This is the CodeGen equivalent of r153747. I tested that there is not noticeable
performance difference with any combination of -O0/-O2 /-g when compiling
gcc as a single compilation unit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@153817 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Renamed methods caseBegin, caseEnd and caseDefault with case_begin, case_end, and case_default.
Added some notes relative to case iterators.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@152532 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120130/136146.html
Implemented CaseIterator and it solves almost all described issues: we don't need to mix operand/case/successor indexing anymore. Base iterator class is implemented as a template since it may be initialized either from "const SwitchInst*" or from "SwitchInst*".
ConstCaseIt is just a read-only iterator.
CaseIt is read-write iterator; it allows to change case successor and case value.
Usage of iterator allows totally remove resolveXXXX methods. All indexing convertions done automatically inside the iterator's getters.
Main way of iterator usage looks like this:
SwitchInst *SI = ... // intialize it somehow
for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI->caseBegin(), e = SI->caseEnd(); i != e; ++i) {
BasicBlock *BB = i.getCaseSuccessor();
ConstantInt *V = i.getCaseValue();
// Do something.
}
If you want to convert case number to TerminatorInst successor index, just use getSuccessorIndex iterator's method.
If you want initialize iterator from TerminatorInst successor index, use CaseIt::fromSuccessorIndex(...) method.
There are also related changes in llvm-clients: klee and clang.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@152297 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When the GEP index is a vector of pointers, the code that calculated the size
of the element started from the vector type, and not the contained pointer type.
As a result, instead of looking at the data element pointed by the vector, this
code used the size of the vector. This works for 32bit members (on 32bit
systems), but not for other types. Added code to peel the vector type and
added a test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151626 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151623 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
variable declaration as an argument because we want that address
anyhow for our debug information.
This seems to fix rdar://9965111, at least we have more debug
information than before and from reading the assembly it appears
to be the correct location.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151335 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The purpose of refactoring is to hide operand roles from SwitchInst user (programmer). If you want to play with operands directly, probably you will need lower level methods than SwitchInst ones (TerminatorInst or may be User). After this patch we can reorganize SwitchInst operands and successors as we want.
What was done:
1. Changed semantics of index inside the getCaseValue method:
getCaseValue(0) means "get first case", not a condition. Use getCondition() if you want to resolve the condition. I propose don't mix SwitchInst case indexing with low level indexing (TI successors indexing, User's operands indexing), since it may be dangerous.
2. By the same reason findCaseValue(ConstantInt*) returns actual number of case value. 0 means first case, not default. If there is no case with given value, ErrorIndex will returned.
3. Added getCaseSuccessor method. I propose to avoid usage of TerminatorInst::getSuccessor if you want to resolve case successor BB. Use getCaseSuccessor instead, since internal SwitchInst organization of operands/successors is hidden and may be changed in any moment.
4. Added resolveSuccessorIndex and resolveCaseIndex. The main purpose of these methods is to see how case successors are really mapped in TerminatorInst.
4.1 "resolveSuccessorIndex" was created if you need to level down from SwitchInst to TerminatorInst. It returns TerminatorInst's successor index for given case successor.
4.2 "resolveCaseIndex" converts low level successors index to case index that curresponds to the given successor.
Note: There are also related compatability fix patches for dragonegg, klee, llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, safecode, clang.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@149481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
more robust) ways to do what it was doing now. Also, add static methods
for decoding a ShuffleVector mask.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@149028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before we'd get:
$ clang t.c
fatal error: error in backend: Invalid operand for inline asm constraint 'i'!
Now we get:
$ clang t.c
t.c:16:5: error: invalid operand for inline asm constraint 'i'!
"movq (%4), %%mm0\n"
^
Which at least gets us the inline asm that is the problem.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147502 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
undefined result. This adds new ISD nodes for the new semantics,
selecting them when the LLVM intrinsic indicates that the undef behavior
is desired. The new nodes expand trivially to the old nodes, so targets
don't actually need to do anything to support these new nodes besides
indicating that they should be expanded. I've done this for all the
operand types that I could figure out for all the targets. Owners of
various targets, please review and let me know if any of these are
incorrect.
Note that the expand behavior is *conservatively correct*, and exactly
matches LLVM's current behavior with these operations. Ideally this
patch will not change behavior in any way. For example the regtest suite
finds the exact same instruction sequences coming out of the code
generator. That's why there are no new tests here -- all of this is
being exercised by the existing test suite.
Thanks to Duncan Sands for reviewing the various bits of this patch and
helping me get the wrinkles ironed out with expanding for each target.
Also thanks to Chris for clarifying through all the discussions that
this is indeed the approach he was looking for. That said, there are
likely still rough spots. Further review much appreciated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@146466 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
