Near as I can tell prefixes are ignored on these instructions except for a comment in the Intel docs about 0xf3. Binutils disassembler seems to ignore prefixes on these instructions. Our disassembler still doesn't distinguish PS and "no prefix" well enough for this to make a functional change, but it helps with experiments I'm doing on a potential new disassembler table builder.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224496 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This handles the case of a BUILD_VECTOR being constructed out of elements extracted from a vector twice the size of the result vector. Previously this was always scalarized. Now, we try to construct a shuffle node that feeds on extract_subvectors.
This fixes PR15872 and provides a partial fix for PR21711.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6678
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The type promotion helper does not support vector type, so when make
such it does not kick in in such cases.
Original commit message:
[CodeGenPrepare] Move sign/zero extensions near loads using type promotion.
This patch extends the optimization in CodeGenPrepare that moves a sign/zero
extension near a load when the target can combine them. The optimization may
promote any operations between the extension and the load to make that possible.
Although this optimization may be beneficial for all targets, in particular
AArch64, this is enabled for X86 only as I have not benchmarked it for other
targets yet.
** Context **
Most targets feature extended loads, i.e., loads that perform a zero or sign
extension for free. In that context it is interesting to expose such pattern in
CodeGenPrepare so that the instruction selection pass can form such loads.
Sometimes, this pattern is blocked because of instructions between the load and
the extension. When those instructions are promotable to the extended type, we
can expose this pattern.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(i8* %addr1, i32* %addr2, i8 %a, i32 %b) {
%ld = load i8* %addr1
%zextld = zext i8 %ld to i32
%ld2 = load i32* %addr2
%add = add nsw i32 %ld2, %zextld
%sextadd = sext i32 %add to i64
%zexta = zext i8 %a to i32
%addza = add nsw i32 %zexta, %zextld
%sextaddza = sext i32 %addza to i64
%addb = add nsw i32 %b, %zextld
%sextaddb = sext i32 %addb to i64
call void @dummy(i64 %sextadd, i64 %sextaddza, i64 %sextaddb)
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on x86_64:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movl (%rsi), %es # plain load
addl %eax, %esi # 32-bit add
movslq %esi, %rdi # sign extend the result of add
movzbl %dl, %edx # zero extend the first argument
addl %eax, %edx # 32-bit add
movslq %edx, %rsi # sign extend the result of add
addl %eax, %ecx # 32-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the result of add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 7.45 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
Now, by promoting the additions to form more extended loads we would generate:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movslq (%rsi), %rdi # sign-extended load
addq %rax, %rdi # 64-bit add
movzbl %dl, %esi # zero extend the first argument
addq %rax, %rsi # 64-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the second argument
addq %rax, %rdx # 64-bit add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 6.15 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
This kind of sequences happen a lot on code using 32-bit indexes on 64-bit
architectures.
Note: The throughput numbers are similar on Sandy Bridge and Haswell.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid the penalty of all these sign/zero extensions, we merge them in the
loads at the beginning of the chain of computation by promoting all the chain of
computation on the extended type. The promotion is done if and only if we do not
introduce new extensions, i.e., if we do not degrade the code quality.
To achieve this, we extend the existing “move ext to load” optimization with the
promotion mechanism introduced to match larger patterns for addressing mode
(r200947).
The idea of this extension is to perform the following transformation:
ext(promotableInst1(...(promotableInstN(load))))
=>
promotedInst1(...(promotedInstN(ext(load))))
The promotion mechanism in that optimization is enabled by a new TargetLowering
switch, which is off by default. In other words, by default, the optimization
performs the “move ext to load” optimization as it was before this patch.
** Performance **
Configuration: x86_64: Ivy Bridge fixed at 2900MHz running OS X 10.10.
Tested Optimization Levels: O3/Os
Tests: llvm-testsuite + externals.
Results:
- No regression beside noise.
- Improvements:
CINT2006/473.astar: ~2%
Benchmarks/PAQ8p: ~2%
Misc/perlin: ~3%
The results are consistent for both O3 and Os.
<rdar://problem/18310086>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: As a side-quest for D6629 jvoung pointed out that I should use -verify-machineinstrs and this found a bug in x86-32's handling of EFLAGS for PUSHF/POPF. This patch fixes the use/def, and adds -verify-machineinstrs to all x86 tests which contain 'EFLAGS'. One exception: this patch leaves inline-asm-fpstack.ll as-is because it fails -verify-machineinstrs in a way unrelated to EFLAGS. This patch also modifies cmpxchg-clobber-flags.ll along the lines of what D6629 already does by also testing i386.
Test Plan: ninja check
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jvoung
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6687
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch extends the optimization in CodeGenPrepare that moves a sign/zero
extension near a load when the target can combine them. The optimization may
promote any operations between the extension and the load to make that possible.
Although this optimization may be beneficial for all targets, in particular
AArch64, this is enabled for X86 only as I have not benchmarked it for other
targets yet.
** Context **
Most targets feature extended loads, i.e., loads that perform a zero or sign
extension for free. In that context it is interesting to expose such pattern in
CodeGenPrepare so that the instruction selection pass can form such loads.
Sometimes, this pattern is blocked because of instructions between the load and
the extension. When those instructions are promotable to the extended type, we
can expose this pattern.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(i8* %addr1, i32* %addr2, i8 %a, i32 %b) {
%ld = load i8* %addr1
%zextld = zext i8 %ld to i32
%ld2 = load i32* %addr2
%add = add nsw i32 %ld2, %zextld
%sextadd = sext i32 %add to i64
%zexta = zext i8 %a to i32
%addza = add nsw i32 %zexta, %zextld
%sextaddza = sext i32 %addza to i64
%addb = add nsw i32 %b, %zextld
%sextaddb = sext i32 %addb to i64
call void @dummy(i64 %sextadd, i64 %sextaddza, i64 %sextaddb)
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on x86_64:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movl (%rsi), %es # plain load
addl %eax, %esi # 32-bit add
movslq %esi, %rdi # sign extend the result of add
movzbl %dl, %edx # zero extend the first argument
addl %eax, %edx # 32-bit add
movslq %edx, %rsi # sign extend the result of add
addl %eax, %ecx # 32-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the result of add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 7.45 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
Now, by promoting the additions to form more extended loads we would generate:
[...]
movzbl (%rdi), %eax # zero-extended load
movslq (%rsi), %rdi # sign-extended load
addq %rax, %rdi # 64-bit add
movzbl %dl, %esi # zero extend the first argument
addq %rax, %rsi # 64-bit add
movslq %ecx, %rdx # sign extend the second argument
addq %rax, %rdx # 64-bit add
[...]
The throughput of this sequence is 6.15 cycles on Ivy Bridge according to IACA.
This kind of sequences happen a lot on code using 32-bit indexes on 64-bit
architectures.
Note: The throughput numbers are similar on Sandy Bridge and Haswell.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid the penalty of all these sign/zero extensions, we merge them in the
loads at the beginning of the chain of computation by promoting all the chain of
computation on the extended type. The promotion is done if and only if we do not
introduce new extensions, i.e., if we do not degrade the code quality.
To achieve this, we extend the existing “move ext to load” optimization with the
promotion mechanism introduced to match larger patterns for addressing mode
(r200947).
The idea of this extension is to perform the following transformation:
ext(promotableInst1(...(promotableInstN(load))))
=>
promotedInst1(...(promotedInstN(ext(load))))
The promotion mechanism in that optimization is enabled by a new TargetLowering
switch, which is off by default. In other words, by default, the optimization
performs the “move ext to load” optimization as it was before this patch.
** Performance **
Configuration: x86_64: Ivy Bridge fixed at 2900MHz running OS X 10.10.
Tested Optimization Levels: O3/Os
Tests: llvm-testsuite + externals.
Results:
- No regression beside noise.
- Improvements:
CINT2006/473.astar: ~2%
Benchmarks/PAQ8p: ~2%
Misc/perlin: ~3%
The results are consistent for both O3 and Os.
<rdar://problem/18310086>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a fix for PR21709 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21709 ).
When we have 2 consecutive 16-byte loads that are merged into one 32-byte vector,
we can use a single 32-byte load instead.
But we don't do this for SandyBridge / IvyBridge because they have slower 32-byte memops.
We also don't bother using 32-byte *integer* loads on a machine that only has AVX1 (btver2)
because those operands would have to be split in half anyway since there is no support for
32-byte integer math ops.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6492
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224344 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
According to AVX specification:
"Most arithmetic and data processing instructions encoded using the VEX prefix and
performing memory accesses have more flexible memory alignment requirements
than instructions that are encoded without the VEX prefix. Specifically,
With the exception of explicitly aligned 16 or 32 byte SIMD load/store instructions,
most VEX-encoded, arithmetic and data processing instructions operate in
a flexible environment regarding memory address alignment, i.e. VEX-encoded
instruction with 32-byte or 16-byte load semantics will support unaligned load
operation by default. Memory arguments for most instructions with VEX prefix
operate normally without causing #GP(0) on any byte-granularity alignment
(unlike Legacy SSE instructions)."
The same for AVX-512.
This change does not affect anything right now, because only the "memop pattern fragment"
depends on FeatureVectorUAMem and it is not used in AVX patterns.
All AVX patterns are based on the "unaligned load" anyway.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224330 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact.
Test Plan: ninja check
Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adds the various "rm" instruction variants into the list of instructions that have a partial register update. Also adds all variants of SQRTSD that were missing in the original list.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6620
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224246 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously print+verify passes were added in a very unsystematic way, which is
annoying when debugging as you miss intermediate steps and allows bugs to stay
unnotice when no verification is performed.
To make this change practical I added the possibility to explicitely disable
verification. I used this option on all places where no verification was
performed previously (because alot of places actually don't pass the
MachineVerifier).
In the long term these problems should be fixed properly and verification
enabled after each pass. I'll enable some more verification in subsequent
commits.
This is the 2nd attempt at this after realizing that PassManager::add() may
actually delete the pass.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224059 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously print+verify passes were added in a very unsystematic way, which is
annoying when debugging as you miss intermediate steps and allows bugs to stay
unnotice when no verification is performed.
To make this change practical I added the possibility to explicitely disable
verification. I used this option on all places where no verification was
performed previously (because alot of places actually don't pass the
MachineVerifier).
In the long term these problems should be fixed properly and verification
enabled after each pass. I'll enable some more verification in subsequent
commits.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224042 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can't reach those from zext, but other parts of the backend (the shuffle
lowering) generate 256-bit VZEXT nodes.
Fixes PR21876.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223996 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
EltsFromConsecutiveLoads was apparently only ever called for 128-bit vectors, and assumed this implicitly. r223518 started calling it for AVX-sized vectors, causing the code path that had this assumption to crash.
This adds a check to make this path fire only for 128-bit vectors.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6579
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223922 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Lowering patterns were written through avx512_broadcast_pat multiclass as pattern generates VBROADCAST and COPY_TO_REGCLASS nodes.
Added lowering tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223804 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
missing barcelona CPU which that test uncovered, and remove the 32-bit
x86 CPUs which I really wasn't prepared to audit and test thoroughly.
If anyone wants to clean up the 32-bit only x86 CPUs, go for it.
Also, if anyone else wants to try to de-duplicate the AMD CPUs, that'd
be cool, but from the looks of it wouldn't save as much as it did for
the Intel CPUs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223774 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Notably, this adds simple micro-architecture names for the Intel CPU
variants, and defines the old 'core'-based names as aliases. GCC has
started to simplify their documented interface to use these names as
well, so it seems like we can start to converge on a consistent pattern.
I'd appreciate Intel double checking the entries that aren't yet
documented widely, especially Atom (Bonnell and Silvermont), Knights
Landing, and Skylake. But this change shouldn't break any existing
users.
Also, ran clang-format to re-format this code and it actually worked
(modulo a tiny bug) so hopefully we can start to stop thinking about
formatting this stuff.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223769 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This handles the simplest case for mov -> push conversion:
1. x86-32 calling convention, everything is passed through the stack.
2. There is no reserved call frame.
3. Only registers or immediates are pushed, no attempt to combine a mem-reg-mem sequence into a single PUSHmm.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6503
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223757 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix a compact unwind encoding logic bug which would try to encode
more callee saved registers than it should, leading to early bail out
in the encoding logic and abusive use of DWARF frame mode unnecessarily.
Also remove no-compact-unwind.ll which was testing the wrong thing
based on this bug and move it to valid 'compact unwind' tests. Added
other few more tests too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223676 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Teach ISel how to match a TZCNT/LZCNT from a conditional move if the
condition code is X86_COND_NE.
Existing tablegen patterns only allowed to match TZCNT/LZCNT from a
X86cond with condition code equal to X86_COND_E. To avoid introducing
extra rules, I added an 'ImmLeaf' definition that checks if the
condition code is COND_E or COND_NE.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223668 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before this patch, the backend sub-optimally expanded the non-constant shift
count of a v8i16 shift into a sequence of two 'movd' plus 'movzwl'.
With this patch the backend checks if the target features sse4.1. If so, then
it lets the shuffle legalizer deal with the expansion of the shift amount.
Example:
;;
define <8 x i16> @test(<8 x i16> %A, <8 x i16> %B) {
%shamt = shufflevector <8 x i16> %B, <8 x i16> undef, <8 x i32> zeroinitializer
%shl = shl <8 x i16> %A, %shamt
ret <8 x i16> %shl
}
;;
Before (with -mattr=+avx):
vmovd %xmm1, %eax
movzwl %ax, %eax
vmovd %eax, %xmm1
vpsllw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
retq
Now:
vpxor %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm2
vpblendw $1, %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm1
vpsllw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
retq
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223660 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
X86ISelLowering.cpp has a long switch for intrinsics. I moved a part of
this long switch to the new intrinsics table in X86IntrinsicsInfo.h.
No functional changes, just code and compile time optimization.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223641 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix the poor codegen seen in PR21710 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21710 ).
Before we crack 32-byte build vectors into smaller chunks (and then subsequently
glue them back together), we should look for the easy case where we can just load
all elements in a single op.
An example of the codegen change is:
From:
vmovss 16(%rdi), %xmm1
vmovups (%rdi), %xmm0
vinsertps $16, 20(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vinsertps $32, 24(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vinsertps $48, 28(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
retq
To:
vmovups (%rdi), %ymm0
retq
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6536
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223518 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
