Some benchmarks have shown that this could lead to a potential
performance benefit, and so adding some flags to try to help measure the
difference.
A possible explanation. In diamond-shaped CFGs (A followed by either
B or C both followed by D), putting B and C both in between A and
D leads to the code being less dense than it could be. Always either
B or C have to be skipped increasing the chance of cache misses etc.
Moving either B or C to after D might be beneficial on average.
In the long run, but we should probably do a better job of analyzing the
basic block and branch probabilities to move the correct one of B or
C to after D. But even if we don't use this in the long run, it is
a good baseline for benchmarking.
Original patch authored by Daniel Jasper with test tweaks and a second
flag added by me.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6969
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226034 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch by Kit Barton.
Support for the ICBT instruction is currently present, but limited to
embedded processors. This change adds a new FeatureICBT that can be used
to identify whether the ICBT instruction is available on a specific processor.
Two new tests are added:
* Positive test to ensure the icbt instruction is present when using
-mcpu=pwr8
* Negative test to ensure the icbt instruction is not generated when
using -mcpu=pwr7
Both test cases use the Prefetch opcode in LLVM. They are based on the
ppc64-prefetch.ll test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226033 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I haven't looked closely at exactly why the side effect is required, but
this seems better than not mentioning it at all.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226030 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Happened pretty commonly during `LLVMContext` teardown when `clang -g`
hit an error. This fixes the use-after-free. Next I'll clean up
teardown so that it's not RAUW'ing when metadata-tracked values are
deleted (only really causes a problem if the graph is mid-construction
when teardown starts, but it's still unnecessary work).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226029 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes lots of generic CodeGen tests that use __gcc_personality_v0.
This suggests that using ExceptionHandling::MSVC was a mistake, and we
should instead classify each function by personality function. This
would, for example, allow us to LTO a binary containing uses of SEH and
Itanium EH.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226019 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This can happen if:
* It is present in a comdat in one file.
* It is not present in the comdat of the file that is kept.
* Is is not used.
This should fix the LTO boostrap.
Thanks to Takumi NAKAMURA for setting up the bot!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225983 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This speeds up the dependency calculations for blocks with many load/store/call instructions.
Beside the improved runtime, there is no functional change.
Compared to the original commit, this re-applied commit contains a bug fix which ensures that there are
no incorrect collisions in the alias cache.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225977 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225974 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now that the passes are wrappers around this, we no longer need
a vtable, virtual destructor, and other associated mess. This is
particularly nice to me as this is a class template. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225970 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds the domtree analysis to the new pass manager. The analysis
returns the same DominatorTree result entity used by the old pass
manager and essentially all of the code is shared. We just have
different boilerplate for running and printing the analysis.
I've converted one test to run in both modes just to make sure this is
exercised while both are live in the tree.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225969 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit refines the pattern for the octeon seq/seqi/sne/snei instructions.
The target register is set to 0 or 1 according to the result of the comparison.
In C, this is something like
rd = (unsigned long)(rs == rt)
This commit adds a zext to bring the result to i64. With this change the
instruction is selected for this type of code. (gcc produces the same code for
the above C code.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225968 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into the new pass manager's analysis cache which stores results
by-value.
Technically speaking, the dom trees were originally not movable but
copyable! This, unsurprisingly, didn't work at all -- the copy was
shallow and just resulted in rampant memory corruption. This change
explicitly forbids copying (as it would need to be a deep copy) and
makes them explicitly movable with the unsurprising boiler plate to
member-wise move them because we can't rely on MSVC to generate this
code for us. =/
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225966 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If there is no associated immediate (MS style inline asm), do not try to access
the operand, assume that it is valid. This should fix the buildbots after SVN
r225941.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225950 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When processing an array, every Elt has the same layout, it is
useless to recursively call each ComputeLinearIndex on each element.
Just do it once and multiply by the number of elements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6832
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225949 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Copy the `GVMap` over to a standard `ValueToValueMapTy` so that we can
reuse the `MapMetadata()` logic. Unfortunately the `GVMap` can't just
be replaced, since `MapMetadata()` likes to modify the map, but at least
this will prevent NVPTX from bitrotting.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225944 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The comment is incorrect, and the code mangles debug info. Remove the
bad logic, which wasn't tested anyway.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225943 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The int instruction takes as an operand an 8-bit immediate value. Validate that
the input is valid rather than silently truncating the value.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225941 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
class members are implicitly "inline", no key word needed.
Naturally, this could change how LLVM inlines these functions because
<GRR>, but that's not an excuse to use the keyword. ;]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225939 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
significantly. Clean it up with the help of clang-format.
I've touched this up by hand in a couple of places that weren't quite
right (IMO). I think most of these actually have bugs open about
already.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225938 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Correct, we have *zero* basic testing of the dominator tree in the
regression test suite. There is a single test that even prints it out,
and that test only checks a single line of the output. There are
a handful of tests that check post dominators, but all of those are
looking for bugs rather than just exercising the basic machinery.
This test is super boring and unexciting. But hey, it's something.
I needed there to be something so I could switch the basic test to run
with both the old and new pass manager.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I.E. more than two -> exactly two
Fix a typo function name in LoopVectorize.
I.E. collectStrideAcccess() -> collectStrideAccess()
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225935 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
