to carry a SmallVector of flagged nodes, just calculate the flagged nodes
dynamically when they are needed.
The local-liveness change is due to a trivial scheduling change where
the scheduler arbitrary decision differently.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59273 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
special-purpose hook to a new pass. Also, add check to see if any
x87 virtual registers are used, to avoid doing any work in the
common case that no x87 code is needed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59190 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that it no longer handles non-power-of-two vectors.
However it previously only handled them sometimes,
depending on obscure numerical relationships between
the index and vector type. For example, for a vector
of length 6, it would succeed if and only if the
index was an even multiple of 6. I consider this
more confusing than useful.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59122 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
before creating the SUnit for the operation that it was unfolded from. This
allows each SUnit to have all of its predecessor SUnits available at the time
it is created. I don't know yet if this will be absolutely required, but it
is a little tidier to do it this way.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59083 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument instead of taking the SelectionDAG's TargetMachine. This is
needed for some upcoming scheduler changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59055 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The CC was changed, but wasn't checked to see if it was legal if the DAG
combiner was being run after legalization. Threw in a couple of checks just to
make sure that it's okay. As far as the PR is concerned, no back-end target
actually exhibited this problem, so there isn't an associated testcase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
support targets that support these conversions. Users should avoid using
this node as the current targets don't generating code for it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59001 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
where the argument is an apint, or smaller than the minimum
size for which there is a libcall (i32).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58994 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
inform the optimizers that the result must be zero/
sign extended from the smaller type. For example,
if a fp to unsigned i16 is promoted to fp to i32,
then we are allowed to assume that the extra 16 bits
are zero (because the result of fp to i16 is undefined
if the result does not fit in an i16). This is
quite aggressive, but should help the optimizers
produce better code. This requires correcting a
test which thought that fp_to_uint is some kind
of truncation, which it is not: in the testcase
(which does fp to i1), either the fp value converts
to 0 or 1 or the result is undefined, which is
quite different to truncation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58991 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
an array that is empty. Instead of requiring this array, allow a null pointer.
This shrinks all forward references of structs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58959 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
FIXME: it seems, that most of targets don't support
offsets wrt CPI/GlobalAddress', was it intentional?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is Chris' patch from the PR, modified to realize that
SETUGT/SETULT occur legitimately with integers, plus
two fixes in LegalizeDAG to pass a valid result type into
LegalizeSetCC. The argument of TLI.getSetCCResultType is
ignored on PPC, but I think I'm following usage elsewhere.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58871 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the condition for a BRCOND, according to what is
returned by getSetCCResultContents. Since all
targets return the same thing (ZeroOrOneSetCCResult),
this should be harmless! The point is that all over
the place the result of SETCC is fed directly into
BRCOND. On machines for which getSetCCResultContents
returns ZeroOrNegativeOneSetCCResult, this is a
sign-extended boolean. So it seems dangerous to
also feed BRCOND zero-extended booleans in some
circumstances - for example, when promoting the
condition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58861 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(e.g. a bitfield test) narrow the load as much as possible.
The has the potential to avoid unnecessary partial-word
load-after-store conflicts, which cause stalls on several targets.
Also a size win on x86 (testb vs testl).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58825 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LLVM IR code and not in the selection DAG ISel. This is a cleaner solution.
- Fix the heuristic for determining if protectors are necessary. The previous
one wasn't checking the proper type size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58824 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
