This starts merging MCSection and MCSectionData.
There are a few issues with the current split between MCSection and
MCSectionData.
* It optimizes the the not as important case. We want the production
of .o files to be really fast, but the split puts the information used
for .o emission in a separate data structure.
* The ELF/COFF/MachO hierarchy is not represented in MCSectionData,
leading to some ad-hoc ways to represent the various flags.
* It makes it harder to remember where each item is.
The attached patch starts merging the two by moving the alignment from
MCSectionData to MCSection.
Most of the patch is actually just dropping 'const', since
MCSectionData is mutable, but MCSection was not.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After converting a loop to a hardware loop, the pass should remove
any unnecessary instructions from the old compare-and-branch
code. This patch removes a dead constant assignment that was
used in the compare instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9720
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237373 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the loop trip count may underflow or wrap, the compiler should
not generate a hardware loop since the trip count will be
incorrect.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237365 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code that builds the dependence graph assumes that two PseudoSourceValues
don't alias. In a tail calling function two FixedStackObjects might refer to the
same location. Worse 'immutable' fixed stack objects like function arguments are
not immutable and will be clobbered.
Change this so that a load from a FixedStackObject is not invariant in a tail
calling function and don't return a PseudoSourceValue for an instruction in tail
calling functions when building the dependence graph so that we handle function
arguments conservatively.
Fix for PR23459.
rdar://20740035
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Improved the AnalyzeBranch, InsertBranch, and RemoveBranch
functions in order to handle more of our branch instructions.
This requires changes to analyzeCompare and PredicateInstructions.
Specifically, we've added support for new value compare jumps,
improved handling of endloop, added more compare instructions,
and improved support for predicate instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9559
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236507 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[DebugInfo] Add debug locations to constant SD nodes
This adds debug location to constant nodes of Selection DAG and updates
all places that create constants to pass debug locations
(see PR13269).
Can't guarantee that all locations are correct, but in a lot of cases choice
is obvious, so most of them should be. At least all tests pass.
Tests for these changes do not cover everything, instead just check it for
SDNodes, ARM and AArch64 where it's easy to get incorrect locations on
constants.
This is not complete fix as FastISel contains workaround for wrong debug
locations, which drops locations from instructions on processing constants,
but there isn't currently a way to use debug locations from constants there
as llvm::Constant doesn't cache it (yet). Although this is a bit different
issue, not directly related to these changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9084
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235989 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds debug location to constant nodes of Selection DAG and updates
all places that create constants to pass debug locations
(see PR13269).
Can't guarantee that all locations are correct, but in a lot of cases choice
is obvious, so most of them should be. At least all tests pass.
Tests for these changes do not cover everything, instead just check it for
SDNodes, ARM and AArch64 where it's easy to get incorrect locations on
constants.
This is not complete fix as FastISel contains workaround for wrong debug
locations, which drops locations from instructions on processing constants,
but there isn't currently a way to use debug locations from constants there
as llvm::Constant doesn't cache it (yet). Although this is a bit different
issue, not directly related to these changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9084
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235977 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use a loop instruction with a constant extender for a hardware
loop instruction that is too far away from the start of the loop.
This is cheaper than changing the SA register value.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9262
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
AsmPrinter owns the OutStreamer, so an owning pointer makes sense here. Using a
reference for this is crufty.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@234679 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
