Always use an exit code of 1, but print the help message if useful.
Remove the exception handling tag in llvm-as, llvm-dis and
llvm-bcanalyzer, where it isn't used.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instructions in a block. GetUnderlyingObject is more expensive than it looks as
it can, for instance, call SimplifyInstruction.
This might have some behavioural changes in odd corner cases, but only because
of some strange artefacts of the original implementation. If you were relying
on those, we can fix that by replacing this with a smarter algorithm. Change
passes the existing tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166754 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As discussed on IRC, add VectorTargetTransform::getNumberOfParts
to provide a stable interface to the vector legalization splitting factor.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166751 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to hack around this in the gold plugin by deleting a module if no symbol was
needed. Unfortunately, the hack is wrong in the case of o module having no
visible symbols but still having side effects via static constructors.
The bug will have to be fixed in libLTO itself.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is needed so that perl's SHA can be compiled (otherwise
BBVectorize takes far too long to find its fixed point).
I'll try to come up with a reduced test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166738 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
include/llvm/MC/MCTargetAsmParser.h:46:8: error: 'llvm::ParseInstructionInfo' has a field 'llvm::ParseInstructionInfo::AsmRewrites' whose type uses the anonymous namespace [-Werror]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166729 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the first of several steps to incorporate information from the new
TargetTransformInfo infrastructure into BBVectorize. Two things are done here:
1. Target information is used to determine if it is profitable to fuse two
instructions. This means that the cost of the vector operation must not
be more expensive than the cost of the two original operations. Pairs that
are not profitable are no longer considered (because current cost information
is incomplete, for intrinsics for example, equal-cost pairs are still
considered).
2. The 'cost savings' computed for the profitability check are also used to
rank the DAGs that represent the potential vectorization plans. Specifically,
for nodes of non-trivial depth, the cost savings is used as the node
weight.
The next step will be to incorporate the shuffle costs into the DAG weighting;
this will give the edges of the DAG weights as well. Once that is done, when
target information is available, we should be able to dispense with the
depth heuristic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166716 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Most places can use PrintFatalError as the unwinding mechanism was not
used for anything other than printing the error. The single exception
was CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp, where intermediate errors during type
resolution were ignored to simplify incremental platform development.
This use is replaced by an error flag in TreePattern and bailout earlier
in various places if it is set.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166712 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The isValueEqualityComparison() guard at the top of SimplifySwitch()
only applies to some of the possible transformations.
The newer transformations work just fine on large switches, and the
check on predecessor count is nonsensical.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166710 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Relationship maps are represented as InstrMapping records which are parsed by
TableGen and the information is used to construct mapping tables to represent
appropriate relations between instructions. These tables are emitted into
XXXGenInstrInfo.inc file along with the functions to query them.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma <jverma@codeaurora.org>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and also fixes the R_PPC64_TOC16 and R_PPC64_TOC16_DS relocation offset.
The 'nop' is needed so a restore TOC instruction (ld r2,40(r1)) can be placed
by the linker to correct restore the TOC of previous function.
Current code has two issues: it defines in PPCInstr64Bit.td file a LDinto_toc
and LDtoc_restore as a DSForm_1 with DS_RA=0 where it should be
DS=2 (the 8 bytes displacement of the TOC saving). It also wrongly emits a
MC intruction using an uint32_t value while the PPC::BL8_NOP_ELF
and PPC::BLA8_NOP_ELF are both uint64_t (because of the following 'nop').
This patch corrects the remaining ExecutionEngine using MCJIT:
ExecutionEngine/2002-12-16-ArgTest.ll
ExecutionEngine/2003-05-07-ArgumentTest.ll
ExecutionEngine/2005-12-02-TailCallBug.ll
ExecutionEngine/hello.ll
ExecutionEngine/hello2.ll
ExecutionEngine/test-call.ll
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166682 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
structs having size 3, 5, 6, or 7. Such a struct must be passed and received
as right-justified within its register or memory slot. The problem is only
present for structs that are passed in registers.
Previously, as part of a patch handling all structs of size less than 8, I
added logic to rotate the incoming register so that the struct was left-
justified prior to storing the whole register. This was incorrect because
the address of the parameter had already been adjusted earlier to point to
the right-adjusted value in the storage slot. Essentially I had accidentally
accounted for the right-adjustment twice.
In this patch, I removed the incorrect logic and reorganized the code to make
the flow clearer.
The removal of the rotates changes the expected code generation, so test case
structsinregs.ll has been modified to reflect this. I also added a new test
case, jaggedstructs.ll, to demonstrate that structs of these sizes can now
be properly received and passed.
I've built and tested the code on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with no new
regressions. I also ran the GCC compatibility test suite and verified that
earlier problems with these structs are now resolved, with no new regressions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166680 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds initial PPC64 TOC MC object creation using the small mcmodel
(a single 64K TOC) adding the some TOC relocations (R_PPC64_TOC,
R_PPC64_TOC16, and R_PPC64_TOC16DS).
The addition of 'undefinedExplicitRelSym' hook on 'MCELFObjectTargetWriter'
is meant to avoid the creation of an unreferenced ".TOC." symbol (used in
the .odp creation) as well to set the R_PPC64_TOC relocation target as the
temporary ".TOC." symbol. On PPC64 ABI, the R_PPC64_TOC relocation should
not point to any symbol.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
smaller integer loads and stores.
The high-level motivation is that the frontend sometimes generates
a single whole-alloca integer load or store during ABI lowering of
splittable allocas. We need to be able to break this apart in order to
see the underlying elements and properly promote them to SSA values. The
hope is that this fixes some performance regressions on x86-32 with the
new SROA pass.
Unfortunately, this causes quite a bit of churn in the test cases, and
bloats some IR that comes out. When we see an alloca that consists soley
of bits and bytes being extracted and re-inserted, we now do some
splitting first, before building widened integer "bucket of bits"
representations. These are always well folded by instcombine however, so
this shouldn't actually result in missed opportunities.
If this splitting of all-integer allocas does cause problems (perhaps
due to smaller SSA values going into the RA), we could potentially go to
some extreme measures to only do this integer splitting trick when there
are non-integer component accesses of an alloca, but discovering this is
quite expensive: it adds yet another complete walk of the recursive use
tree of the alloca.
Either way, I will be watching build bots and LNT bots to see what
fallout there is here. If anyone gets x86-32 numbers before & after this
change, I would be very interested.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
