Fix the TargetRegisterInfo::NoRegister places where someone preferred
typing 'TargetRegisterInfo::NoRegister' instead of typing '0'.
Note that TableGen is already emitting xx::NoRegister in xxGenRegisterNames.inc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The numbering plan is now:
0 NoRegister.
[1;2^30) Physical registers.
[2^30;2^31) Stack slots.
[2^31;2^32) Virtual registers. (With -1u and -2u used by DenseMapInfo.)
Each segment is filled from the left, so any mistaken interpretation should
quickly cause crashes.
FirstVirtualRegister has been removed. TargetRegisterInfo provides predicates
conversion functions that should be used instead of interpreting register
numbers manually.
It is now legal to pass NoRegister to isPhysicalRegister() and
isVirtualRegister(). The result is false in both cases.
It is quite rare to represent stack slots in this way, so isPhysicalRegister()
and isVirtualRegister() require that isStackSlot() be checked first if it can
possibly return true. This allows a very fast implementation of the common
predicates.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
physical register numbers.
This makes the hack used in LiveInterval official, and lets LiveInterval be
oblivious of stack slots.
The isPhysicalRegister() and isVirtualRegister() predicates don't know about
this, so when a variable may contain a stack slot, isStackSlot() should always
be tested first.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123128 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Print virtual registers numbered from 0 instead of the arbitrary
FirstVirtualRegister. The first virtual register is printed as %vreg0.
TRI::NoRegister is printed as %noreg.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123107 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
depending on TRI::FirstVirtualRegister.
Also use TRI::printReg instead of printing virtual registers directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123101 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Provide MRI::getNumVirtRegs() and TRI::index2VirtReg() functions to allow
iteration over virtual registers without depending on the representation of
virtual register numbers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123098 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
may be called. If the entry block is empty, the insertion point iterator will be
the "end()" value. Calling ->getParent() on it (among others) causes problems.
Modify materializeFrameBaseRegister to take the machine basic block and insert
the frame base register at the beginning of that block. (It's very similar to
what the code does all ready. The only difference is that it will always insert
at the beginning of the entry block instead of after a previous materialization
of the frame base register. I doubt that that matters here.)
<rdar://problem/8782198>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
registers that alias Reg, including itself. This is almost the same as the
existing getAliasSet() method, except for the inclusion of Reg.
The name matches the reflexive TRI::regsOverlap(x, y) relation.
It is very common to do stuff to a register and all its aliases:
stuff(Reg)
for (const unsigned *Alias = TRI->getAliasSet(Reg); *Alias; ++Alias)
stuff(*Alias);
That can now be written as the simpler:
for (const unsigned *Alias = TRI->getOverlaps(Reg); *Alias; ++Alias)
stuff(*Alias);
This change requires a bit more constant space for the alias lists because Reg
is included and because the empty alias list cannot be shared any longer.
If the getAliasSet method is eventually removed, this space can be reclaimed by
sharing overlap lists. For instance, %rax and %eax have identical overlap sets.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with a SimpleValueType, while an EVT supports equality and
inequality comparisons with SimpleValueType.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@118169 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For now it's still a command line option, but the interface to the generic
code doesn't need to know that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@111942 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Nothing fancy, just ask the target if any currently available base reg
is in range for the instruction under consideration and use the first one
that is. Placeholder ARM implementation simply returns false for now.
ongoing saga of rdar://8277890
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@111374 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the local block. Resolve references to those indices to a new base register.
For simplification and testing purposes, a new virtual base register is
allocated for each frame index being resolved. The result is truly horrible,
but correct, code that's good for exercising the new code paths.
Next up is adding thumb1 support, which should be very simple. Following that
will be adding base register re-use and implementing a reasonable ARM
heuristic for when a virtual base register should be generated at all.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@111315 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
whether to allocate a virtual frame base register to resolve the frame
index reference in it. Implement a simple version for ARM to aid debugging.
In LocalStackSlotAllocation, scan the function for frame index references
to local frame indices and ask the target whether to allocate virtual
frame base registers for any it encounters. Purely infrastructural for
debug output. Next step is to actually allocate base registers, then add
intelligent re-use of them.
rdar://8277890
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@111262 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
AggressiveAntiDepBreaker should not be using getPhysicalRegisterRegClass. An
instruction might be using a register that can only be replaced with one from
a subclass of getPhysicalRegisterRegClass.
With this patch we use getMinimalPhysRegClass. This is correct, but
conservative. We should check the uses of the register and select the
largest register class that can be used in all of them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108122 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of getPhysicalRegisterRegClass with it.
If we want to make a copy (or estimate its cost), it is better to use the
smallest class as more efficient operations might be possible.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@107140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
backends and removes the virtual declaration. With that out of the way
I should be able to cleanup one backend at a time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@105321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
implementation that is correct for most targets. Tablegen will override where
needed.
Add MachineOperand::subst{Virt,Phys}Reg methods that correctly handle existing
subreg indices when sustituting registers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@104985 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
structure that represents a mapping without any dependencies on SubRegIndex
numbering.
This brings us closer to being able to remove the explicit SubRegIndex
numbering, and it is now possible to specify any mapping without inventing
*_INVALID register classes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@104563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instructions.
e.g.
%reg1026<def> = VLDMQ %reg1025<kill>, 260, pred:14, pred:%reg0
%reg1027<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026, 6
%reg1028<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026<kill>, 5
...
%reg1029<def> = REG_SEQUENCE %reg1028<kill>, 5, %reg1027<kill>, 6, %reg1028, 7, %reg1027, 8, %reg1028, 9, %reg1027, 10, %reg1030<kill>, 11, %reg1032<kill>, 12
After REG_SEQUENCE is eliminated, we are left with:
%reg1026<def> = VLDMQ %reg1025<kill>, 260, pred:14, pred:%reg0
%reg1029:6<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026, 6
%reg1029:5<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026<kill>, 5
The regular coalescer will not be able to coalesce reg1026 and reg1029 because it doesn't
know how to combine sub-register indices 5 and 6. Now 2-address pass will consult the
target whether sub-registers 5 and 6 of reg1026 can be combined to into a larger
sub-register (or combined to be reg1026 itself as is the case here). If it is possible,
it will be able to replace references of reg1026 with reg1029 + the larger sub-register
index.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@103835 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
is preparatory to having PEI's scavenged frame index value reuse logic
properly distinguish types of frame values (e.g., whether the value is
stack-pointer relative or frame-pointer relative).
No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@98086 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
126.gcc nightly tests. These failures uncovered latent bugs that machine DCE
could remove one half of a stack adjust down/up pair, causing PEI to assert.
This update fixes that, and the tests now pass.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@96822 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
