llvm-6502/lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp

361 lines
12 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- RegisterScavenging.cpp - Machine register scavenging --------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements the machine register scavenger. It can provide
// information, such as unused registers, at any point in a machine basic block.
// It also provides a mechanism to make registers available by evicting them to
// spill slots.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#define DEBUG_TYPE "reg-scavenging"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
Rebuild RegScavenger::DistanceMap each time it is needed. The register scavenger maintains a DistanceMap that maps MI pointers to their distance from the top of the current MBB. The DistanceMap is built incrementally in forward() and in bulk in findFirstUse(). It is used by scavengeRegister() to determine which candidate register has the longest unused interval. Unfortunately the DistanceMap contents can become outdated. The first time scavengeRegister() is called, the DistanceMap is filled to cover the MBB. If then instructions are inserted in the MBB (as they always are following scavengeRegister()), the recorded distances are too short. This causes bad behaviour in the included test case where a register use /after/ the current position is ignored because findFirstUse() thinks is is /before/ the current position. A "using an undefined register" assertion follows promptly. The fix is to build a fresh DistanceMap at the top of scavengeRegister(), and discard it after use. This means that DistanceMap is no longer needed as a RegScavenger member variable, and forward() doesn't need to update it. The fix then discloses issue number two in the same test case: The candidate search in scavengeRegister() finds a CSR that has been saved in the prologue, but is currently unused. It would be both inefficient and wrong to spill such a register in the emergency spill slot. In the present case, the emergency slot restore is placed immediately before the normal epilogue restore, leading to a "Redefining a live register" assertion. Fix number two: When scavengerRegister() stumbles upon an unused register that is overwritten later in the MBB, return that register early. It is important to verify that the register is defined later in the MBB, otherwise it might be an unspilled CSR. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@78650 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-08-11 06:25:12 +00:00
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
using namespace llvm;
/// setUsed - Set the register and its sub-registers as being used.
void RegScavenger::setUsed(unsigned Reg) {
RegsAvailable.reset(Reg);
for (const unsigned *SubRegs = TRI->getSubRegisters(Reg);
unsigned SubReg = *SubRegs; ++SubRegs)
RegsAvailable.reset(SubReg);
}
Rebuild RegScavenger::DistanceMap each time it is needed. The register scavenger maintains a DistanceMap that maps MI pointers to their distance from the top of the current MBB. The DistanceMap is built incrementally in forward() and in bulk in findFirstUse(). It is used by scavengeRegister() to determine which candidate register has the longest unused interval. Unfortunately the DistanceMap contents can become outdated. The first time scavengeRegister() is called, the DistanceMap is filled to cover the MBB. If then instructions are inserted in the MBB (as they always are following scavengeRegister()), the recorded distances are too short. This causes bad behaviour in the included test case where a register use /after/ the current position is ignored because findFirstUse() thinks is is /before/ the current position. A "using an undefined register" assertion follows promptly. The fix is to build a fresh DistanceMap at the top of scavengeRegister(), and discard it after use. This means that DistanceMap is no longer needed as a RegScavenger member variable, and forward() doesn't need to update it. The fix then discloses issue number two in the same test case: The candidate search in scavengeRegister() finds a CSR that has been saved in the prologue, but is currently unused. It would be both inefficient and wrong to spill such a register in the emergency spill slot. In the present case, the emergency slot restore is placed immediately before the normal epilogue restore, leading to a "Redefining a live register" assertion. Fix number two: When scavengerRegister() stumbles upon an unused register that is overwritten later in the MBB, return that register early. It is important to verify that the register is defined later in the MBB, otherwise it might be an unspilled CSR. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@78650 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-08-11 06:25:12 +00:00
bool RegScavenger::isAliasUsed(unsigned Reg) const {
if (isUsed(Reg))
return true;
for (const unsigned *R = TRI->getAliasSet(Reg); *R; ++R)
if (isUsed(*R))
return true;
return false;
}
void RegScavenger::initRegState() {
ScavengedReg = 0;
ScavengedRC = NULL;
ScavengeRestore = NULL;
// All registers started out unused.
RegsAvailable.set();
// Reserved registers are always used.
RegsAvailable ^= ReservedRegs;
if (!MBB)
return;
// Live-in registers are in use.
for (MachineBasicBlock::const_livein_iterator I = MBB->livein_begin(),
E = MBB->livein_end(); I != E; ++I)
setUsed(*I);
// Pristine CSRs are also unavailable.
BitVector PR = MBB->getParent()->getFrameInfo()->getPristineRegs(MBB);
for (int I = PR.find_first(); I>0; I = PR.find_next(I))
setUsed(I);
}
void RegScavenger::enterBasicBlock(MachineBasicBlock *mbb) {
MachineFunction &MF = *mbb->getParent();
const TargetMachine &TM = MF.getTarget();
TII = TM.getInstrInfo();
TRI = TM.getRegisterInfo();
MRI = &MF.getRegInfo();
assert((NumPhysRegs == 0 || NumPhysRegs == TRI->getNumRegs()) &&
"Target changed?");
// Self-initialize.
if (!MBB) {
NumPhysRegs = TRI->getNumRegs();
RegsAvailable.resize(NumPhysRegs);
// Create reserved registers bitvector.
ReservedRegs = TRI->getReservedRegs(MF);
// Create callee-saved registers bitvector.
CalleeSavedRegs.resize(NumPhysRegs);
const unsigned *CSRegs = TRI->getCalleeSavedRegs();
if (CSRegs != NULL)
for (unsigned i = 0; CSRegs[i]; ++i)
CalleeSavedRegs.set(CSRegs[i]);
}
MBB = mbb;
initRegState();
Tracking = false;
}
void RegScavenger::addRegWithSubRegs(BitVector &BV, unsigned Reg) {
BV.set(Reg);
for (const unsigned *R = TRI->getSubRegisters(Reg); *R; R++)
BV.set(*R);
}
void RegScavenger::addRegWithAliases(BitVector &BV, unsigned Reg) {
BV.set(Reg);
for (const unsigned *R = TRI->getAliasSet(Reg); *R; R++)
BV.set(*R);
}
void RegScavenger::forward() {
// Move ptr forward.
if (!Tracking) {
MBBI = MBB->begin();
Tracking = true;
} else {
assert(MBBI != MBB->end() && "Already at the end of the basic block!");
MBBI = next(MBBI);
}
MachineInstr *MI = MBBI;
if (MI == ScavengeRestore) {
ScavengedReg = 0;
ScavengedRC = NULL;
ScavengeRestore = NULL;
}
// Find out which registers are early clobbered, killed, defined, and marked
// def-dead in this instruction.
BitVector EarlyClobberRegs(NumPhysRegs);
BitVector KillRegs(NumPhysRegs);
BitVector DefRegs(NumPhysRegs);
BitVector DeadRegs(NumPhysRegs);
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
if (!MO.isReg() || MO.isUndef())
continue;
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (!Reg || isReserved(Reg))
continue;
if (MO.isUse()) {
// Two-address operands implicitly kill.
if (MO.isKill() || MI->isRegTiedToDefOperand(i))
addRegWithSubRegs(KillRegs, Reg);
} else {
assert(MO.isDef());
if (MO.isDead())
addRegWithSubRegs(DeadRegs, Reg);
else
addRegWithSubRegs(DefRegs, Reg);
if (MO.isEarlyClobber())
addRegWithAliases(EarlyClobberRegs, Reg);
}
}
// Verify uses and defs.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
if (!MO.isReg() || MO.isUndef())
continue;
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (!Reg || isReserved(Reg))
continue;
if (MO.isUse()) {
if (!isUsed(Reg)) {
// Check if it's partial live: e.g.
// D0 = insert_subreg D0<undef>, S0
// ... D0
// The problem is the insert_subreg could be eliminated. The use of
// D0 is using a partially undef value. This is not *incorrect* since
// S1 is can be freely clobbered.
// Ideally we would like a way to model this, but leaving the
// insert_subreg around causes both correctness and performance issues.
bool SubUsed = false;
for (const unsigned *SubRegs = TRI->getSubRegisters(Reg);
unsigned SubReg = *SubRegs; ++SubRegs)
if (isUsed(SubReg)) {
SubUsed = true;
break;
}
assert(SubUsed && "Using an undefined register!");
}
assert((!EarlyClobberRegs.test(Reg) || MI->isRegTiedToDefOperand(i)) &&
"Using an early clobbered register!");
} else {
assert(MO.isDef());
Fix PR5024 with a big hammer: disable the double-def assertion in the scavenger. LiveVariables add implicit kills to correctly track partial register kills. This works well enough and is fairly accurate. But coalescer can make it impossible to maintain these markers. e.g. BL <ga:sss1>, %R0<kill,undef>, %S0<kill>, %R0<imp-def>, %R1<imp-def,dead>, %R2<imp-def,dead>, %R3<imp-def,dead>, %R12<imp-def,dead>, %LR<imp-def,dead>, %D0<imp-def>, ... ... %reg1031<def> = FLDS <cp#1>, 0, 14, %reg0, Mem:LD4[ConstantPool] ... %S0<def> = FCPYS %reg1031<kill>, 14, %reg0, %D0<imp-use,kill> When reg1031 and S0 are coalesced, the copy (FCPYS) will be eliminated the the implicit-kill of D0 is lost. In this case it's possible to move the marker to the FLDS. But in many cases, this is not possible. Suppose %reg1031<def> = FOO <cp#1>, %D0<imp-def> ... %S0<def> = FCPYS %reg1031<kill>, 14, %reg0, %D0<imp-use,kill> When FCPYS goes away, the definition of S0 is the "FOO" instruction. However, transferring the D0 implicit-kill to FOO doesn't work since it is the def of D0 itself. We need to fix this in another time by introducing a "kill" pseudo instruction to track liveness. Disabling the assertion is not ideal, but machine verifier is doing that job now. It's important to know double-def is not a miscomputation since it means a register should be free but it's not tracked as free. It's a performance issue instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@82677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-09-24 02:27:09 +00:00
#if 0
// FIXME: Enable this once we've figured out how to correctly transfer
// implicit kills during codegen passes like the coalescer.
assert((KillRegs.test(Reg) || isUnused(Reg) ||
isLiveInButUnusedBefore(Reg, MI, MBB, TRI, MRI)) &&
"Re-defining a live register!");
Fix PR5024 with a big hammer: disable the double-def assertion in the scavenger. LiveVariables add implicit kills to correctly track partial register kills. This works well enough and is fairly accurate. But coalescer can make it impossible to maintain these markers. e.g. BL <ga:sss1>, %R0<kill,undef>, %S0<kill>, %R0<imp-def>, %R1<imp-def,dead>, %R2<imp-def,dead>, %R3<imp-def,dead>, %R12<imp-def,dead>, %LR<imp-def,dead>, %D0<imp-def>, ... ... %reg1031<def> = FLDS <cp#1>, 0, 14, %reg0, Mem:LD4[ConstantPool] ... %S0<def> = FCPYS %reg1031<kill>, 14, %reg0, %D0<imp-use,kill> When reg1031 and S0 are coalesced, the copy (FCPYS) will be eliminated the the implicit-kill of D0 is lost. In this case it's possible to move the marker to the FLDS. But in many cases, this is not possible. Suppose %reg1031<def> = FOO <cp#1>, %D0<imp-def> ... %S0<def> = FCPYS %reg1031<kill>, 14, %reg0, %D0<imp-use,kill> When FCPYS goes away, the definition of S0 is the "FOO" instruction. However, transferring the D0 implicit-kill to FOO doesn't work since it is the def of D0 itself. We need to fix this in another time by introducing a "kill" pseudo instruction to track liveness. Disabling the assertion is not ideal, but machine verifier is doing that job now. It's important to know double-def is not a miscomputation since it means a register should be free but it's not tracked as free. It's a performance issue instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@82677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-09-24 02:27:09 +00:00
#endif
}
}
// Commit the changes.
setUnused(KillRegs);
setUnused(DeadRegs);
setUsed(DefRegs);
}
void RegScavenger::getRegsUsed(BitVector &used, bool includeReserved) {
if (includeReserved)
used = ~RegsAvailable;
else
used = ~RegsAvailable & ~ReservedRegs;
}
/// CreateRegClassMask - Set the bits that represent the registers in the
/// TargetRegisterClass.
static void CreateRegClassMask(const TargetRegisterClass *RC, BitVector &Mask) {
for (TargetRegisterClass::iterator I = RC->begin(), E = RC->end(); I != E;
++I)
Mask.set(*I);
}
unsigned RegScavenger::FindUnusedReg(const TargetRegisterClass *RC) const {
for (TargetRegisterClass::iterator I = RC->begin(), E = RC->end();
I != E; ++I)
if (!isAliasUsed(*I))
return *I;
return 0;
}
/// findSurvivorReg - Return the candidate register that is unused for the
/// longest after MBBI. UseMI is set to the instruction where the search
/// stopped.
///
/// No more than InstrLimit instructions are inspected.
///
unsigned RegScavenger::findSurvivorReg(MachineBasicBlock::iterator StartMI,
BitVector &Candidates,
unsigned InstrLimit,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator &UseMI) {
int Survivor = Candidates.find_first();
assert(Survivor > 0 && "No candidates for scavenging");
MachineBasicBlock::iterator ME = MBB->getFirstTerminator();
assert(StartMI != ME && "MI already at terminator");
MachineBasicBlock::iterator RestorePointMI = StartMI;
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI = StartMI;
bool inVirtLiveRange = false;
for (++MI; InstrLimit > 0 && MI != ME; ++MI, --InstrLimit) {
bool isVirtKillInsn = false;
bool isVirtDefInsn = false;
// Remove any candidates touched by instruction.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
if (!MO.isReg() || MO.isUndef() || !MO.getReg())
continue;
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(MO.getReg())) {
if (MO.isDef())
isVirtDefInsn = true;
else if (MO.isKill())
isVirtKillInsn = true;
continue;
}
Candidates.reset(MO.getReg());
for (const unsigned *R = TRI->getAliasSet(MO.getReg()); *R; R++)
Candidates.reset(*R);
}
// If we're not in a virtual reg's live range, this is a valid
// restore point.
if (!inVirtLiveRange) RestorePointMI = MI;
// Update whether we're in the live range of a virtual register
if (isVirtKillInsn) inVirtLiveRange = false;
if (isVirtDefInsn) inVirtLiveRange = true;
Rebuild RegScavenger::DistanceMap each time it is needed. The register scavenger maintains a DistanceMap that maps MI pointers to their distance from the top of the current MBB. The DistanceMap is built incrementally in forward() and in bulk in findFirstUse(). It is used by scavengeRegister() to determine which candidate register has the longest unused interval. Unfortunately the DistanceMap contents can become outdated. The first time scavengeRegister() is called, the DistanceMap is filled to cover the MBB. If then instructions are inserted in the MBB (as they always are following scavengeRegister()), the recorded distances are too short. This causes bad behaviour in the included test case where a register use /after/ the current position is ignored because findFirstUse() thinks is is /before/ the current position. A "using an undefined register" assertion follows promptly. The fix is to build a fresh DistanceMap at the top of scavengeRegister(), and discard it after use. This means that DistanceMap is no longer needed as a RegScavenger member variable, and forward() doesn't need to update it. The fix then discloses issue number two in the same test case: The candidate search in scavengeRegister() finds a CSR that has been saved in the prologue, but is currently unused. It would be both inefficient and wrong to spill such a register in the emergency spill slot. In the present case, the emergency slot restore is placed immediately before the normal epilogue restore, leading to a "Redefining a live register" assertion. Fix number two: When scavengerRegister() stumbles upon an unused register that is overwritten later in the MBB, return that register early. It is important to verify that the register is defined later in the MBB, otherwise it might be an unspilled CSR. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@78650 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-08-11 06:25:12 +00:00
// Was our survivor untouched by this instruction?
if (Candidates.test(Survivor))
Rebuild RegScavenger::DistanceMap each time it is needed. The register scavenger maintains a DistanceMap that maps MI pointers to their distance from the top of the current MBB. The DistanceMap is built incrementally in forward() and in bulk in findFirstUse(). It is used by scavengeRegister() to determine which candidate register has the longest unused interval. Unfortunately the DistanceMap contents can become outdated. The first time scavengeRegister() is called, the DistanceMap is filled to cover the MBB. If then instructions are inserted in the MBB (as they always are following scavengeRegister()), the recorded distances are too short. This causes bad behaviour in the included test case where a register use /after/ the current position is ignored because findFirstUse() thinks is is /before/ the current position. A "using an undefined register" assertion follows promptly. The fix is to build a fresh DistanceMap at the top of scavengeRegister(), and discard it after use. This means that DistanceMap is no longer needed as a RegScavenger member variable, and forward() doesn't need to update it. The fix then discloses issue number two in the same test case: The candidate search in scavengeRegister() finds a CSR that has been saved in the prologue, but is currently unused. It would be both inefficient and wrong to spill such a register in the emergency spill slot. In the present case, the emergency slot restore is placed immediately before the normal epilogue restore, leading to a "Redefining a live register" assertion. Fix number two: When scavengerRegister() stumbles upon an unused register that is overwritten later in the MBB, return that register early. It is important to verify that the register is defined later in the MBB, otherwise it might be an unspilled CSR. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@78650 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-08-11 06:25:12 +00:00
continue;
// All candidates gone?
if (Candidates.none())
break;
Survivor = Candidates.find_first();
}
// If we ran off the end, that's where we want to restore.
if (MI == ME) RestorePointMI = ME;
assert (RestorePointMI != StartMI &&
"No available scavenger restore location!");
// We ran out of candidates, so stop the search.
UseMI = RestorePointMI;
return Survivor;
}
unsigned RegScavenger::scavengeRegister(const TargetRegisterClass *RC,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator I,
int SPAdj) {
// Mask off the registers which are not in the TargetRegisterClass.
BitVector Candidates(NumPhysRegs, false);
CreateRegClassMask(RC, Candidates);
// Do not include reserved registers.
Candidates ^= ReservedRegs & Candidates;
// Exclude all the registers being used by the instruction.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
MachineOperand &MO = I->getOperand(i);
if (MO.isReg() && MO.getReg() != 0 &&
!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(MO.getReg()))
Candidates.reset(MO.getReg());
}
// Find the register whose use is furthest away.
MachineBasicBlock::iterator UseMI;
unsigned SReg = findSurvivorReg(I, Candidates, 25, UseMI);
Rebuild RegScavenger::DistanceMap each time it is needed. The register scavenger maintains a DistanceMap that maps MI pointers to their distance from the top of the current MBB. The DistanceMap is built incrementally in forward() and in bulk in findFirstUse(). It is used by scavengeRegister() to determine which candidate register has the longest unused interval. Unfortunately the DistanceMap contents can become outdated. The first time scavengeRegister() is called, the DistanceMap is filled to cover the MBB. If then instructions are inserted in the MBB (as they always are following scavengeRegister()), the recorded distances are too short. This causes bad behaviour in the included test case where a register use /after/ the current position is ignored because findFirstUse() thinks is is /before/ the current position. A "using an undefined register" assertion follows promptly. The fix is to build a fresh DistanceMap at the top of scavengeRegister(), and discard it after use. This means that DistanceMap is no longer needed as a RegScavenger member variable, and forward() doesn't need to update it. The fix then discloses issue number two in the same test case: The candidate search in scavengeRegister() finds a CSR that has been saved in the prologue, but is currently unused. It would be both inefficient and wrong to spill such a register in the emergency spill slot. In the present case, the emergency slot restore is placed immediately before the normal epilogue restore, leading to a "Redefining a live register" assertion. Fix number two: When scavengerRegister() stumbles upon an unused register that is overwritten later in the MBB, return that register early. It is important to verify that the register is defined later in the MBB, otherwise it might be an unspilled CSR. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@78650 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2009-08-11 06:25:12 +00:00
// If we found an unused register there is no reason to spill it. We have
// probably found a callee-saved register that has been saved in the
// prologue, but happens to be unused at this point.
if (!isAliasUsed(SReg))
return SReg;
assert(ScavengedReg == 0 &&
"Scavenger slot is live, unable to scavenge another register!");
// Avoid infinite regress
ScavengedReg = SReg;
// If the target knows how to save/restore the register, let it do so;
// otherwise, use the emergency stack spill slot.
if (!TRI->saveScavengerRegister(*MBB, I, UseMI, RC, SReg)) {
// Spill the scavenged register before I.
assert(ScavengingFrameIndex >= 0 &&
"Cannot scavenge register without an emergency spill slot!");
TII->storeRegToStackSlot(*MBB, I, SReg, true, ScavengingFrameIndex, RC);
MachineBasicBlock::iterator II = prior(I);
TRI->eliminateFrameIndex(II, SPAdj, NULL, this);
// Restore the scavenged register before its use (or first terminator).
TII->loadRegFromStackSlot(*MBB, UseMI, SReg, ScavengingFrameIndex, RC);
II = prior(UseMI);
TRI->eliminateFrameIndex(II, SPAdj, NULL, this);
}
ScavengeRestore = prior(UseMI);
// Doing this here leads to infinite regress.
// ScavengedReg = SReg;
ScavengedRC = RC;
return SReg;
}