a single early exit.
And factor the subsequent cast<> from all but one block into a single
variable.
No functionality changed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216645 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
functionality changed.
Separating this into two functions wasn't helping. There was a decent
amount of boilerplate duplicated, and some subsequent refactorings here
will pull even more common code out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Introduce support::ulittleX_t::ref type to Support/Endian.h and use it in x86 JIT
to enforce correct endianness and fix unaligned accesses.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: ributzka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5011
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216631 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently instructions are folded very aggressively into the memory operation,
which can lead to the use of killed operands:
%vreg1<def> = ADDXri %vreg0<kill>, 2
%vreg2<def> = LDRBBui %vreg0, 2
... = ... %vreg1 ...
This usually happens when the result is also used by another non-memory
instruction in the same basic block, or any instruction in another basic block.
If the computed address is used by only memory operations in the same basic
block, then it is safe to fold them. This is because all memory operations will
fold the address computation and the original computation will never be emitted.
This fixes rdar://problem/18142857.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216629 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When the address comes directly from a shift instruction then the address
computation cannot be folded into the memory instruction, because the zero
register is not available as a base register. Simplify addess needs to emit the
shift instruction and use the result as base register.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216621 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the zero register directly when possible to avoid an unnecessary register
copy and a wasted register at -O0. This also uses integer stores to store a
positive floating-point zero. This saves us from materializing the positive zero
in a register and then storing it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216617 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instructions like 'fxsave' and control flow instructions like 'jne'
match any operand size. The loop I added to the Intel syntax matcher
assumed that using a different size would give a different instruction.
Now it handles the case where we get the same instruction for different
memory operand sizes.
This also allows us to remove the hack we had for unsized absolute
memory operands, because we can successfully match things like 'jnz'
without reporting ambiguity. Removing this hack uncovered test case
involving 'fadd' that was ambiguous. The memory operand could have been
single or double precision.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216604 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
int may not have enough bits in it, which was detected by UBSan
bootstrap (it reported left shift by a too large constant).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216579 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This teaches the AArch64 backend to deal with the operations required
to deal with the operations on v4f16 and v8f16 which are exposed by
NEON intrinsics, plus the add, sub, mul and div operations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216555 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
we stopped efficiently lowering sextload using the SSE41 instructions
for that operation.
This is a consequence of a bad predicate I used thinking of the memory
access needs. The code actually handles the cases where the predicate
doesn't apply, and handles them much better. =] Simple fix and a test
case added. Fixes PR20767.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216538 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This combine is essentially combining target-specific nodes back into target
independent nodes that it "knows" will be combined yet again by a target
independent DAG combine into a different set of target-independent nodes that
are legal (not custom though!) and thus "ok". This seems... deeply flawed. The
crux of the problem is that we don't combine un-legalized shuffles that are
introduced by legalizing other operations, and thus we don't see a very
profitable combine opportunity. So the backend just forces the input to that
combine to re-appear.
However, for this to work, the conditions detected to re-form the unlegalized
nodes must be *exactly* right. Previously, failing this would have caused poor
code (if you're lucky) or a crasher when we failed to select instructions.
After r215611 we would fall back into the legalizer. In some cases, this just
"fixed" the crasher by produces bad code. But in the test case added it caused
the legalizer and the dag combiner to iterate forever.
The fix is to make the alignment checking in the x86 side of things match the
alignment checking in the generic DAG combine exactly. This isn't really a
satisfying or principled fix, but it at least make the code work as intended.
It also highlights that it would be nice to detect the availability of under
aligned loads for a given type rather than bailing on this optimization. I've
left a FIXME to document this.
Original commit message for r215611 which covers the rest of the chang:
[SDAG] Fix a case where we would iteratively legalize a node during
combining by replacing it with something else but not re-process the
node afterward to remove it.
In a truly remarkable stroke of bad luck, this would (in the test case
attached) end up getting some other node combined into it without ever
getting re-processed. By adding it back on to the worklist, in addition
to deleting the dead nodes more quickly we also ensure that if it
*stops* being dead for any reason it makes it back through the
legalizer. Without this, the test case will end up failing during
instruction selection due to an and node with a type we don't have an
instruction pattern for.
It took many million runs of the shuffle fuzz tester to find this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216537 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When a shift with extension or an add with shift and extension cannot be folded
into the memory operation, then the address calculation has to be materialized
separately. While doing so the code forgot to consider a possible sign-/zero-
extension. This fix folds now also the sign-/zero-extension into the add or
shift instruction which is used to materialize the address.
This fixes rdar://problem/18141718.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216511 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The existing matcher has lots of AT&T assembly dialect assumptions baked
into it. In particular, the hack for resolving the size of a memory
operand by appending the four most common suffixes doesn't work at all.
The Intel assembly dialect mnemonic table has ambiguous entries, so we
need to try matching multiple times with different operand sizes, since
that's the only way to choose different instruction variants.
This makes us more compatible with gas's implementation of Intel
assembly syntax. MSVC assumes you want byte-sized operations for the
instructions that we reject as ambiguous.
Reviewed By: grosbach
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4747
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It seems on Darwin the illegal round-trip ::iterator -> MachineInstr* -> ::iterator breaks execution horribly when the iterator is not a real MachineInstr, like ::end().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216455 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Take a StringRef instead of a "const char *".
Take a "std::error_code &" instead of a "std::string &" for error.
A create static method would be even better, but this patch is already a bit too
big.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This actually was caught by existing tests but those tests were disabled
with an XFAIL because of PR20736. While working on fixing that,
I noticed the test failure, and tracked it down to this.
We even have a really nice Clang warning that would have caught this but
it isn't enabled in LLVM! =[ I may look at enabling it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216391 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds support to recognize division by uniform power of 2 and modifies the cost table to vectorize division by uniform power of 2 whenever possible.
Updates Cost model for Loop and SLP Vectorizer.The cost table is currently only updated for X86 backend.
Thanks to Hal, Andrea, Sanjay for the review. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D4971)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216371 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adds code generation support for dcbtst (data cache prefetch for write) and
icbt (instruction cache prefetch for read - Book E cores only).
We still end up with a 'cannot select' error for the non-supported prefetch
intrinsic forms. This will be fixed in a later commit.
Fixes PR20692.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216339 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r215862 due to nightly failures. Will work on getting a
reduced test case, but I wanted to get our bots green in the meantime.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
these DAG combines.
The DAG auto-CSE thing is truly terrible. Due to it, when RAUW-ing
a node with its operand, you can cause its uses to CSE to itself, which
then causes their uses to become your uses which causes them to be
picked up by the RAUW. For nodes that are determined to be "no-ops",
this is "fine". But if the RAUW is one of several steps to enact
a transformation, this causes the DAG to really silently eat an discard
nodes that you would never expect. It took days for me to actually
pinpoint a test case triggering this and a really frustrating amount of
time to even comprehend the bug because I never even thought about the
ability of RAUW to iteratively consume nodes due to CSE-ing them into
itself.
To fix this, we have to build up a brand-new chain of operations any
time we are combining across (potentially) intervening nodes. But once
the logic is added to do this, another issue surfaces: CombineTo eagerly
deletes the one node combined, *but no others*. This is... really
frustrating. If deleting it makes its operands become dead, those
operand nodes often won't go onto the worklist in the
order you would want -- they're already on it and not near the top. That
means things higher on the worklist will get combined prior to these
dead nodes being GCed out of the worklist, and if the chain is long, the
immediate users won't be enough to re-detect where the root of the chain
is that became single-use again after deleting the dead nodes. The
better way to do this is to never immediately delete nodes, and instead
to just enqueue them so we can recursively delete them. The
combined-from node is typically not on the worklist anyways by virtue of
having been popped off.... But that in turn breaks other tests that
*require* CombineTo to delete unused nodes. :: sigh ::
Fortunately, there is a better way. This whole routine should have been
returning the replacement rather than using CombineTo which is quite
hacky. Switch to that, and all the pieces fall together.
I suspect the same kind of miscompile is possible in the half-shuffle
folding code, and potentially the recursive folding code. I'll be
switching those over to a pattern more like this one for safety's sake
even though I don't immediately have any test cases for them. Note that
the only way I got a test case for this instance was with *heavily* DAG
combined 256-bit shuffle sequences generated by my fuzzer. ;]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216319 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There's no need to do this if the user doesn't call va_start. In the
future, we're going to have thunks that forward these register
parameters with musttail calls, and they won't need these spills for
handling va_start.
Most of the test suite changes are adding va_start calls to existing
tests to keep things working.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216294 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
