inform the optimizers that the result must be zero/
sign extended from the smaller type. For example,
if a fp to unsigned i16 is promoted to fp to i32,
then we are allowed to assume that the extra 16 bits
are zero (because the result of fp to i16 is undefined
if the result does not fit in an i16). This is
quite aggressive, but should help the optimizers
produce better code. This requires correcting a
test which thought that fp_to_uint is some kind
of truncation, which it is not: in the testcase
(which does fp to i1), either the fp value converts
to 0 or 1 or the result is undefined, which is
quite different to truncation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58991 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the condition for a BRCOND, according to what is
returned by getSetCCResultContents. Since all
targets return the same thing (ZeroOrOneSetCCResult),
this should be harmless! The point is that all over
the place the result of SETCC is fed directly into
BRCOND. On machines for which getSetCCResultContents
returns ZeroOrNegativeOneSetCCResult, this is a
sign-extended boolean. So it seems dangerous to
also feed BRCOND zero-extended booleans in some
circumstances - for example, when promoting the
condition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58861 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
sized integers like i129, and also reduce the number
of assumptions made about how vaarg is implemented.
This still doesn't work correctly for small integers
like (eg) i1 on x86, since x86 passes each of them
(essentially an i8) in a 4 byte stack slot, so the
pointer needs to be advanced by 4 bytes not by 1 byte
as now. But this is no longer a LegalizeTypes problem
(it was also wrong in LT before): it is a bug in the
operation expansion in LegalizeDAG: now LegalizeTypes
turns an i1 vaarg into an i8 vaarg which would work
fine if only the i8 vaarg was turned into correct code
later.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58635 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
may return i8, which can result in SELECT nodes for
which the type of the condition is i8, but there are
no patterns for select with i8 condition. Tweak the
LegalizeTypes logic to avoid this as much as possible.
This isn't a real fix because it is still perfectly
possible to end up with such select nodes - CellSPU
needs to be fixed IMHO.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@57968 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that is not of type MVT::i1 in SELECT and SETCC nodes.
Relax the LegalizeTypes SELECT condition promotion
sanity checks to allow other condition types than i1.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@57966 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the condition of a SELECT node. Make sure that the
correct extension type (any-, sign- or zero-extend)
is used.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@57836 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
than the type an i1 is promoted to (eg: i8). Account
for this. Noticed by Tilmann Scheller on CellSPU; he
will hopefully take care of fixing this in LegalizeDAG
and adding a testcase!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@56997 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with ConstantInt. This led to fixing a bug in TargetLowering.cpp
using getValue instead of getAPIntValue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@56159 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While this is not a wonderful organizing principle, it
does make it easy to find routines, and clear where to
insert new ones.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In LegalizeDAG the value is zero-extended to
the new type before byte swapping. It doesn't
matter how the extension is done since the new
bits are shifted off anyway after the swap, so
extend by any old rubbish bits. This results
in the final assembler for the testcase being
one line shorter.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53604 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SINT_TO_FP libcall plus additional operations:
it might as well be a direct UINT_TO_FP libcall.
So only turn it into an SINT_TO_FP if the target
has special handling for SINT_TO_FP.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53461 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Lack of these caused a bootstrap failure with Fortran
on x86-64 with LegalizeTypes turned on. While there,
be nice to 16 bit machines and support expansion of
i32 too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
soft float: experiments show that targets aren't
expecting this for results or for operands. Add
support select/select_cc result soft float and
correct operand soft float for these.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53245 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
hook for each way in which a result type can be
legalized (promotion, expansion, softening etc),
just use one: ReplaceNodeResults, which returns
a node with exactly the same result types as the
node passed to it, but presumably with a bunch of
custom code behind the scenes. No change if the
new LegalizeTypes infrastructure is not turned on.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
integer of the same type. Before it was "promotion",
but this is confusing because it is quite different
to promotion of integers. Call it "softening" instead,
inspired by "soft float".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52546 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
rather than bundling them together. Rename FloatToInt
to PromoteFloat (better, if not perfect). Reorganize
files by types rather than by operations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
