The DAG builder is a convenient place to do it. Hopefully this is more
efficient than a separate traversal over the same region.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155456 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MachineInstr sequence.
This uses the new target interface for tracking register pressure
using pressure sets to model overlapping register classes and
subregisters.
RegisterPressure results can be tracked incrementally or stored at
region boundaries. Global register pressure can be deduced from local
RegisterPressure results if desired.
This is an early, somewhat untested implementation. I'm working on
testing it within the context of a register pressure reducing
MachineScheduler.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155454 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
on X86 Atom. Some of our tests failed because the tail merging part of
the BranchFolding pass was creating new basic blocks which did not
contain live-in information. When the anti-dependency code in the Post-RA
scheduler ran, it would sometimes rename the register containing
the function return value because the fact that the return value was
live-in to the subsequent block had been lost. To fix this, it is necessary
to run the RegisterScavenging code in the BranchFolding pass.
This patch makes sure that the register scavenging code is invoked
in the X86 subtarget only when post-RA scheduling is being done.
Post RA scheduling in the X86 subtarget is only done for Atom.
This patch adds a new function to the TargetRegisterClass to control
whether or not live-ins should be preserved during branch folding.
This is necessary in order for the anti-dependency optimizations done
during the PostRASchedulerList pass to work properly when doing
Post-RA scheduling for the X86 in general and for the Intel Atom in particular.
The patch adds and invokes the new function trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc()
instead of using the existing requiresRegisterScavenging().
It changes BranchFolding.cpp to call trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of
requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes the all the targets that
implemented requiresRegisterScavenging() to also implement
trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc().
It adds an assertion in the Post RA scheduler to make sure that post RA
liveness information is available when it is needed.
It changes the X86 break-anti-dependencies test to use –mcpu=atom, in order
to avoid running into the added assertion.
Finally, this patch restores the use of anti-dependency checking
(which was turned off temporarily for the 3.1 release) for
Intel Atom in the Post RA scheduler.
Patch by Andy Zhang!
Thanks to Jakob and Anton for their reviews.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The X86 target is editing the selection DAG while isel is selecting
nodes following a topological ordering. When the DAG hacking triggers
CSE, nodes can be deleted and bad things happen.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155257 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now that multiple DAGUpdateListeners can be active at the same time,
ISelPosition can become a local variable in DoInstructionSelection.
We simply register an ISelUpdater with CurDAG while ISelPosition exists.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155249 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead of passing listener pointers to RAUW, let SelectionDAG itself
keep a linked list of interested listeners.
This makes it possible to have multiple listeners active at once, like
RAUWUpdateListener was already doing. It also makes it possible to
register listeners up the call stack without controlling all RAUW calls
below.
DAGUpdateListener uses an RAII pattern to add itself to the SelectionDAG
list of active listeners.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The <undef> flag on a def operand only applies to partial register
redefinitions. Only print the flag when relevant, and print it as
<def,read-undef> to make it clearer what it means.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155239 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This nicely handles the most common case of virtual register sets, but
also handles anticipated cases where we will map pointers to IDs.
The goal is not to develop a completely generic SparseSet
template. Instead we want to handle the expected uses within llvm
without any template antics in the client code. I'm adding a bit of
template nastiness here, and some assumption about expected usage in
order to make the client code very clean.
The expected common uses cases I'm designing for:
- integer keys that need to be reindexed, and may map to additional
data
- densely numbered objects where we want pointer keys because no
number->object map exists.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155227 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
commits have had several major issues pointed out in review, and those
issues are not being addressed in a timely fashion. Furthermore, this
was all committed leading up to the v3.1 branch, and we don't need piles
of code with outstanding issues in the branch.
It is possible that not all of these commits were necessary to revert to
get us back to a green state, but I'm going to let the Hexagon
maintainer sort that out. They can recommit, in order, after addressing
the feedback.
Reverted commits, with some notes:
Primary commit r154616: HexagonPacketizer
- There are lots of review comments here. This is the primary reason
for reverting. In particular, it introduced large amount of warnings
due to a bad construct in tablegen.
- Follow-up commits that should be folded back into this when
reposting:
- r154622: CMake fixes
- r154660: Fix numerous build warnings in release builds.
- Please don't resubmit this until the three commits above are
included, and the issues in review addressed.
Primary commit r154695: Pass to replace transfer/copy ...
- Reverted to minimize merge conflicts. I'm not aware of specific
issues with this patch.
Primary commit r154703: New Value Jump.
- Primarily reverted due to merge conflicts.
- Follow-up commits that should be folded back into this when
reposting:
- r154703: Remove iostream usage
- r154758: Fix CMake builds
- r154759: Fix build warnings in release builds
- Please incorporate these fixes and and review feedback before
resubmitting.
Primary commit r154829: Hexagon V5 (floating point) support.
- Primarily reverted due to merge conflicts.
- Follow-up commits that should be folded back into this when
reposting:
- r154841: Remove unused variable (fixing build warnings)
There are also accompanying Clang commits that will be reverted for
consistency.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155047 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
transformation:
(X op C1) ^ C2 --> (X op C1) & ~C2 iff (C1&C2) == C2
should be done.
This change has been tested:
Using a debug+asserts build:
on the specific test case that brought this bug to light
make check-all
lnt nt
using this clang to build a release version of clang
Using the release+asserts clang-with-clang build:
on the specific test case that brought this bug to light
make check-all
lnt nt
Checking in because Evan wants it checked in. Test case forthcoming after
scrubbing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154955 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
for the life of me remember why I wrote it this way, but I can't see any good
reason for it now. This patch replaces the custom linked list with an ilist.
This change should preserve the existing numberings exactly, so no generated code
should change (if it does, file a bug!).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154904 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
both fallthrough and a conditional branch target the same successor.
Gracefully delete the conditional branch and introduce any unconditional
branch needed to reach the actual successor. This fixes memory
corruption in 2009-06-15-RegScavengerAssert.ll and possibly other tests.
Also, while I'm here fix a latent bug I spotted by inspection. I never
applied the same fundamental fix to this fallthrough successor finding
logic that I did to the logic used when there are no conditional
branches. As a consequence it would have selected landing pads had they
be aligned in just the right way here. I don't have a test case as
I spotted this by inspection, and the previous time I found this
required have of TableGen's source code to produce it. =/ I hate backend
bugs. ;]
Thanks to Jim Grosbach for helping me reason through this and reviewing
the fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154867 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is mostly to test the waters. I'd like to get results from FNT
build bots and other bots running on non-x86 platforms.
This feature has been pretty heavily tested over the last few months by
me, and it fixes several of the execution time regressions caused by the
inlining work by preventing inlining decisions from radically impacting
block layout.
I've seen very large improvements in yacr2 and ackermann benchmarks,
along with the expected noise across all of the benchmark suite whenever
code layout changes. I've analyzed all of the regressions and fixed
them, or found them to be impossible to fix. See my email to llvmdev for
more details.
I'd like for this to be in 3.1 as it complements the inliner changes,
but if any failures are showing up or anyone has concerns, it is just
a flag flip and so can be easily turned off.
I'm switching it on tonight to try and get at least one run through
various folks' performance suites in case SPEC or something else has
serious issues with it. I'll watch bots and revert if anything shows up.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154816 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
rotation. When there is a loop backedge which is an unconditional
branch, we will end up with a branch somewhere no matter what. Try
placing this backedge in a fallthrough position above the loop header as
that will definitely remove at least one branch from the loop iteration,
where whole loop rotation may not.
I haven't seen any benchmarks where this is important but loop-blocks.ll
tests for it, and so this will be covered when I flip the default.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154812 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
laid out in a form with a fallthrough into the header and a fallthrough
out of the bottom. In that case, leave the loop alone because any
rotation will introduce unnecessary branches. If either side looks like
it will require an explicit branch, then the rotation won't add any, do
it to ensure the branch occurs outside of the loop (if possible) and
maximize the benefit of the fallthrough in the bottom.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154806 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a complex change that resulted from a great deal of
experimentation with several different benchmarks. The one which proved
the most useful is included as a test case, but I don't know that it
captures all of the relevant changes, as I didn't have specific
regression tests for each, they were more the result of reasoning about
what the old algorithm would possibly do wrong. I'm also failing at the
moment to craft more targeted regression tests for these changes, if
anyone has ideas, it would be welcome.
The first big thing broken with the old algorithm is the idea that we
can take a basic block which has a loop-exiting successor and a looping
successor and use the looping successor as the layout top in order to
get that particular block to be the bottom of the loop after layout.
This happens to work in many cases, but not in all.
The second big thing broken was that we didn't try to select the exit
which fell into the nearest enclosing loop (to which we exit at all). As
a consequence, even if the rotation worked perfectly, it would result in
one of two bad layouts. Either the bottom of the loop would get
fallthrough, skipping across a nearer enclosing loop and thereby making
it discontiguous, or it would be forced to take an explicit jump over
the nearest enclosing loop to earch its successor. The point of the
rotation is to get fallthrough, so we need it to fallthrough to the
nearest loop it can.
The fix to the first issue is to actually layout the loop from the loop
header, and then rotate the loop such that the correct exiting edge can
be a fallthrough edge. This is actually much easier than I anticipated
because we can handle all the hard parts of finding a viable rotation
before we do the layout. We just store that, and then rotate after
layout is finished. No inner loops get split across the post-rotation
backedge because we check for them when selecting the rotation.
That fix exposed a latent problem with our exitting block selection --
we should allow the backedge to point into the middle of some inner-loop
chain as there is no real penalty to it, the whole point is that it
*won't* be a fallthrough edge. This may have blocked the rotation at all
in some cases, I have no idea and no test case as I've never seen it in
practice, it was just noticed by inspection.
Finally, all of these fixes, and studying the loops they produce,
highlighted another problem: in rotating loops like this, we sometimes
fail to align the destination of these backwards jumping edges. Fix this
by actually walking the backwards edges rather than relying on loopinfo.
This fixes regressions on heapsort if block placement is enabled as well
as lots of other cases where the previous logic would introduce an
abundance of unnecessary branches into the execution.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154783 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a special flag for targets that really want their block
terminators in the DAG. The default scheduler cannot handle this
correctly, so it becomes the specialized scheduler's responsibility to
schedule terminators.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154712 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Don't copy offsets into HashData, the underlying vector won't change once the table is finalized.
- Allocate HashData and HashDataContents in a BumpPtrAllocator.
- Allocate string map entries in the same allocator.
- Random cleanups.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154694 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix a dagcombine optimization which assumes that the vsetcc result type is always
of the same size as the compared values. This is ture for SSE/AVX/NEON but not
for all targets.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154490 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Allow cheap instructions to be hoisted if they are register pressure
neutral or better. This happens if the instruction is the last loop use
of another virtual register.
Only expensive instructions are allowed to increase loop register
pressure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154455 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Hoisting a value that is used by a PHI in the loop will introduce a
copy because the live range is extended to cross the PHI.
The same applies to PHIs in exit blocks.
Also use this opportunity to make HasLoopPHIUse() non-recursive.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154454 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
don't elide the branch instruction if it's the only one in the block,
otherwise it's ok.
PR9796 and rdar://11215207
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the loop header has a non-loop predecessor which has been pre-fused into
its chain due to unanalyzable branches. In this case, rotating the
header into the body of the loop in order to place a loop exit at the
bottom of the loop is a Very Bad Idea as it makes the loop
non-contiguous.
I'm working on a good test case for this, but it's a bit annoynig to
craft. I should get one shortly, but I'm submitting this now so I can
begin the (lengthy) performance analysis process. An initial run of LNT
looks really, really good, but there is too much noise there for me to
trust it much.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
legalizer always use the DAG entry node. This is wrong when the libcall is
emitted as a tail call since it effectively folds the return node. If
the return node's input chain is not the entry (i.e. call, load, or store)
use that as the tail call input chain.
PR12419
rdar://9770785
rdar://11195178
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154370 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
