and positive: positive, because it could be directly computed to be positive;
negative, because the nsw flags means it is either negative or undefined (the
multiplication always overflowed).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@145104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with the given predicate, it matches any condition and returns the
predicate - d'oh! Original commit message:
The expression icmp eq (select (icmp eq x, 0), 1, x), 0 folds to false.
Spotted by my super-optimizer in 186.crafty and 450.soplex. We really
need a proper infrastructure for handling generalizations of this kind
of thing (which occur a lot), however this case is so simple that I decided
to go ahead and implement it directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@143318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Spotted by my super-optimizer in 186.crafty and 450.soplex. We really
need a proper infrastructure for handling generalizations of this kind
of thing (which occur a lot), however this case is so simple that I decided
to go ahead and implement it directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@143214 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
using BinaryOperator (which only works for instructions) when it should have
been a cast to OverflowingBinaryOperator (which also works for constants).
While there, correct a few other dubious looking uses of BinaryOperator.
Thanks to Chad Rosier for the testcase. Original commit message:
My super-optimizer noticed that we weren't folding this expression to
true: (x *nsw x) sgt 0, where x = (y | 1). This occurs in 464.h264ref.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@143125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
often expressed as "x >= y ? x : y", there is a good chance we can extract
the existing "x >= y" from it and use that as a replacement for "max(x,y)==x".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131049 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
but according to my super-optimizer there are only two missed simplifications
of -instsimplify kind when compiling bzip2, and this is one of them. It amuses
me to have bzip2 be perfectly optimized as far as instsimplify goes!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130840 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
max(a,b) >= a -> true. According to my super-optimizer, these are
by far the most common simplifications (of the -instsimplify kind)
that occur in the testsuite and aren't caught by -std-compile-opts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130780 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This automagically provides a transform noticed by my super-optimizer
as occurring quite often: "rem x, (select cond, x, 1)" -> 0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130694 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
gave up when I realized I couldn't come up with a good name for what the
refactored function would be, to describe what it does.
This is PR9343 test12, which is test3 with arguments reordered. Whoops!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@127318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
possible. This goes into instcombine and instsimplify because instsimplify
doesn't need to check hasOneUse since it returns (almost exclusively) constants.
This fixes PR9343 #4#5 and #8!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@127064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
"icmp pred %X, CI" and a number of examples where "%X = binop %Y, CI2".
Some of these cases (div and rem) used to make it through opt -O2, but the
others are probably now making code elsewhere redundant (probably instcombine).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126988 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
more work to do here, "icmp ult (urem X, 10), 11" doesn't optimize away yet.
Fixes example 3 from PR9343!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126741 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
plus some variations of this. According to my auto-simplifier this occurs a lot
but usually in combination with max/min idioms. Because max/min aren't handled
yet this unfortunately doesn't have much effect in the testsuite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@125462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
auto-simplifier). This has a big impact on Ada code, but not much else.
Unfortunately the impact is mostly negative! This is due to PR9004 (aka
SCCP failing to resolve conditional branch conditions in the destination
blocks of the branch), in which simple correlated expressions are not
resolved but complicated ones are, so simplifying has a bad effect!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
overflow (nsw flag), which was disabled because it breaks 254.gap. I have
informed the GAP authors of the mistake in their code, and arranged for the
testsuite to use -fwrapv when compiling this benchmark.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to do this and more, but would only do it if X/Y had only one use. Spotted as the
most common missed simplification in SPEC by my auto-simplifier, now that it knows
about nuw/nsw/exact flags. This removes a bunch of multiplications from 447.dealII
and 483.xalancbmk. It also removes a lot from tramp3d-v4, which results in much
more inlining.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124560 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
benchmarks, and that it can be simplified to X/Y. (In general you can only
simplify (Z*Y)/Y to Z if the multiplication did not overflow; if Z has the
form "X/Y" then this is the case). This patch implements that transform and
moves some Div logic out of instcombine and into InstructionSimplify.
Unfortunately instcombine gets in the way somewhat, since it likes to change
(X/Y)*Y into X-(X rem Y), so I had to teach instcombine about this too.
Finally, thanks to the NSW/NUW flags, sometimes we know directly that "Z*Y"
does not overflow, because the flag says so, so I added that logic too. This
eliminates a bunch of divisions and subtractions in 447.dealII, and has good
effects on some other benchmarks too. It seems to have quite an effect on
tramp3d-v4 but it's hard to say if it's good or bad because inlining decisions
changed, resulting in massive changes all over.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124487 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
optimized code are:
(non-negative number)+(power-of-two) != 0 -> true
and
(x | 1) != 0 -> true
Instcombine knows about the second one of course, but only does it if X|1
has only one use. These fire thousands of times in the testsuite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124183 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
auto-simplier the transform most missed by early-cse is (zext X) != 0 -> X != 0.
This patch adds this transform and some related logic to InstructionSimplify
and removes some of the logic from instcombine (unfortunately not all because
there are several situations in which instcombine can improve things by making
new instructions, whereas instsimplify is not allowed to do this). At -O2 this
often results in more than 15% more simplifications by early-cse, and results in
hundreds of lines of bitcode being eliminated from the testsuite. I did see some
small negative effects in the testsuite, for example a few additional instructions
in three programs. One program, 483.xalancbmk, got an additional 35 instructions,
which seems to be due to a function getting an additional instruction and then
being inlined all over the place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123911 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These were not recommended by my auto-simplifier since they don't fire often enough.
However they do fire from time to time, for example they remove one subtraction from
the final bitcode for 483.xalancbmk.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
simplification in fully optimized code. It occurs sporadically in the testsuite, and
many times in 403.gcc: the final bitcode has 131 fewer subtractions after this change.
The reason that the multiplies are not eliminated is the same reason that instcombine
did not catch this: they are used by other instructions (instcombine catches this with
a more general transform which in general is only profitable if the operands have only
one use).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123754 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
