Inline asm may specify 'U' and 'X' constraints to print a 'u' for an
update-form memory reference, or an 'x' for an indexed-form memory
reference. However, these are really only useful in GCC internal code
generation. In inline asm the operand of the memory constraint is
typically just a register containing the address, so 'U' and 'X' make
no sense.
This patch quietly accepts 'U' and 'X' in inline asm patterns, but
otherwise does nothing. If we ever unexpectedly see a non-register,
we'll assert and sort it out afterwards.
I've added a new test for these constraints; the test case should be
used for other asm-constraints changes down the road.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217622 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Do
(shl (add x, c1), c2) -> (add (shl x, c2), c1 << c2)
This is already done for multiplies, but since multiplies
by powers of two are turned into shifts, we also need
to handle it here.
This might want checks for isLegalAddImmediate to avoid
transforming an add of a legal immediate with one that isn't.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217610 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r189189 implemented AVX512 unpack by essentially performing a 256-bit unpack
between the low and the high 256 bits of src1 into the low part of the
destination and another unpack of the low and high 256 bits of src2 into the
high part of the destination.
I don't think that's how unpack works. AVX512 unpack simply has more 128-bit
lanes but other than it works the same way as AVX. So in each 128-bit lane,
we're always interleaving certain parts of both operands rather different
parts of one of the operands.
E.g. for this:
__v16sf a = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 };
__v16sf b = { 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 };
__v16sf c = __builtin_shufflevector(a, b, 0, 8, 1, 9, 4, 12, 5, 13, 16,
24, 17, 25, 20, 28, 21, 29);
we generated punpcklps (notice how the elements of a and b are not interleaved
in the shuffle). In turn, c was set to this:
0 16 1 17 4 20 5 21 8 24 9 25 12 28 13 29
Obviously this should have just returned the mask vector of the shuffle
vector.
I mostly reverted this change and made sure the original AVX code worked
for 512-bit vectors as well.
Also updated the tests because they matched the logic from the code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is an extension of the change made with r215820:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=215820
That patch allowed combining of splatted vector FP constants that are multiplied.
This patch allows combining non-uniform vector FP constants too by relaxing the
check on the type of vector. Also, canonicalize a vector fmul in the
same way that we already do for scalars - if only one operand of the fmul is a
constant, make it operand 1. Otherwise, we miss potential folds.
This fold is also done by -instcombine, but it's possible that extra
fmuls may have been generated during lowering.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5254
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217599 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Refactored the R600_LDS_1A2D class a bit to get it to actually work.
It seemed to be previously unused and broken.
We also have to disable the conversion to the noret variant for now in
R600ISelLowering because the getLDSNoRetOp method only handles 1A1D LDS ops.
Someone can feel free to modify the AMDGPU::getLDSNoRetOp method to
work for more than 1A1D variants of LDS operations. It's being left as a
future TODO for now.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Watry <awatry at gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Arsenault <matthew.arsenault@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217596 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now that the operations are all implemented, we can test this sub-arch here.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Arsenault <matthew.arsenault@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217595 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was only present for SI before.
Cayman may still be missing, but I am unable to test that currently.
v2: Don't create atomicrmw max tests in separate file
Signed-off-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Arsenault <matthew.arsenault@amd.com>
CC: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217589 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
They were used in the 'Module Structure' example but weren't otherwise
documented.
Credit to Reed Kotler for noticing.
Reviewers: hans
Reviewed By: hans
Subscribers: hans, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5191
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217583 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
David Blaikie's commits r217563 & r217564, which added shared_ptr to the
CostPool have fixed some memory leak issues exposed by the PBQP with
coalescing constraints.
The sanitizer bot was failing because of those leaks. Now that the leaks
are gone, we can reenable the aarch64/pbqp test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217580 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We used to crash processing any relevant @llvm.assume on a 32-bit target
(because we'd ask SE to subtract expressions of differing types). I've copied
our 'simple.ll' test, but with the data layout from arm-linux-gnueabihf to get
some meaningful test coverage here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Leveraging both intrusive shared_ptr-ing (std::enable_shared_from_this)
and shared_ptr<T>-owning-U (to allow external users to hold
std::shared_ptr<CostT> while keeping the underlying PoolEntry alive).
The intrusiveness could be removed if we had a weak_set that implicitly
removed items from the set when their underlying data went away.
This /might/ fix an existing memory leak reported by LeakSanitizer in
r217504.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Need to convert the 64 element offset into bytes, not just the element
size like the normal case instructions.
Noticed by inspection. This can't be hit now because
st64 instructions aren't emitted during instruction selection,
and the post-RA scheduler isn't enabled.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217560 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With this a DataLayoutPass can be reused for multiple modules.
Once we have doInitialization/doFinalization, it doesn't seem necessary to pass
a Module to the constructor.
Overall this change seems in line with the idea of making DataLayout a required
part of Module. With it the only way of having a DataLayout used is to add it
to the Module.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217548 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang/LLVM trunk now have support for __builtin_assume_aligned, turn this &&
into an || so we can use it ourselves.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217545 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The routine that determines an alignment given some SCEV returns zero if the
answer is unknown. In a case where we could determine the increment of an
AddRec but not the starting alignment, we would compute the integer modulus by
zero (which is illegal and traps). Prevent this by returning early if either
the start or increment alignment is unknown (zero).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217544 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The increase of the interleave factor to 4 has side-effects
like performance losses eg. due to reminder loops being executed
more frequently and may increase code size. It requires more
analysis and careful heuristic tuning. Expect double digit gains
in small benchmarks like lowercase.c and losses in puzzle.c.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217540 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
