Adding another CU-wide list, in this case of imported_modules (since they
should be relatively rare, it seemed better to add a list where each element
had a "context" value, rather than add a (usually empty) list to every scope).
This takes care of DW_TAG_imported_module, but to fully address PR14606 we'll
need to expand this to cover DW_TAG_imported_declaration too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179836 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When the SlotIndexes pass was introduced it was intended to support insertion
of code during register allocation. Removal of code was a minor consideration
(and raised the question of what to do about dangling SlotIndex objects pointing
to the erased index), so I opted to keep all indexes around indefinitely and
simply null out those that weren't being used.
Nowadays people are moving more code around (e.g. via HandleMove), which means
more zombie indexes. I want to start killing off indexes when we're done with
them to reclaim the resources they use up.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179834 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
InstFlag has a default value of 0 and will simplify the VOP3 patterns.
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179829 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the return type is a pointer and the call returns an integer, then do the
inttoptr convertions. And vice versa.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179817 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This seems to cause a stage-2 LLVM compile failure (by crashing TableGen); do
I'm disabling this for now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
variant/dialect. Addresses a FIXME in the emitMnemonicAliases function.
Use and test case to come shortly.
rdar://13688439 and part of PR13340.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179804 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Many PPC instructions have a so-called 'record form' which stores to a specific
condition register the result of comparing the result of the instruction with
zero (always as a signed comparison). For integer operations on PPC64, this is
always a 64-bit comparison.
This implementation is derived from the implementation in the ARM backend;
there are some differences because PPC condition registers are allocatable
virtual registers (although the record forms always use a specific one), and we
look for a matching subtraction instruction after the compare (but before the
first use) in addition to before it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179802 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Semantics of parameters named Index and Idx were inconsistent between
"include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h", "lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h" and
"lib/IR/Attributes.cpp": sometimes these were fixed 1-based indexes of IR
parameters (or AttributeSet::ReturnIndex for IR return values or
AttributeSet::FunctionIndex for IR functions), other times they were the
internal slot for storage in the underlying AttributeSetImpl. I renamed usage of
the former to "Index" and usage of the latter to "Slot" ("Slot" was already
being used consistently for the latter in a subset of cases)
Patch by Stephen Lin!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179791 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. Verify::VerifyParameterAttrs in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp" and
AttrBuilder::removeFunctionOnlyAttrs in "lib/IR/Attributes.cpp" (only called
by Verify::VerifyFunctionAttrs) separately maintained a list of function-only
attribute types. I've consolidated the logic into a new function used for
both cases in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp", so this logic is in one place (other
than the AsmParser front-end)
2. Various functions in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp" passed AttributeSet around by
reference needlessly, as it's just a handle to an immutable pimpl body.
Patch by Stephen Lin!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179790 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In X86FastISel::X86SelectStore(), improperly aligned stores are rejected and
handled by the DAG-based ISel. However, X86FastISel::X86SelectLoad() makes
no such requirement. There doesn't appear to be an x86 architectural
correctness issue with allowing potentially unaligned store instructions.
This patch removes this restriction.
Patch by Jim Stichnot.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179774 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A min/max operation is represented by a select(cmp(lt/le/gt/ge, X, Y), X, Y)
sequence in LLVM. If we see such a sequence we can treat it just as any other
commutative binary instruction and reduce it.
This appears to help bzip2 by about 1.5% on an imac12,2.
radar://12960601
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179773 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This occurs due to an alloca representing a separate ownership from the
original pointer. Thus consider the following pseudo-IR:
objc_retain(%a)
for (...) {
objc_retain(%a)
%block <- %a
F(%block)
objc_release(%block)
}
objc_release(%a)
From the perspective of the optimizer, the %block is a separate
provenance from the original %a. Thus the optimizer pairs up the inner
retain for %a and the outer release from %a, resulting in segfaults.
This is fixed by noting that the signature of a mismatch of
retain/releases inside the for loop is a Use/CanRelease top down with an
None bottom up (since bottom up the Retain-CanRelease-Use-Release
sequence is completed by the inner objc_retain, but top down due to the
differing provenance from the objc_release said sequence is not
completed). In said case in CheckForCFGHazards, we now clear the state
of %a implying that no pairing will occur.
Additionally a test case is included.
rdar://12969722
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
