This removes a hardcoded list of instructions in the CodeEmitter. Eventually I intend to remove the predicates on the affected instructions since in any given mode two of them are valid if we supported addr32/addr16 prefixes in the assembler.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224809 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When combining consecutive loads+inserts into a single vector load,
we should keep the alignment of the base load. Doing otherwise can, and does,
lead to using overly aligned instructions. In the included test case, for
example, using a 32-byte vmovaps on a 16-byte aligned value. Oops.
rdar://19190968
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously I tried to plug musttail into the existing vararg lowering
code. That turned out to be a mistake, because non-vararg calls use
significantly different register lowering, even on x86. For example, AVX
vectors are usually passed in registers to normal functions and memory
to vararg functions. Now musttail uses a completely separate lowering.
Hopefully this can be used as the basis for non-x86 perfect forwarding.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6156
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, when ctpop is supported for scalar types, the expansion of
@llvm.ctpop.vXiY uses vector element extractions, insertions and individual
calls to @llvm.ctpop.iY. When not, expansion with bit-math operations is used
for the scalar calls.
Local haswell measurements show that we can improve vector @llvm.ctpop.vXiY
expansion in some cases by using a using a vector parallel bit twiddling
approach, based on:
v = v - ((v >> 1) & 0x55555555);
v = (v & 0x33333333) + ((v >> 2) & 0x33333333);
v = ((v + (v >> 4) & 0xF0F0F0F)
v = v + (v >> 8)
v = v + (v >> 16)
v = v & 0x0000003F
(from http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#CountBitsSetParallel)
When scalar ctpop isn't supported, the approach above performs better for
v2i64, v4i32, v4i64 and v8i32 (see numbers below). And even when scalar ctpop
is supported, this approach performs ~2x better for v8i32.
Here, x86_64 implies -march=corei7-avx without ctpop and x86_64h includes ctpop
support with -march=core-avx2.
== [x86_64h - new]
v8i32: 0.661685
v4i32: 0.514678
v4i64: 0.652009
v2i64: 0.324289
== [x86_64h - old]
v8i32: 1.29578
v4i32: 0.528807
v4i64: 0.65981
v2i64: 0.330707
== [x86_64 - new]
v8i32: 1.003
v4i32: 0.656273
v4i64: 1.11711
v2i64: 0.754064
== [x86_64 - old]
v8i32: 2.34886
v4i32: 1.72053
v4i64: 1.41086
v2i64: 1.0244
More work for other vector types will come next.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is intended to be used for a family of personality functions that
have similar IR preparation requirements. Typically when interoperating
with MSVC personality functions, bits of functionality need to be
outlined from the main function into helper functions. There is also
usually more than one landing pad per invoke, which does not match the
LLVM IR landingpad representation.
None of this is implemented yet. This change just adds a new enum that
is active for *-windows-msvc and delegates to the EH removal preparation
pass. No functionality change for other targets.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224625 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Added RegOp2MemOpTable4 to transform 4th operand from register to memory in merge-masked versions of instructions.
Added lowering tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224516 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Near as I can tell prefixes are ignored on these instructions except for a comment in the Intel docs about 0xf3. Binutils disassembler seems to ignore prefixes on these instructions. Our disassembler still doesn't distinguish PS and "no prefix" well enough for this to make a functional change, but it helps with experiments I'm doing on a potential new disassembler table builder.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224496 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This handles the case of a BUILD_VECTOR being constructed out of elements extracted from a vector twice the size of the result vector. Previously this was always scalarized. Now, we try to construct a shuffle node that feeds on extract_subvectors.
This fixes PR15872 and provides a partial fix for PR21711.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6678
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The type promotion helper does not support vector type, so when make
such it does not kick in in such cases.
Original commit message:
[CodeGenPrepare] Move sign/zero extensions near loads using type promotion.
This patch extends the optimization in CodeGenPrepare that moves a sign/zero
extension near a load when the target can combine them. The optimization may
promote any operations between the extension and the load to make that possible.
Although this optimization may be beneficial for all targets, in particular
AArch64, this is enabled for X86 only as I have not benchmarked it for other
targets yet.
** Context **
Most targets feature extended loads, i.e., loads that perform a zero or sign
extension for free. In that context it is interesting to expose such pattern in
CodeGenPrepare so that the instruction selection pass can form such loads.
Sometimes, this pattern is blocked because of instructions between the load and
the extension. When those instructions are promotable to the extended type, we
can expose this pattern.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(i8* %addr1, i32* %addr2, i8 %a, i32 %b) {
%ld = load i8* %addr1
%zextld = zext i8 %ld to i32
%ld2 = load i32* %addr2
%add = add nsw i32 %ld2, %zextld
%sextadd = sext i32 %add to i64
%zexta = zext i8 %a to i32
%addza = add nsw i32 %zexta, %zextld
%sextaddza = sext i32 %addza to i64
%addb = add nsw i32 %b, %zextld
%sextaddb = sext i32 %addb to i64
call void @dummy(i64 %sextadd, i64 %sextaddza, i64 %sextaddb)
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on x86_64:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movl (%rsi), %es # plain load
addl %eax, %esi # 32-bit add
movslq %esi, %rdi # sign extend the result of add
movzbl %dl, %edx # zero extend the first argument
addl %eax, %edx # 32-bit add
movslq %edx, %rsi # sign extend the result of add
addl %eax, %ecx # 32-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the result of add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 7.45 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
Now, by promoting the additions to form more extended loads we would generate:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movslq (%rsi), %rdi # sign-extended load
addq %rax, %rdi # 64-bit add
movzbl %dl, %esi # zero extend the first argument
addq %rax, %rsi # 64-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the second argument
addq %rax, %rdx # 64-bit add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 6.15 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
This kind of sequences happen a lot on code using 32-bit indexes on 64-bit
architectures.
Note: The throughput numbers are similar on Sandy Bridge and Haswell.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid the penalty of all these sign/zero extensions, we merge them in the
loads at the beginning of the chain of computation by promoting all the chain of
computation on the extended type. The promotion is done if and only if we do not
introduce new extensions, i.e., if we do not degrade the code quality.
To achieve this, we extend the existing “move ext to load” optimization with the
promotion mechanism introduced to match larger patterns for addressing mode
(r200947).
The idea of this extension is to perform the following transformation:
ext(promotableInst1(...(promotableInstN(load))))
=>
promotedInst1(...(promotedInstN(ext(load))))
The promotion mechanism in that optimization is enabled by a new TargetLowering
switch, which is off by default. In other words, by default, the optimization
performs the “move ext to load” optimization as it was before this patch.
** Performance **
Configuration: x86_64: Ivy Bridge fixed at 2900MHz running OS X 10.10.
Tested Optimization Levels: O3/Os
Tests: llvm-testsuite + externals.
Results:
- No regression beside noise.
- Improvements:
CINT2006/473.astar: ~2%
Benchmarks/PAQ8p: ~2%
Misc/perlin: ~3%
The results are consistent for both O3 and Os.
<rdar://problem/18310086>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: As a side-quest for D6629 jvoung pointed out that I should use -verify-machineinstrs and this found a bug in x86-32's handling of EFLAGS for PUSHF/POPF. This patch fixes the use/def, and adds -verify-machineinstrs to all x86 tests which contain 'EFLAGS'. One exception: this patch leaves inline-asm-fpstack.ll as-is because it fails -verify-machineinstrs in a way unrelated to EFLAGS. This patch also modifies cmpxchg-clobber-flags.ll along the lines of what D6629 already does by also testing i386.
Test Plan: ninja check
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jvoung
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6687
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch extends the optimization in CodeGenPrepare that moves a sign/zero
extension near a load when the target can combine them. The optimization may
promote any operations between the extension and the load to make that possible.
Although this optimization may be beneficial for all targets, in particular
AArch64, this is enabled for X86 only as I have not benchmarked it for other
targets yet.
** Context **
Most targets feature extended loads, i.e., loads that perform a zero or sign
extension for free. In that context it is interesting to expose such pattern in
CodeGenPrepare so that the instruction selection pass can form such loads.
Sometimes, this pattern is blocked because of instructions between the load and
the extension. When those instructions are promotable to the extended type, we
can expose this pattern.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(i8* %addr1, i32* %addr2, i8 %a, i32 %b) {
%ld = load i8* %addr1
%zextld = zext i8 %ld to i32
%ld2 = load i32* %addr2
%add = add nsw i32 %ld2, %zextld
%sextadd = sext i32 %add to i64
%zexta = zext i8 %a to i32
%addza = add nsw i32 %zexta, %zextld
%sextaddza = sext i32 %addza to i64
%addb = add nsw i32 %b, %zextld
%sextaddb = sext i32 %addb to i64
call void @dummy(i64 %sextadd, i64 %sextaddza, i64 %sextaddb)
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on x86_64:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movl (%rsi), %es # plain load
addl %eax, %esi # 32-bit add
movslq %esi, %rdi # sign extend the result of add
movzbl %dl, %edx # zero extend the first argument
addl %eax, %edx # 32-bit add
movslq %edx, %rsi # sign extend the result of add
addl %eax, %ecx # 32-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the result of add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 7.45 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
Now, by promoting the additions to form more extended loads we would generate:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movslq (%rsi), %rdi # sign-extended load
addq %rax, %rdi # 64-bit add
movzbl %dl, %esi # zero extend the first argument
addq %rax, %rsi # 64-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the second argument
addq %rax, %rdx # 64-bit add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 6.15 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
This kind of sequences happen a lot on code using 32-bit indexes on 64-bit
architectures.
Note: The throughput numbers are similar on Sandy Bridge and Haswell.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid the penalty of all these sign/zero extensions, we merge them in the
loads at the beginning of the chain of computation by promoting all the chain of
computation on the extended type. The promotion is done if and only if we do not
introduce new extensions, i.e., if we do not degrade the code quality.
To achieve this, we extend the existing “move ext to load” optimization with the
promotion mechanism introduced to match larger patterns for addressing mode
(r200947).
The idea of this extension is to perform the following transformation:
ext(promotableInst1(...(promotableInstN(load))))
=>
promotedInst1(...(promotedInstN(ext(load))))
The promotion mechanism in that optimization is enabled by a new TargetLowering
switch, which is off by default. In other words, by default, the optimization
performs the “move ext to load” optimization as it was before this patch.
** Performance **
Configuration: x86_64: Ivy Bridge fixed at 2900MHz running OS X 10.10.
Tested Optimization Levels: O3/Os
Tests: llvm-testsuite + externals.
Results:
- No regression beside noise.
- Improvements:
CINT2006/473.astar: ~2%
Benchmarks/PAQ8p: ~2%
Misc/perlin: ~3%
The results are consistent for both O3 and Os.
<rdar://problem/18310086>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a fix for PR21709 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21709 ).
When we have 2 consecutive 16-byte loads that are merged into one 32-byte vector,
we can use a single 32-byte load instead.
But we don't do this for SandyBridge / IvyBridge because they have slower 32-byte memops.
We also don't bother using 32-byte *integer* loads on a machine that only has AVX1 (btver2)
because those operands would have to be split in half anyway since there is no support for
32-byte integer math ops.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6492
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224344 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
According to AVX specification:
"Most arithmetic and data processing instructions encoded using the VEX prefix and
performing memory accesses have more flexible memory alignment requirements
than instructions that are encoded without the VEX prefix. Specifically,
With the exception of explicitly aligned 16 or 32 byte SIMD load/store instructions,
most VEX-encoded, arithmetic and data processing instructions operate in
a flexible environment regarding memory address alignment, i.e. VEX-encoded
instruction with 32-byte or 16-byte load semantics will support unaligned load
operation by default. Memory arguments for most instructions with VEX prefix
operate normally without causing #GP(0) on any byte-granularity alignment
(unlike Legacy SSE instructions)."
The same for AVX-512.
This change does not affect anything right now, because only the "memop pattern fragment"
depends on FeatureVectorUAMem and it is not used in AVX patterns.
All AVX patterns are based on the "unaligned load" anyway.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224330 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact.
Test Plan: ninja check
Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adds the various "rm" instruction variants into the list of instructions that have a partial register update. Also adds all variants of SQRTSD that were missing in the original list.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6620
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224246 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously print+verify passes were added in a very unsystematic way, which is
annoying when debugging as you miss intermediate steps and allows bugs to stay
unnotice when no verification is performed.
To make this change practical I added the possibility to explicitely disable
verification. I used this option on all places where no verification was
performed previously (because alot of places actually don't pass the
MachineVerifier).
In the long term these problems should be fixed properly and verification
enabled after each pass. I'll enable some more verification in subsequent
commits.
This is the 2nd attempt at this after realizing that PassManager::add() may
actually delete the pass.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224059 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously print+verify passes were added in a very unsystematic way, which is
annoying when debugging as you miss intermediate steps and allows bugs to stay
unnotice when no verification is performed.
To make this change practical I added the possibility to explicitely disable
verification. I used this option on all places where no verification was
performed previously (because alot of places actually don't pass the
MachineVerifier).
In the long term these problems should be fixed properly and verification
enabled after each pass. I'll enable some more verification in subsequent
commits.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224042 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
