SROA wants to convert any types of equivalent widths but it's not possible to
convert vectors of pointers to an integer scalar with a single cast. As a
workaround we add a bitcast to the corresponding int ptr type first. This type
of cast used to be an edge case but has become common with SLP vectorization.
Fixes PR17271.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191143 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Allow binutils .type and .section directives to take the following
forms:
- @<type>
- %<type>
- "<type>"
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In AVX 256bit vectors are valid vectors and therefore the Type Legalizer doesn't
split the VSELECT and SETCC nodes. AVX only supports MIN/MAX on 128bit vectors
and this fix enables vector splitting for this special case in the X86 DAG
Combiner.
This fix is related to PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/14594431>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Type Legalizer recognizes that VSELECT needs to be split, because the type
is to wide for the given target. The same does not always apply to SETCC,
because less space is required to encode the result of a comparison. As a result
VSELECT is split and SETCC is unrolled into scalar comparisons.
This commit fixes the issue by checking for VSELECT-SETCC patterns in the DAG
Combiner. If a matching pattern is found, then the result mask of SETCC is
promoted to the expected vector mask for the given target. This mask has usually
te same size as the VSELECT return type (except for Intel KNL). Now the type
legalizer will split both VSELECT and SETCC.
This allows the following X86 DAG Combine code to sucessfully detect the MIN/MAX
pattern. This fixes PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/14594431>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191130 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reapply r191108 with a fix for a memory corruption error I introduced. Of
course, we can't reference the scalars that we replace by vectorizing and then
call their eraseFromParent method. I only 'needed' the scalars to get the
DebugLoc. Just store the DebugLoc before actually vectorizing instead. As a nice
side effect, this also simplifies the interface between BoUpSLP and the
HorizontalReduction class to returning a value pointer (the vectorized tree
root).
radar://14607682
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191123 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r191108.
The horizontal.ll test case fails under libgmalloc. Thanks Shuxin for pointing
this out to me.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191121 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
info finalization to greatly reduce the number of fixups that the
assembler has to handle in order to improve compile time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The problem of r191017 is that when GVN fabricate a val-number for a dead instruction (in order
to make following expr-PRE happy), it forget to fabricate a leader-table entry for it as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191118 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Match reductions starting at binary operation feeding into a phi. The code
handles trees like
r += v1 + v2 + v3 ...
and
r += v1
r += v2
...
and
r *= v1 + v2 + ...
We currently only handle associative operations (add, fadd fast).
The code can now also handle reductions feeding into stores.
a[i] = v1 + v2 + v3 + ...
The code is currently disabled behind the flag "-slp-vectorize-hor". The cost
model for most architectures is not there yet.
I found one opportunity of a horizontal reduction feeding a phi in TSVC
(LoopRerolling-flt) and there are several opportunities where reductions feed
into stores.
radar://14607682
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The GEP pattern is what SCEV expander emits for "ugly geps". The latter is what
you get for pointer subtraction in C code. The rest of instcombine already
knows how to deal with that so just canonicalize on that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191090 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Ensures that the pubnames entries actually refer to the intended
entities. This test could be more flexible if there was a way to do
multiline FileCheck matches with captures (in that way the test wouldn't
need to have hardcoded offset values and would thus be resilient to
changes in the layout of the DIEs in this CU).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191055 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
C-like languages promote types like unsigned short to unsigned int before
performing an arithmetic operation. Currently the rotate matcher in the
DAGCombiner does not consider this situation.
This commit extends the DAGCombiner in the way that the pattern
(or (shl ([az]ext x), (*ext y)), (srl ([az]ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y))))
is folded into
([az]ext (rotl x, y))
The matching is restricted to aext and zext because in this cases the upper
bits are either undefined or known. Test case is included.
This fixes PR16726.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191049 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
C-like languages promote types like unsigned short to unsigned int before
performing an arithmetic operation. Currently the rotate matcher in the
DAGCombiner does not consider this situation.
This commit extends the DAGCombiner in the way that the pattern
(or (shl ([az]ext x), (*ext y)), (srl ([az]ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y))))
is folded into
([az]ext (rotl x, y))
The matching is restricted to aext and zext because in this cases the upper
bits are either undefined or known. Test case is included.
This fixes PR16726.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191045 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If "C1/X" were having multiple uses, the only benefit of this
transformation is to potentially shorten critical path. But it is at the
cost of instroducing additional div.
The additional div may or may not incur cost depending on how div is
implemented. If it is implemented using Newton–Raphson iteration, it dosen't
seem to incur any cost (FIXME). However, if the div blocks the entire
pipeline, that sounds to be pretty expensive. Let CodeGen to take care
this transformation.
This patch sees 6% on a benchmark.
rdar://15032743
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191037 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is how it ignores the dead code:
1) When a dead branch target, say block B, is identified, all the
blocks dominated by B is dead as well.
2) The PHIs of those blocks in dominance-frontier(B) is updated such
that the operands corresponding to dead predecessors are replaced
by "UndefVal".
Using lattice's jargon, the "UndefVal" is the "Top" in essence.
Phi node like this "phi(v1 bb1, undef xx)" will be optimized into
"v1" if v1 is constant, or v1 is an instruction which dominate this
PHI node.
3) When analyzing the availability of a load L, all dead mem-ops which
L depends on disguise as a load which evaluate exactly same value as L.
4) The dead mem-ops will be materialized as "UndefVal" during code motion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adds a flag to the MemorySanitizer pass that enables runtime rewriting of
indirect calls. This is part of MSanDR implementation and is needed to return
control to the DynamiRio-based helper tool on transition between instrumented
and non-instrumented modules. Disabled by default.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191006 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When selecting the DAG (add (WrapperRIP ...), (FrameIndex ...)), X86 code had
spotted the FrameIndex possibility and was working out whether it could fold
the WrapperRIP into this.
The test for forming a %rip version is notionally whether we already have a
base or index register (%rip precludes both), but we were forgetting to account
for the register that would be inserted later to access the frame.
rdar://problem/15024520
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190995 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1) make sure that the first two instructions of the sequence cannot
separate from each other. The linker requires that they be sequential.
If they get separated, it can still work but it will not work in all
cases because the first of the instructions mostly involves the hi part
of the pc relative offset and that part changes slowly. You would have
to be at the right boundary for this to matter.
2) make sure that this sequence begins on a longword boundary.
There appears to be a bug in binutils which makes some of these calculations
get messed up if the instruction sequence does not begin on a longword
boundary. This is being investigated with the appropriate binutils folks.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190966 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the DIVariable::isIndirect() flag set by the frontend instead of
guessing whether to set the machine location's indirection bit.
Paired commit with CFE.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
XCore target: Add XCoreTargetTransformInfo
This is where getNumberOfRegisters() resides, which in turn returns the
number of vector registers (=0).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190930 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If address space 0 was smaller than the address space
in a constant inttoptr/ptrtoint pair, the wrong mask size
would be used.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We indicate that the object files are safe by emitting a @feat.00
absolute address symbol. The address is presumably interpreted as a
bitfield of features that the compiler would like to enable. Bit 0 is
documented in the PE COFF spec to opt in to "registered SEH", which is
what /safeseh enables.
LLVM's object files are safe by default because LLVM doesn't know how to
produce SEH handlers.
Reviewers: Bigcheese
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1691
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190898 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To avoid regressions with bitfield optimizations, this slicing should take place
later, like ISel time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190891 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In particular, this means we emit non-external symbols defined to
variables, such as aliases or absolute addresses.
This is needed to implement /safeseh, and it appears there was some
confusion about what symbols to emit previously.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190888 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some of this code is no longer necessary since int<->ptr casts are no
longer occur as of r187444.
This also fixes handling vectors of pointers, and adds a bunch of new
testcases for vectors and address spaces.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190885 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Large code model on PPC64 requires creating and referencing TOC entries when
using the addis/ld form of addressing. This was not being done in all cases.
The changes in this patch to PPCAsmPrinter::EmitInstruction() fix this. Two
test cases are also modified to reflect this requirement.
Fast-isel was not creating correct code for loading floating-point constants
using large code model. This also requires the addis/ld form of addressing.
Previously we were using the addis/lfd shortcut which is only applicable to
medium code model. One test case is modified to reflect this requirement.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Upcoming SLP vectorization improvements will want to be able to estimate costs
of horizontal reductions. Add infrastructure to support this.
We model reductions as a series of (shufflevector,add) tuples ultimately
followed by an extractelement. For example, for an add-reduction of <4 x float>
we could generate the following sequence:
(v0, v1, v2, v3)
\ \ / /
\ \ /
+ +
(v0+v2, v1+v3, undef, undef)
\ /
((v0+v2) + (v1+v3), undef, undef)
%rdx.shuf = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx = fadd <4 x float> %rdx, %rdx.shuf
%rdx.shuf7 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx8 = fadd <4 x float> %bin.rdx, %rdx.shuf7
%r = extractelement <4 x float> %bin.rdx8, i32 0
This commit adds a cost model interface "getReductionCost(Opcode, Ty, Pairwise)"
that will allow clients to ask for the cost of such a reduction (as backends
might generate more efficient code than the cost of the individual instructions
summed up). This interface is excercised by the CostModel analysis pass which
looks for reduction patterns like the one above - starting at extractelements -
and if it sees a matching sequence will call the cost model interface.
We will also support a second form of pairwise reduction that is well supported
on common architectures (haddps, vpadd, faddp).
(v0, v1, v2, v3)
\ / \ /
(v0+v1, v2+v3, undef, undef)
\ /
((v0+v1)+(v2+v3), undef, undef, undef)
%rdx.shuf.0.0 = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2 , i32 undef, i32 undef>
%rdx.shuf.0.1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx.0 = fadd <4 x float> %rdx.shuf.0.0, %rdx.shuf.0.1
%rdx.shuf.1.0 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx.0, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%rdx.shuf.1.1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx.0, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx.1 = fadd <4 x float> %rdx.shuf.1.0, %rdx.shuf.1.1
%r = extractelement <4 x float> %bin.rdx.1, i32 0
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can't insert an insertelement after an invoke. We would have to split a
critical edge. So when we see a phi node that uses an invoke we just give up.
radar://14990770
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190871 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
other in memory.
The motivation was to get rid of truncate and shift right instructions that get
in the way of paired load or floating point load.
E.g.,
Consider the following example:
struct Complex {
float real;
float imm;
};
When accessing a complex, llvm was generating a 64-bits load and the imm field
was obtained by a trunc(lshr) sequence, resulting in poor code generation, at
least for x86.
The idea is to declare that two load instructions is the canonical form for
loading two arithmetic type, which are next to each other in memory.
Two scalar loads at a constant offset from each other are pretty
easy to detect for the sorts of passes that like to mess with loads.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190870 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When a truncate node defines a legal vector type but uses an illegal
vector type, the legalization process was splitting the vector until
<1 x vector> type, but then it was failing to scalarize the node because
it did not know how to handle TRUNCATE.
<rdar://problem/14989896>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190830 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A DBG_VALUE is register-indirect iff the first operand is a register
_and_ the second operand is an immediate.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- check that -mcpu=slm uses the call register indirect optimization
- check that -mcpu=slm runs the scheduler
- check that -mcpu=slm supports the movbe instruction
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190814 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We would have to compute the pre increment value, either by computing it on
every loop iteration or by splitting the edge out of the loop and inserting a
computation for it there.
For now, just give up vectorizing such loops.
Fixes PR17179.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190790 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The port originally had special patterns for extload, mapping them to the
same instructions as sextload. It seemed neater to have patterns that
match "an extension that is allowed to be signed" and "an extension that
is allowed to be unsigned".
This was originally meant to be a clean-up, but it does improve the handling
of promoted integers a little, as shown by args-06.ll.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a re-commit of r190764, with an extra check to make sure that we're not
performing the transformation on illegal types (a small test case has been
added for this as well).
Original commit message:
The PPC backend uses a target-specific DAG combine to turn unaligned Altivec
loads into a permutation-based sequence when possible. Unfortunately, the
target-specific DAG combine is not always called on all loads of interest
(sometimes the routines in DAGCombine call CombineTo such that the new node and
users are not added to the worklist); allowing the combine to trigger early
(before type legalization) mitigates this problem. Because the autovectorizers
only create legal vector types, I don't expect a lot of cases where this
optimization is enabled by type legalization in practice.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190771 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The '?' flag uses the last section group if the last had a section
group. We treat combining an explicit section group and the '?' as a
hard error.
This fixes PR17198.
Reviewers: rafael, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1686
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190768 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For alignment purposes, the instruction array will always have an even
number of entries, with the final entry potentially unused (in which
case the array will be one longer than indicated by the count of unwind
codes field).
Reviewed by Anton Korobeynikov, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
data structures.
The Win64 EH data structures must be of type IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB
instead of IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32. This is easiely achieved by adding
the VK_COFF_IMGREL32 modifier to the symbol reference.
Change also references to start and end of the SEH range of a function
as offsets to start of the function.
Reviewed by Jim Grosbach, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190766 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is causing test-suite failures.
Original commit message:
The PPC backend uses a target-specific DAG combine to turn unaligned Altivec
loads into a permutation-based sequence when possible. Unfortunately, the
target-specific DAG combine is not always called on all loads of interest
(sometimes the routines in DAGCombine call CombineTo such that the new node and
users are not added to the worklist); allowing the combine to trigger early
(before type legalization) mitigates this problem. Because the autovectorizers
only create legal vector types, I don't expect a lot of cases where this
optimization is enabled by type legalization in practice.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The PPC backend uses a target-specific DAG combine to turn unaligned Altivec
loads into a permutation-based sequence when possible. Unfortunately, the
target-specific DAG combine is not always called on all loads of interest
(sometimes the routines in DAGCombine call CombineTo such that the new node and
users are not added to the worklist); allowing the combine to trigger early
(before type legalization) mitigates this problem. Because the autovectorizers
only create legal vector types, I don't expect a lot of cases where this
optimization is enabled by type legalization in practice.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190764 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DAGCombiner::isAlias can be called with SrcValue1 or SrcValue2 null, and we
can't use AA in this case (if we try, then the casting code in AA will assert).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190763 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This pass was based on the previous (essentially unused) profiling
infrastructure and the assumption that by ordering the basic blocks at
the IR level in a particular way, the correct layout would happen in the
end. This sometimes worked, and mostly didn't. It also was a really
naive implementation of the classical paper that dates from when branch
predictors were primarily directional and when loop structure wasn't
commonly available. It also didn't factor into the equation
non-fallthrough branches and other machine level details.
Anyways, for all of these reasons and more, I wrote
MachineBlockPlacement, which completely supercedes this pass. It both
uses modern profile information infrastructure, and actually works. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we modelled VPR128 and VPR64 as essentially identical
register-classes containing V0-V31 (which had Q0-Q31 as "sub_alias"
sub-registers). This model is starting to cause significant problems
for code generation, particularly writing EXTRACT/INSERT_SUBREG
patterns for converting between the two.
The change here switches to classifying VPR64 & VPR128 as
RegisterOperands, which are essentially aliases for RegisterClasses
with different parsing and printing behaviour. This fits almost
exactly with their real status (VPR128 == FPR128 printed strangely,
VPR64 == FPR64 printed strangely).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190665 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
versions of gold. This support is designed to allow gold to produce
gdb_index sections similar to the accelerator tables and consumable
by gdb.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When a structure is passed by value, and that structure contains a vector
member, according to the PPC ABI, the structure will receive enhanced alignment
(so that the vector within the structure will always be aligned).
This should resolve PR16641.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
