When matching a compare with a subtract where the arguments of the compare are
swapped w.r.t. the arguments of the subtract, we need to negate the predicates
(or CR bit indices) of the users. This, however, is not the same as inverting
the predicate (negating LT -> GT, but inverting LT -> GE, for example). The ARM
backend seems to do this correctly, but when I adapted the code for the PPC
backend, I introduced an error in this logic.
Comparison optimization is now enabled again by default.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This seems to cause a stage-2 LLVM compile failure (by crashing TableGen); do
I'm disabling this for now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Many PPC instructions have a so-called 'record form' which stores to a specific
condition register the result of comparing the result of the instruction with
zero (always as a signed comparison). For integer operations on PPC64, this is
always a 64-bit comparison.
This implementation is derived from the implementation in the ARM backend;
there are some differences because PPC condition registers are allocatable
virtual registers (although the record forms always use a specific one), and we
look for a matching subtraction instruction after the compare (but before the
first use) in addition to before it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179802 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes an ABI bug for non-Darwin PPC64. For the callee-saved condition
registers, the spill location is specified relative to the stack pointer (SP +
8). However, this is not relative to the SP after the new stack frame is
established, but instead relative to the caller's stack pointer (it is stored
into the linkage area of the parent's stack frame).
So, like with the link register, we don't directly spill the CRs with other
callee-saved registers, but just mark them to be spilled during prologue
generation.
In practice, this reverts r179457 for PPC64 (but leaves it in place for PPC32).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179500 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For functions that need to spill CRs, and have dynamic stack allocations, the
value of the SP during the restore is not what it was during the save, and so
we need to use the FP in these cases (as for all of the other spills and
restores, but the CR restore has a special code path because its reserved slot,
like the link register, is specified directly relative to the adjusted SP).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179457 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the simple and triangle if-conversion cases, when CopyAndPredicateBlock is
used because the to-be-predicated block has other predecessors, we need to
explicitly remove the old copied block from the successors list. Normally if
conversion relies on TII->AnalyzeBranch combined with BB->CorrectExtraCFGEdges
to cleanup the successors list, but if the predicated block contained an
un-analyzable branch (such as a now-predicated return), then this will fail.
These extra successors were causing a problem on PPC because it was causing
later passes (such as PPCEarlyReturm) to leave dead return-only basic blocks in
the code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179227 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This enables us to form predicated branches (which are the same conditional
branches we had before) and also a larger set of predicated returns (including
instructions like bdnzlr which is a conditional return and loop-counter
decrement all in one).
At the moment, if conversion does not capture all possible opportunities. A
simple example is provided in early-ret2.ll, where if conversion forms one
predicated return, and then the PPCEarlyReturn pass picks up the other one. So,
at least for now, we'll keep both mechanisms.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On PowerPC, non-vector loads and stores have r+i forms; however, in functions
with large stack frames these were not being used to access slots far from the
stack pointer because such slots were out of range for the signed 16-bit
immediate offset field. This increases register pressure because we need a
separate register for each offset (when the r+r form is used). By enabling
virtual base registers, we can deal with large stack frames without unduly
increasing register pressure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
PowerPC has a conditional branch to the link register (return) instruction: BCLR.
This should be used any time when we'd otherwise have a conditional branch to a
return. This adds a small pass, PPCEarlyReturn, which runs just prior to the
branch selection pass (and, importantly, after block placement) to generate
these conditional returns when possible. It will also eliminate unconditional
branches to returns (these happen rarely; most of the time these have already
been tail duplicated by the time PPCEarlyReturn is invoked). This is a nice
optimization for small functions that do not maintain a stack frame.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179026 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
First, we should not cheat: fsel-based lowering of select_cc is a
finite-math-only optimization (the ISA manual, section F.3 of v2.06, makes
this clear, as does a note in our own README).
This also adds fsel-based lowering of EQ and NE condition codes. As it turned
out, fsel generation was covered by a grand total of zero regression test
cases. I've added some test cases to cover the existing behavior (which is now
finite-math only), as well as the new EQ cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179000 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are certain PPC instructions into which we can fold a zero immediate
operand. We can detect such cases by looking at the register class required
by the using operand (so long as it is not otherwise constrained).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On cores for which we know the misprediction penalty, and we have
the isel instruction, we can profitably perform early if conversion.
This enables us to replace some small branch sequences with selects
and avoid the potential stalls from mispredicting the branches.
Enabling this feature required implementing canInsertSelect and
insertSelect in PPCInstrInfo; isel code in PPCISelLowering was
refactored to use these functions as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178926 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The DAGCombine logic that recognized a/sqrt(b) and transformed it into
a multiplication by the reciprocal sqrt did not handle cases where the
sqrt and the division were separated by an fpext or fptrunc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For this we need to use a libcall. Previously LLVM didn't implement
libcall support for frem, so I've added it in the usual
straightforward manner. A test case from the bug report is included.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178639 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When unsafe FP math operations are enabled, we can use the fre[s] and
frsqrte[s] instructions, which generate reciprocal (sqrt) estimates, together
with some Newton iteration, in order to quickly generate floating-point
division and sqrt results. All of these instructions are separately optional,
and so each has its own feature flag (except for the Altivec instructions,
which are covered under the existing Altivec flag). Doing this is not only
faster than using the IEEE-compliant fdiv/fsqrt instructions, but allows these
computations to be pipelined with other computations in order to hide their
overall latency.
I've also added a couple of missing fnmsub patterns which turned out to be
missing (but are necessary for good code generation of the Newton iterations).
Altivec needs a similar fix, but that will probably be more complicated because
fneg is expanded for Altivec's v4f32.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178617 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When doing a partword atomic operation, a lwarx was being paired with
a stdcx. instead of a stwcx. when compiling for a 64-bit target. The
target has nothing to do with it in this case; we always need a stwcx.
Thanks to Kai Nacke for reporting the problem.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The P7 and A2 have additional floating-point conversion instructions which
allow a direct two-instruction sequence (plus load/store) to convert from all
combinations (signed/unsigned i32/i64) <--> (float/double) (on previous cores,
only some combinations were directly available).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178480 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The popcntw instruction is available whenever the popcntd instruction is
available, and performs a separate popcnt on the lower and upper 32-bits.
Ignoring the high-order count, this can be used for the 32-bit input case
(saving on the explicit zero extension otherwise required to use popcntd).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178470 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This instruction is available on modern PPC64 CPUs, and is now used
to improve the SINT_TO_FP lowering (by eliminating the need for the
separate sign extension instruction and decreasing the amount of
needed stack space).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178446 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The existing SINT_TO_FP code for i32 -> float/double conversion was disabled
because it relied on broken EXTSW_32/STD_32 instruction definitions. The
original intent had been to enable these 64-bit instructions to be used on CPUs
that support them even in 32-bit mode. Unfortunately, this form of lying to
the infrastructure was buggy (as explained in the FIXME comment) and had
therefore been disabled.
This re-enables this functionality, using regular DAG nodes, but only when
compiling in 64-bit mode. The old STD_32/EXTSW_32 definitions (which were dead)
are removed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178438 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Like nearbyint, rint can be implemented on PPC using the frin instruction. The
complication comes from the fact that rint needs to set the FE_INEXACT flag
when the result does not equal the input value (and frin does not do that). As
a result, we use a custom inserter which, after the rounding, compares the
rounded value with the original, and if they differ, explicitly sets the XX bit
in the FPSCR register (which corresponds to FE_INEXACT).
Once LLVM has better modeling of the floating-point environment we should be
able to (often) eliminate this extra complexity.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These instructions are available on the P5x (and later) and on the A2. They
implement the standard floating-point rounding operations (floor, trunc, etc.).
One caveat: frin (round to nearest) does not implement "ties to even", and so
is only enabled in fast-math mode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178337 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Compiling in 32-bit mode on a P7 would assert after 64-bit DAG combines were
added for bswap with load/store. This is because these combines are really only
valid in 64-bit mode, regardless of the CPU (and this was not being checked).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178286 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are 64-bit load/store with byte-swap, and available on the P7 and the A2.
Like the similar instructions for 16- and 32-bit words, these are matched in the
target DAG-combine phase against load/store-bswap pairs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178276 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
PPC ISA 2.06 (P7, A2, etc.) has a popcntd instruction. Add this instruction and
tell TTI about it so that popcount-loop recognition will know about it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178233 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There were a few places where kill flags were not being set correctly, and
where 32-bit instruction variants were being used with 64-bit registers. After
r178180, this code was being triggered causing llc to assert.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178220 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It seems that the Darwin PPC assembler requires r0 to be written as 0 when it
means 0 (at least in lwarx/stwcx.). Fixes PR15605.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The R0 register can now be allocated because instructions
that cannot use R0 as a GPR have been appropriately marked.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178123 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some implementation detail in the forgotten past required the link
register to be placed in the GPRC and G8RC register classes. This is
just wrong on the face of it, and causes several extra intersection
register classes to be generated. I found this was having evil
effects on instruction scheduling, by causing the wrong register class
to be consulted for register pressure decisions.
No code generation changes are expected, other than some minor changes
in instruction order. Seven tests in the test bucket required minor
tweaks to adjust to the new normal.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As Bill Schmidt pointed out to me, only on Darwin do we need to spill/restore
VRSAVE in the SjLj code. For non-Darwin, don't spill/restore VRSAVE (and I've
added some asserts to make sure that we're not).
As it turns out, we're not currently handling the Darwin case correctly (I've
added a FIXME in the test case). I've tried adding various implied register
definitions/uses to force the spill without success, so I'll need to address
this later.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178096 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now that the register scavenger can support multiple spill slots, and PEI can
use virtual-register-based scavenging for multiple simultaneous registers, we
can use a virtual register for the transfer register in the CR spilling code.
This should eliminate the last place (outside of the prologue/epilogue) where
we depend on the unconditional availability of the r0 register. We will soon be
able to allocate it (in a somewhat restricted sense) as a GPR.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178060 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Thanks to Jakob for isolating the underlying problem from the
test case in r177423. The original commit had introduced
asymmetric copy operations, but these turned out to be a work-around
to the real problem (the use of == instead of hasSubClassEq in PPCCTRLoops).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177679 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This implements SJLJ lowering on PPC, making the Clang functions
__builtin_{setjmp/longjmp} functional on PPC platforms. The implementation
strategy is similar to that on X86, with the exception that a branch-and-link
variant is used to get the right jump address. Credit goes to Bill Schmidt for
suggesting the use of the unconditional bcl form (instead of the regular bl
instruction) to limit return-address-cache pollution.
Benchmarking the speed at -O3 of:
static jmp_buf env_sigill;
void foo() {
__builtin_longjmp(env_sigill,1);
}
main() {
...
for (int i = 0; i < c; ++i) {
if (__builtin_setjmp(env_sigill)) {
goto done;
} else {
foo();
}
done:;
}
...
}
vs. the same code using the libc setjmp/longjmp functions on a P7 shows that
this builtin implementation is ~4x faster with Altivec enabled and ~7.25x
faster with Altivec disabled. This comparison is somewhat unfair because the
libc version must also save/restore the VSX registers which we don't yet
support.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177666 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Although there is only one Altivec VRSAVE register, it is a member of
a register class, and we need the ability to spill it. Because this
register is normally callee-preserved and handled by special code this
has never before been necessary. However, this capability will be required by
a forthcoming commit adding SjLj support.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The old code used to lower FRAMEADDR tried to replicate the logic in the real
frame-lowering code that determines whether or not the frame pointer (r31) will
be used. When it seemed as through the frame pointer would not be used, the
stack pointer (r1) was used instead. Unfortunately, because the stack size is
not yet known, this does not work. Instead, this change introduces new
always-reserved pseudo-registers (FP and FP8) that are replaced during prologue
insertion with the real frame-pointer register (either r1 or r31).
It is important that this intrinsic always return a valid frame address because
it is used by Clang to store the frame address as part of code generation for
__builtin_setjmp.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177653 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, pre-increment store patterns are written to use two separate
operands to represent address base and displacement:
stwu $rS, $ptroff($ptrreg)
This causes problems when implementing the assembler parser, so this
commit changes the patterns to use standard (complex) memory operands
like in all other memory access instruction patterns:
stwu $rS, $dst
To still match those instructions against the appropriate pre_store
SelectionDAG nodes, the patch uses the new feature that allows a Pat
to match multiple DAG operands against a single (complex) instruction
operand.
Approved by Hal Finkel.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently the PPC r0 register is unconditionally reserved. There are two reasons
for this:
1. r0 is treated specially (as the constant 0) by certain instructions, and so
cannot be used with those instructions as a regular register.
2. r0 is used as a temporary register in the CR-register spilling process
(where, under some circumstances, we require two GPRs).
This change addresses the first reason by introducing a restricted register
class (without r0) for use by those instructions that treat r0 specially. These
register classes have a new pseudo-register, ZERO, which represents the r0-as-0
use. This has the side benefit of making the existing target code simpler (and
easier to understand), and will make it clear to the register allocator that
uses of r0 as 0 don't conflict will real uses of the r0 register.
Once the CR spilling code is improved, we'll be able to allocate r0.
Adding these extra register classes, for some reason unclear to me, causes
requests to the target to copy 32-bit registers to 64-bit registers. The
resulting code seems correct (and causes no test-suite failures), and the new
test case covers this new kind of asymmetric copy.
As r0 is still reserved, no functionality change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177423 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove an accidentally-added instruction definition and add a comment in the
test case. This is in response to a post-commit review by Bill Schmidt.
No functionality change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177404 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
