When an instruction match is found, but the subtarget features it
requires are not available (missing floating point unit, or thumb vs arm
mode, for example), issue a diagnostic that identifies what the feature
mismatch is.
rdar://11257547
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
on X86 Atom. Some of our tests failed because the tail merging part of
the BranchFolding pass was creating new basic blocks which did not
contain live-in information. When the anti-dependency code in the Post-RA
scheduler ran, it would sometimes rename the register containing
the function return value because the fact that the return value was
live-in to the subsequent block had been lost. To fix this, it is necessary
to run the RegisterScavenging code in the BranchFolding pass.
This patch makes sure that the register scavenging code is invoked
in the X86 subtarget only when post-RA scheduling is being done.
Post RA scheduling in the X86 subtarget is only done for Atom.
This patch adds a new function to the TargetRegisterClass to control
whether or not live-ins should be preserved during branch folding.
This is necessary in order for the anti-dependency optimizations done
during the PostRASchedulerList pass to work properly when doing
Post-RA scheduling for the X86 in general and for the Intel Atom in particular.
The patch adds and invokes the new function trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc()
instead of using the existing requiresRegisterScavenging().
It changes BranchFolding.cpp to call trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of
requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes the all the targets that
implemented requiresRegisterScavenging() to also implement
trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc().
It adds an assertion in the Post RA scheduler to make sure that post RA
liveness information is available when it is needed.
It changes the X86 break-anti-dependencies test to use –mcpu=atom, in order
to avoid running into the added assertion.
Finally, this patch restores the use of anti-dependency checking
(which was turned off temporarily for the 3.1 release) for
Intel Atom in the Post RA scheduler.
Patch by Andy Zhang!
Thanks to Jakob and Anton for their reviews.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the new TwoOperandAliasConstraint to handle lots of the two-operand aliases
for NEON instructions. There's still more to go, but this is a good chunk of
them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155210 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instructions with writebacks. And add test a case for all opcodes handed by
DecodeVLD2DupInstruction() in ARMDisassembler.cpp .
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154884 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As an example, attach range info to the "invalid instruction" message:
$ clang -arch arm -c asm.c
asm.c:2:11: error: invalid instruction
__asm__("foo r0");
^
<inline asm>:1:2: note: instantiated into assembly here
foo r0
^~~
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
targets so if the branch target has the high bit set it does not get printed as:
beq 0xffffffff8008c404
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While there is an encoding for it in VUZP, the result of that is undefined,
so we should avoid it. Define the instruction as a pseudo for VTRN.32
instead, as the ARM ARM indicates.
rdar://11222366
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154511 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While there is an encoding for it in VZIP, the result of that is undefined,
so we should avoid it. Define the instruction as a pseudo for VTRN.32
instead, as the ARM ARM indicates.
rdar://11221911
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154505 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
predicates.
Also remove NEON2 since it's not really useful and it is confusing. If
NEON + VFP4 implies NEON2 but NEON2 doesn't imply NEON + VFP4, what does it
really mean?
rdar://10139676
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154480 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. The new instruction itinerary entries are not properly described.
2. The asm parser can't handle vfms and vfnms.
3. There were no assembler, disassembler test cases.
4. HasNEON2 has the wrong assembler predicate.
rdar://10139676
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154456 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were incorrectly conflating some add variants which don't have a
cc_out operand with the mirroring sub encodings, which do. Part of the
awesome non-orthogonality legacy of thumb1. Similarly, handling of
add/sub of an immediate was sometimes incorrectly removing the cc_out
operand for add/sub register variants.
rdar://11216577
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154411 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
legalizer always use the DAG entry node. This is wrong when the libcall is
emitted as a tail call since it effectively folds the return node. If
the return node's input chain is not the entry (i.e. call, load, or store)
use that as the tail call input chain.
PR12419
rdar://9770785
rdar://11195178
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154370 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
in-register, such that we can use a single vector store rather then a
series of scalar stores.
For func_4_8 the generated code
vldr d16, LCPI0_0
vmov d17, r0, r1
vadd.i16 d16, d17, d16
vmov.u16 r0, d16[3]
strb r0, [r2, #3]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[2]
strb r0, [r2, #2]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[1]
strb r0, [r2, #1]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[0]
strb r0, [r2]
bx lr
becomes
vldr d16, LCPI0_0
vmov d17, r0, r1
vadd.i16 d16, d17, d16
vuzp.8 d16, d17
vst1.32 {d16[0]}, [r2, :32]
bx lr
I'm not fond of how this combine pessimizes 2012-03-13-DAGCombineBug.ll,
but I couldn't think of a way to judiciously apply this combine.
This
ldrh r0, [r0, #4]
strh r0, [r1]
becomes
vldr d16, [r0]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[2]
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vuzp.16 d16, d17
vst1.32 {d16[0]}, [r1, :32]
PR11158
rdar://10703339
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154340 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The tLDRr instruction with the last register operand set to the zero register
prints in assembly as if no register was specified, and the assembler encodes
it as a tLDRi instruction with a zero immediate. With the integrated assembler,
that zero register gets emitted as "r0", so we get "ldr rx, [ry, r0]" which
is broken. Emit the instruction as tLDRi with a zero immediate. I don't
know if there's a good way to write a testcase for this. Suggestions welcome.
Opportunities for follow-up work:
1) The asm printer should complain if a non-optional register operand is set
to the zero register, instead of silently dropping it.
2) The integrated assembler should complain in the same situation, instead of
silently emitting the operand as "r0".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154261 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
