This means that our Registers are now ordered R7, R8, R9, R10, R12, ...
Not R1, R10, R11, R12, R2, R3, ...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@104745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
implementing pop with a linear search for a "best" element. The priority
queue was a neat idea, but in practice the comparison functions depend
on dynamic information.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@104718 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A Register with subregisters must also provide SubRegIndices for adressing the
subregisters. TableGen automatically inherits indices for sub-subregisters to
minimize typing.
CompositeIndices may be specified for the weirder cases such as the XMM sub_sd
index that returns the same register, and ARM NEON Q registers where both D
subregs have ssub_0 and ssub_1 sub-subregs.
It is now required that all subregisters are named by an index, and a future
patch will also require inherited subregisters to be named. This is necessary to
allow composite subregister indices to be reduced to a single index.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@104704 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A Register with subregisters must also provide SubRegIndices for adressing the
subregisters. TableGen automatically inherits indices for sub-subregisters to
minimize typing.
CompositeIndices may be specified for the weirder cases such as the XMM sub_sd
index that returns the same register, and ARM NEON Q registers where both D
subregs have ssub_0 and ssub_1 sub-subregs.
It is now required that all subregisters are named by an index, and a future
patch will also require inherited subregisters to be named. This is necessary to
allow composite subregister indices to be reduced to a single index.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@104654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If you have a setjmp/longjmp situation, it's possible for stack slot coloring to
reuse a stack slot before it's really dead. For instance, if we have something
like this:
1: y = g;
x = sigsetjmp(env, 0);
switch (x) {
case 1:
/* ... */
goto run;
case 0:
run:
do_run(); /* marked as "no return" */
break;
case 3:
if (...) {
/* ... */
goto run;
}
/* ... */
break;
}
2: g = y;
"y" may be put onto the stack, so the expression "g = y" is relying upon the
fact that the stack slot containing "y" isn't modified between (1) and (2). But
it can be, because of the "no return" calls in there. A longjmp might come back
with 3, modify the stack slot, and then go to case 0. And it's perfectly
acceptable to reuse the stack slot there because there's no CFG flow from case 3
to (2).
The fix is to disable certain optimizations in these situations. Ideally, we'd
disable them for all "returns twice" functions. But we don't support that
attribute. Check for "setjmp" and "sigsetjmp" instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@104640 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
are st(0). These can be encoded using an opcode for storing in st(0) or using
an opcode for storing in st(i), where i can also be 0. To allow testing with
the darwin assembler and get a matching binary the opcode for storing in st(0)
is now used. To do this the same logical trick is use from the darwin assembler
in converting things like this:
fmul %st(0), %st
into this:
fmul %st(0)
by looking for the second operand being X86::ST0 for specific floating point
mnemonics then removing the second X86::ST0 operand. This also has the add
benefit to allow things like:
fmul %st(1), %st
that llvm-mc did not assemble.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@104634 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8