If an objc_retainBlock has the copy_on_escape metadata attached to it
AND if the block pointer argument only escapes down the stack, we are
allowed to strength reduce the objc_retainBlock to to an objc_retain and
thus optimize it.
Current there is logic in the ARC data flow analysis to handle
this case which is complicated and involved making distinctions in
between objc_retainBlock and objc_retain in certain places and
considering them the same in others.
This patch simplifies said code by:
1. Performing the strength reduction in the initial ARC peephole
analysis (ObjCARCOpts::OptimizeIndividualCalls).
2. Changes the ARC dataflow analysis (which runs after the peephole
analysis) to consider all objc_retainBlock calls to not be optimizable
(since if the call was optimizable, we would have strength reduced it
already).
This patch leaves in the infrastructure in the ARC dataflow analysis to
handle this case, which due to 2 will just be dead code. I am doing this
on purpose to separate the removal of the old code from the testing of
the new code.
<rdar://problem/13249661>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178284 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This follows up Ulrich Weigand's work in PPCInstrInfo.td and
PPCInstr64Bit.td by doing the corresponding work for most of the
Altivec patterns. I have not been able to do anything for the
following classes of instructions:
(1) Vector logicals. These don't have corresponding intrinsics and
don't have a single obvious vector type. So far as I can tell I need
to leave these as VRRC. Affected instructions are: VAND, VANDC,
VNOR, VOR, VXOR, V_SET0.
(2) Instructions that make use of vector shuffle. The selection code
promotes all shuffles to v16i8, so any pattern that matches on a
shuffle is constrained. I haven't found any way to make the patterns
match on their natural types, so I plan to leave these as VRRC.
Affected instructions are: VMRG*, VSPLTB, VSPLTH, VSPLTW, VPKUHUM,
VPKUWUM.
No change in behavior is anticipated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178277 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are 64-bit load/store with byte-swap, and available on the P7 and the A2.
Like the similar instructions for 16- and 32-bit words, these are matched in the
target DAG-combine phase against load/store-bswap pairs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178276 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
PPC ISA 2.06 (P7, A2, etc.) has a popcntd instruction. Add this instruction and
tell TTI about it so that popcount-loop recognition will know about it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178233 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There were a few places where kill flags were not being set correctly, and
where 32-bit instruction variants were being used with 64-bit registers. After
r178180, this code was being triggered causing llc to assert.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178220 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 342d92c7a0.
Turns out we're going with a different schema design to represent
DW_TAG_imported_modules so we won't need this extra field.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
form of call in preference to memory indirect on Atom.
In this case, the patch applies the optimization to the code for reloading
spilled registers.
The patch also includes changes to sibcall.ll and movgs.ll, which were
failing on the Atom buildbot after the first patch was applied.
This patch by Sriram Murali.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178193 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These functions should have the same list of load/store instructions. Now that
all load/store forms have been normalized (to single instructions or pseudos)
they can be resynchronized.
Found by inspection, although hopefully this will improve optimization. I've
also added some comments.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178180 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
indirect through a memory address is to load the memory address into
a register and then call indirect through the register.
This patch implements this improvement by modifying SelectionDAG to
force a function address which is a memory reference to be loaded
into a virtual register.
Patch by Sriram Murali.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178171 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This may be causing a failure on some buildbots:
Referencing function in another module!
tail call fastcc void @_ZL11EvaluateOpstPtRj(i16 zeroext %17, i16* %Vals, i32* %NumVals), !dbg !219
Referencing function in another module!
tail call fastcc void @_ZL11EvaluateOpstPtRj(i16 zeroext %19, i16* %Vals, i32* %NumVals), !dbg !221
Broken module found, compilation aborted!
Stack dump:
0. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'ld-temp.o'.
1. Running pass 'Module Verifier' on function '@_ZL11EvaluateOpstPtRj'
clang: error: unable to execute command: Illegal instruction: 4
clang: error: linker command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation)
<rdar://problem/13516485>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178156 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
6 more piglit tests.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178145 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It seems that the Darwin PPC assembler requires r0 to be written as 0 when it
means 0 (at least in lwarx/stwcx.). Fixes PR15605.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a follow-up to r178073 (which should actually make target-customized
spilling work again).
I still don't have a regression test for this (but it would be good to have
one; Thumb 1 and Mips16 use this callback as well).
Patch by Richard Sandiford.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178127 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178126 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The R0 register can now be allocated because instructions
that cannot use R0 as a GPR have been appropriately marked.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178123 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The register parameter in these instructions becomes the base register in an
r+i ld instruction (and, thus, cannot be r0).
This is not yet testable because we don't yet allocate r0 (and even then any
test would be very fragile).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178121 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Either operand of these pseudo instructions can be transformed into the first
operand of an isel instruction (and this operand cannot be r0).
This is not yet testable because we don't yet allocate r0 (and even when we do,
any test would be very fragile).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Like the addi/addis instructions themselves, these pseudo instructions also
cannot have r0 as their register parameter (because it will be interpreted as
the value 0).
This is not yet testable because we don't yet allocate r0 (and even when we do,
any regression test would be very fragile because it would depend on the
register allocator heuristics).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178118 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some implementation detail in the forgotten past required the link
register to be placed in the GPRC and G8RC register classes. This is
just wrong on the face of it, and causes several extra intersection
register classes to be generated. I found this was having evil
effects on instruction scheduling, by causing the wrong register class
to be consulted for register pressure decisions.
No code generation changes are expected, other than some minor changes
in instruction order. Seven tests in the test bucket required minor
tweaks to adjust to the new normal.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178099 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As Bill Schmidt pointed out to me, only on Darwin do we need to spill/restore
VRSAVE in the SjLj code. For non-Darwin, don't spill/restore VRSAVE (and I've
added some asserts to make sure that we're not).
As it turns out, we're not currently handling the Darwin case correctly (I've
added a FIXME in the test case). I've tried adding various implied register
definitions/uses to force the spill without success, so I'll need to address
this later.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178096 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
if execution failed. ExecuteAndWait returns -1 upon an execution failure, but
checking the return value isn't sufficient because the wait command may
return -1 as well. This new parameter is to be used by the clang driver in a
subsequent commit.
Part of rdar://13362359
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178087 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If we compile a single source program, the `.gcda' file will be generated where
the program was executed. This isn't desirable, because that place may be at an
unpredictable place (the program could call `chdir' for instance).
Instead, we will output the `.gcda' file in the same place we output the `.gcno'
file. I.e., the directory where the executable was generated. This matches GCC's
behavior.
<rdar://problem/13061072> & PR11809
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178084 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
