- The search bounds are constant, in the worst case (ARM target) it will scan over 30 uint16_ts.
- This method isn't very hot, I had problems finding a testcase where it's called more than a dozen of times (no perf impact).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151773 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead of nested switch statements, use a lookup table. On ARM, this replaces
a 23k (x86_64 release build) function with a 16k table. Its not unlikely to
be faster, as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151751 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This requires some gymnastics to make it available for C code. Remove the names
from the disassembler tables, making them relocation free.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@150303 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Make them accessible through MCInstrInfo. They are only used for debugging purposes so this doesn't
have an impact on performance. X86MCTargetDesc.o goes from 630K to 461K on x86_64.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@150245 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When adding the {-1, -1} entry to the DFAStateInputTable, we
need to increment the index used to populate the DFAStateEntryTable.
Otherwise, the entry table will be off by one for each transition
after the {-1, -1} entry. PR11908.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@149713 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is simpler to define a composite index directly:
def ssub_2 : SubRegIndex<[dsub_1, ssub_0]>;
def ssub_3 : SubRegIndex<[dsub_1, ssub_1]>;
Than specifying the composite indices on each register:
CompositeIndices = [(ssub_2 dsub_1, ssub_0),
(ssub_3 dsub_1, ssub_1)] in ...
This also makes it clear that SubRegIndex composition is supposed to be
unique.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@149556 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The final tie breaker comparison also needs to return +/-1, or 0.
This is not a less() function.
This could cause otherwise identical super-classes to be ordered
unstably, depending on what the system qsort routine does with a bad
compare function.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@149549 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This class is used to represent SubRegIndex instances instead of the raw
Record pointers that were used before.
No functional change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@149418 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When set, this bit indicates that a register is completely defined by
the value of its sub-registers.
Use the CoveredBySubRegs property to infer which super-registers are
call-preserved given a list of callee-saved registers. For example, the
ARM registers D8-D15 are callee-saved. This now automatically implies
that Q4-Q7 are call-preserved.
Conversely, Win64 callees save XMM6-XMM15, but the corresponding
YMM6-YMM15 registers are not call-preserved because they are not fully
defined by their sub-registers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148363 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Targets can now add CalleeSavedRegs defs to their *CallingConv.td file.
TableGen will use this to create a *_SaveList array suitable for
returning from getCalleeSavedRegs() as well as a *_RegMask bit mask
suitable for returning from getCallPreservedMask().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148346 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(This time I believe I've checked all the -Wreturn-type warnings from GCC & added the couple of llvm_unreachables necessary to silence them. If I've missed any, I'll happily fix them as soon as I know about them)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148262 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code type was always identical to a string anyway. Now it is simply
a synonym. The code literal syntax [{...}] is still valid.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
