refactored out of ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCond, which will be updated
to use this new utility routine soon.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102229 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
alignment to match what's used in clang and GCC for __alignof, rather
than trying to guess what Legalize is going to be doing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102206 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes a bug where calls inlined into an invoke would get
changed into an invoke but the array would keep pointing to
the (now dead) call. The improved inliner behavior is still
disabled for now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add the instruction pointer value for debuggability.
We now get dump output that looks like this:
Call graph node for function: 'f1'<<0x1017086b0>> #uses=1
CS<0x1017046f8> calls external node
Call graph node for function: '_ZNSt6vectorIdSaIdEEC1EmRKdRKS0_'<<0x1017086f0>> #uses=1
CS<0x0> calls external node
Call graph node for function: 'f4'<<0x1017087a0>> #uses=1
CS<0x101708c88> calls function 'f3'
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102194 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
misses an opportunity to fold add operands, but folds them
after LSR has separated them out. This fixes rdar://7886751.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102157 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that appear in the SCC as a result of inlining as candidates
for inlining. Change this so that it *does* consider call
sites that change from being indirect to being direct as a
result of inlining. This allows it to completely
"devirtualize" the testcase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the definition of the nsw and nuw flags to make use of it.
nsw was introduced to help optimizers answer yes to the following:
// Can we change i from i32 to i64 to eliminate the cast inside the loop?
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) A[i] *= 0.1;
// Can we assume that this loop will eventually terminate?
for (int i = 0; i <= n; ++i) A[i] *= 0.1;
In its current form, it isn't truly sufficient for either.
In the first case, if the increment overflows, it'll still have some
valid i32 value; sign-extending it will produce a value which is 33
homogeneous sign bits trailed by 31 independent undef bits. If i is
promoted to i64, it won't have those same values when it reaches that
point. (The compiler could recover here by reasoning about how i is
used by the load, but that's a lot more complicated and isn't always
possible.)
In the second case, there is no value for i which will be greater than
n, so having the increment return undef on overflow doesn't help.
Trap values are a formalization of some existing concepts that we have
about LLVM IR, and give the optimizers a better basis for answering yes
to both questions above.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
arguments are handled with a new InlineFunctionInfo class. This
makes it easier to extend InlineFunction to return more info in the
future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
define void @f3(void (i8*)* %__f) ssp {
entry:
call void %__f(i8* undef)
unreachable
}
define void @f4(i8* %this) ssp align 2 {
entry:
call void @f3(void (i8*)* @f2) ssp
ret void
}
The inliner is turning the indirect call to %__f into a direct
call to F2. Make the call graph more precise when this happens.
The inliner doesn't revisit call sites introduced by inlining,
so there isn't an easy way to test for this, but a more precise
callgraph is a good thing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix RefreshCallGraph to use CGN->replaceCallEdge instead of hand
rolling its own loop. replaceCallEdge properly maintains the
reference counts of the nodes, fixing a crash exposed by the
iterative callgraph stuff.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102120 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
FunctionLoweringInfo, as it isn't SelectionDAG-specific. This isn't
completely natural, as PHI node state is not per-function but rather
per-basic-block, however there's currently no other convenient
per-basic-block state to group it with.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102109 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8