For stack frames requiring realignment, three pointers may be needed:
- ebp to address incoming arguments
- esi (could be any callee-saved register) to address locals
- esp to address outgoing arguments
We would use esi unconditionally without verifying that it did not
conflict with inline assembly.
This change doesn't do the verification, it simply emits a fatal error
on functions that use stack realignment, dynamic SP adjustments, and
inline assembly.
Because stack realignment is common on Windows, we also no longer assume
that MS inline assembly clobbers esp. Instead, we analyze the inline
instructions for implicit definitions and check if esp is there. If so,
we require the use of a base pointer and consider it in the condition
above.
Mostly fixes PR16830, but we could try harder to find a non-conflicting
base pointer.
Reviewers: sunfish
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1317
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MCJIT needs to be able to run in hostile environments, even when PWD
is invalid. There's no need to crash MCJIT in this case.
The obvious fix is to simply leave MCContext's CompilationDir empty
when PWD can't be determined. This way, MCJIT clients,
and other clients that link with LLVM don’t need a valid working directory.
If we do want to guarantee valid CompilationDir, that should be done
only for clients of getCompilationDir(). This is as simple as checking
for an empty string.
The only current use of getCompilationDir is EmitGenDwarfInfo, which
won’t conceivably run with an invalid working dir. However, in the
purely hypothetically and untestable case that this happens, the
AT_comp_dir will be omitted from the compilation_unit DIE.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196874 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Similar to gcov, llvm-cov will now print out the block count at the end
of each block. Multiple blocks can end on the same line.
One computational difference is by using -a, llvm-cov will no longer
simply add the block counts together to form a line count. Instead, it
will take the maximum of the block counts on that line. This has a
similar effect to what gcov does, but generates more correct counts in
certain scenarios.
Also updated tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196856 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This avoids creating branch weight metadata of length one when we fold
cases into the default of a switch instruction, which was triggering
an assert.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196845 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch by Jiangning Liu.
With some test case changes:
- intrinsic test added to the existing /test/CodeGen/AArch64/neon-aba-abd.ll.
- New test cases to cover movi 1D scenario without using the intrinsic in
test/CodeGen/AArch64/neon-mov.ll.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196806 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
When clang is used under GNU/Linux in a chroot without /proc mount, it falls
back on the BSD method. However, since the buf variable is used twice
and fails with snprintf to produce the correct path.
When called as relatived (ie ./clang), it was failing with:
"" -cc1 [...] -x c++ x.cc
error: unable to execute command: Executable "" doesn't exist!
I also took the opportunity to simply the code (the first arg of test_dir
was useless).
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2361
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196791 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The MSA ld.[bhwd] and st.[bhwd] instructions scale the immediate by the
element size before use as an offset. The offset must therefore be a
multiple of the element size to be valid in these instructions. However,
an unaligned base address is valid in MSA.
This commit causes the compiler to emit valid code when the calculated
offset is not a multiple of the element size by accounting for the offset
using addiu and using a zero offset in the load/store.
Depends on D2338
Reviewers: matheusalmeida
Reviewed By: matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2339
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As we can't make a complete solution now it has been decided to enable .set directive to handle long jump expressions. This will cause parser to report errors when parsing integer based register assignments, for example:
.set r3, will be reported as error. Still, the need for expressions is higher priority as the integer based register assignments are Mips specific and can be avoided using register names.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196773 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When trying to eliminate an "sub sp, sp, #N" instruction by folding
it into an existing push/pop using dummy registers, we need to account
for the fact that this might affect precisely how "fp" gets set in the
prologue.
We were attempting this, but assuming that *whenever* we performed a
fold it would make a difference. This is false, for example, in:
push {r4, r7, lr}
add fp, sp, #4
vpush {d8}
sub sp, sp, #8
we can fold the "sub" into the "vpush", forming "vpush {d7, d8}".
However, in that case the "add fp" instruction mustn't change, which
we were getting wrong before.
Should fix PR18160.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes PR17872. This bug can lead to C++ destructors not being
called when they should be, when an exception is thrown.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196711 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before this change, inlining one "invoke" into an outer "invoke" call
site can lead to the outer landingpad's catch/filter clauses being
copied multiple times into the resulting landingpad. This happens:
* when the inlined function contains multiple "resume" instructions,
because forwardResume() copies the clauses but is called multiple
times;
* when the inlined function contains a "resume" and a "call", because
HandleCallsInBlockInlinedThroughInvoke() copies the clauses but is
redundant with forwardResume().
Fix this by deduplicating the code.
This problem doesn't lead to any incorrect execution; it's only
untidy.
This change will make fixing PR17872 a little easier.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196710 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
They were out of place since the introduction of arbitrary precision integer
types.
This also synchronizes the documentation to Types.h, so it refers to first class
types and single value types.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196661 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
