advertised - but it does have the caveat that calls to DynamicLibrary::AddSymbol will
"reset" if you shutdown llvm and try to come back for seconds. This is a subtle
behavior change, but I'm assuming that nobody is affected by it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190946 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
XCore target: Add XCoreTargetTransformInfo
This is where getNumberOfRegisters() resides, which in turn returns the
number of vector registers (=0).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190930 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
advertised - but it does have the caveat that calls to DynamicLibrary::AddSymbol will
"reset" if you shutdown llvm and try to come back for seconds. This is a subtle
behavior change, but I'm assuming that nobody is affected by it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190921 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If address space 0 was smaller than the address space
in a constant inttoptr/ptrtoint pair, the wrong mask size
would be used.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We indicate that the object files are safe by emitting a @feat.00
absolute address symbol. The address is presumably interpreted as a
bitfield of features that the compiler would like to enable. Bit 0 is
documented in the PE COFF spec to opt in to "registered SEH", which is
what /safeseh enables.
LLVM's object files are safe by default because LLVM doesn't know how to
produce SEH handlers.
Reviewers: Bigcheese
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1691
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190898 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To avoid regressions with bitfield optimizations, this slicing should take place
later, like ISel time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190891 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In particular, this means we emit non-external symbols defined to
variables, such as aliases or absolute addresses.
This is needed to implement /safeseh, and it appears there was some
confusion about what symbols to emit previously.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190888 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some of this code is no longer necessary since int<->ptr casts are no
longer occur as of r187444.
This also fixes handling vectors of pointers, and adds a bunch of new
testcases for vectors and address spaces.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190885 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Documenting a design choice to generate only medium model sequences for TLS
addresses at this time. Small and large code models could be supported if
necessary.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190883 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Large code model on PPC64 requires creating and referencing TOC entries when
using the addis/ld form of addressing. This was not being done in all cases.
The changes in this patch to PPCAsmPrinter::EmitInstruction() fix this. Two
test cases are also modified to reflect this requirement.
Fast-isel was not creating correct code for loading floating-point constants
using large code model. This also requires the addis/ld form of addressing.
Previously we were using the addis/lfd shortcut which is only applicable to
medium code model. One test case is modified to reflect this requirement.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Upcoming SLP vectorization improvements will want to be able to estimate costs
of horizontal reductions. Add infrastructure to support this.
We model reductions as a series of (shufflevector,add) tuples ultimately
followed by an extractelement. For example, for an add-reduction of <4 x float>
we could generate the following sequence:
(v0, v1, v2, v3)
\ \ / /
\ \ /
+ +
(v0+v2, v1+v3, undef, undef)
\ /
((v0+v2) + (v1+v3), undef, undef)
%rdx.shuf = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx = fadd <4 x float> %rdx, %rdx.shuf
%rdx.shuf7 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx8 = fadd <4 x float> %bin.rdx, %rdx.shuf7
%r = extractelement <4 x float> %bin.rdx8, i32 0
This commit adds a cost model interface "getReductionCost(Opcode, Ty, Pairwise)"
that will allow clients to ask for the cost of such a reduction (as backends
might generate more efficient code than the cost of the individual instructions
summed up). This interface is excercised by the CostModel analysis pass which
looks for reduction patterns like the one above - starting at extractelements -
and if it sees a matching sequence will call the cost model interface.
We will also support a second form of pairwise reduction that is well supported
on common architectures (haddps, vpadd, faddp).
(v0, v1, v2, v3)
\ / \ /
(v0+v1, v2+v3, undef, undef)
\ /
((v0+v1)+(v2+v3), undef, undef, undef)
%rdx.shuf.0.0 = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2 , i32 undef, i32 undef>
%rdx.shuf.0.1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx.0 = fadd <4 x float> %rdx.shuf.0.0, %rdx.shuf.0.1
%rdx.shuf.1.0 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx.0, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%rdx.shuf.1.1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx.0, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx.1 = fadd <4 x float> %rdx.shuf.1.0, %rdx.shuf.1.1
%r = extractelement <4 x float> %bin.rdx.1, i32 0
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can't insert an insertelement after an invoke. We would have to split a
critical edge. So when we see a phi node that uses an invoke we just give up.
radar://14990770
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190871 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
other in memory.
The motivation was to get rid of truncate and shift right instructions that get
in the way of paired load or floating point load.
E.g.,
Consider the following example:
struct Complex {
float real;
float imm;
};
When accessing a complex, llvm was generating a 64-bits load and the imm field
was obtained by a trunc(lshr) sequence, resulting in poor code generation, at
least for x86.
The idea is to declare that two load instructions is the canonical form for
loading two arithmetic type, which are next to each other in memory.
Two scalar loads at a constant offset from each other are pretty
easy to detect for the sorts of passes that like to mess with loads.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190870 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add llvm.x86.* intrinsics for all of the Intel SHA Extensions instructions, as
well as tests. Also remove mayLoad and hasSideEffects, which can be inferred
from the instruction patterns.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190864 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When a truncate node defines a legal vector type but uses an illegal
vector type, the legalization process was splitting the vector until
<1 x vector> type, but then it was failing to scalarize the node because
it did not know how to handle TRUNCATE.
<rdar://problem/14989896>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190830 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
