consistently by moving it out of lowering into dag combine.
Add some missing patterns for matching away extended versions of setcc_c.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122201 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
IsSymbolRefDifferenceFullyResolved, it turns out this does change behavior on
enough cases for x86-32 that I would rather wait a bit on it.
- In practice, we will want to change this eventually because it only means we
generate less relocations (it also eliminates the need for the horrible
'.set' hack that Darwin requires in some places).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122042 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the MCCodeEmitter, which seems like a better organization.
- Also, cleaned up some magic constants while in the area.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121953 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the output to the correct register. Fixes a hidden problem uncovered
by the last patch where we'd try to DAG combine our MVT::Other node
oddly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121358 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
as llc + llvm-mc. This time ELF is not changed and I tested that llvm-gcc
bootstrap on darwin10 using darwin9's assembler and linker.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121006 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
result. This allows us to compile:
void *test12(long count) {
return new int[count];
}
into:
test12:
movl $4, %ecx
movq %rdi, %rax
mulq %rcx
movq $-1, %rdi
cmovnoq %rax, %rdi
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
instead of:
test12:
movl $4, %ecx
movq %rdi, %rax
mulq %rcx
seto %cl
testb %cl, %cl
movq $-1, %rdi
cmoveq %rax, %rdi
jmp __Znam
Of course it would be even better if the regalloc inverted the cmov to 'cmovoq',
which would eliminate the need for the 'movq %rdi, %rax'.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
backend that they were all implemented except umul. This one fell back
to the default implementation that did a hi/lo multiply and compared the
top. Fix this to check the overflow flag that the 'mul' instruction
sets, so we can avoid an explicit test. Now we compile:
void *func(long count) {
return new int[count];
}
into:
__Z4funcl: ## @_Z4funcl
movl $4, %ecx ## encoding: [0xb9,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00]
movq %rdi, %rax ## encoding: [0x48,0x89,0xf8]
mulq %rcx ## encoding: [0x48,0xf7,0xe1]
seto %cl ## encoding: [0x0f,0x90,0xc1]
testb %cl, %cl ## encoding: [0x84,0xc9]
movq $-1, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0xc7,0xc7,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff]
cmoveq %rax, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0x0f,0x44,0xf8]
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
instead of:
__Z4funcl: ## @_Z4funcl
movl $4, %ecx ## encoding: [0xb9,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00]
movq %rdi, %rax ## encoding: [0x48,0x89,0xf8]
mulq %rcx ## encoding: [0x48,0xf7,0xe1]
testq %rdx, %rdx ## encoding: [0x48,0x85,0xd2]
movq $-1, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0xc7,0xc7,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff]
cmoveq %rax, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0x0f,0x44,0xf8]
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
Other than the silly seto+test, this is using the o bit directly, so it's going in the right
direction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120935 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Also adds a new POPCNT subtarget feature that is currently enabled if the target
supports SSE4.2 (nehalem) or SSE4A (barcelona).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
foo = a - b
.long foo
instead of just
.long a - b
First, on darwin9 64 bits the assembler produces the wrong result. Second,
if "a" is the end of the section all darwin assemblers (9, 10 and mc) will not
consider a - b to be a constant but will if the dummy foo is created.
Split how we handle these cases. The first one is something MC should take care
of. The second one has to be handled by the caller.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120889 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The user (i.e. whoever generated a call to the intrinsic in the first place) is
essentially asking for a particular instruction to be placed in the assembler.
If that instruction won't execute on the target machine, that's their problem
not ours. Two buildbots with processors that don't support SSE3 were barfing
on the apm.ll test in CodeGen/X86 because of this assertion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8