emit a great deal of data to store pointers to external symbols could
save space by not emitting such "got equivalent" globals and (2) IR
constructs combined with this opt opens a way to represent GOT pcrel
relocations by using the LLVM IR, which is something we previously had
no way to express.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6922
rdar://problem/18534217
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230264 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When multiple regions start on the same line, llvm-cov was just
showing the count of the last one as the line count. This can be
confusing and misleading for things like one-liner loops, where the
count at the end isn't very interesting, or even "if" statements with
an opening brace at the end of the line.
Instead, use the maximum of all of the region start counts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230263 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This test failed in several buildbots, a bit unclear how that happen
since this was the previous behavior before r230248.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230258 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
